The title and casting for the new James Bond film, Skyfall, has finally been announced. Enough time has passed so that everyone has forgotten the travesty that was Quantum of Solace, so we’re now eagerly looking forward to seeing James Bond back on the big screen, encountering a new threat to world peace and giving it a swift kick to the goolies. One thing we’re not excited about, however, are the gadgets.
Don’t look so shocked. You know as well as we do that the wacky gadgets and gizmos have been sorely lacking from the James Bond universe since Die Another Day in 2002. With the casting of Daniel Craig and the reboot of the franchise, a creative decision was taken to ditch the character of Q and his laboratory of feverishly insane technology.
That meant no more invisible cars, or lasers concealed in watches, or even an exploding pen. The rationale was that it was too naff and too unrealistic for the lean, mean Bond they had in mind. Which is fair enough, but it’s definitely a case of maximum sadface for the gadget junkie in all of us.
A Word From Our Sponsors
The gaping hole left behind by the bleeding-edge technology has been replaced by something else. Something nefarious, and sinister, and soul-suckingly predictable. It’s called product placement.
It’s always been a feature of the Bond books and films, most outrageously when Pierce Brosnan drove a tank through a Perrier-branded lorry in Goldeneye. But over the years it has grown steadily more problematic, to the extent that entire scenes revolve around certain props.
In Casino Royale, James Bond takes a moment from bashing a terrorist’s brains out to explain to Vesper Lynd about the finer qualities of his Omega watch. Well, not literally, but you get the idea. In the recent documentary about product placement in modern moviemaking, The Greatest Show Ever Sold, Morgan Spurlock is scathing in his criticism; this scene deserves “a special place in hell”. We can’t help but agree.
Elsewhere, a report in The Australian claims that one third of the budget for Skyfall is to come from brands that will appear on screen: “Under a deal struck between the MGM studio and the film’s distributor, Sony, $45 million will be raised from companies wanting their brands displayed on screen”. That makes it the biggest product-placement windfall in the history of cinema, more than double the $20 million raised by Steven Spielberg’s Minority Report to feature products by Lexus, Bulgari and American Express.
From the comfort of our armchairs, we can easily predict which brands and products will appear in the new Bond film. There will be an Aston Martin, in some form. There will be an Omega watch, again. The booze will be provided by Smirnoff and Heineken. The famous blue Speedos may also make another appearance, if the locations are warm and sunny enough — though it’ll have to be Turkey or China, because the other confirmed locations of London and Scotland would see Bond in a wetsuit instead.
But most worryingly, all of the consumer technology will be provided by Sony. As well as owning the studio that’s making the film, they also have a pretty large electronics division of their own. This means Sony Ericsson mobile phones (or maybe Sony-branded phones?); Sony Vaio laptops; Sony Bravia TVs and maybe even a 007-branded Sony Reader. At which point, story credibility is strained to the point where it’s going to snap.
If James Bond existed in the real world, and if money were no object (as it usually isn’t for the international superspy), he’d be using an iPhone or a MacBook Air. He’d be rockin’ a frickin’ iPad, just like Craig does in real life. Nobody in their right mind aspires to own a Sony Ericsson phone. Just look at any movie or TV show now, and they’re all using Apple products — regardless of the fact Apple doesn’t pay for product placement.
Here’s How To Fix It
It’s not too late, though. If the producers want to make people genuinely excited about the technology on display, they need to do one of three things:
1.) Scale back the product placement. Give the sponsors their money back and tell them to sling their gold-plated, diamond-encrusted hook. We’re not blind to the realities of commerce, however, so the chances of this happening are even more remote than finding a solution to the Eurozone crisis.
2.) Feature technology because it’s innovative, not because it’s branded. A sequence featuring the Virgin Galactic spaceflights could potentially make a great opening for Skyfall. Or maybe those creepy humanoid robots by Boston Dynamics;Â they’d be eye-catching henchmen for the new film (whilst simultaneously setting back human-robot relations by a couple of decades).
3.) Bring back Q. There, we’ve said it. We’re not trying to be knee-jerk reactionaries here, but Q is an integral part of Ian Fleming’s Bond mythos, and HE MUST BE REINSTATED IMMEDIATELY! It’s entirely possible to represent the character in a way that’s credible and not cheesy; it just takes a bit of imagination on the part of director Sam Mendes and his crew.
A new Bond film is always a good thing, don’t get us wrong. The public appetite for his adventures haven’t waned in nearly fifty years. It also keeps a lot of talented British filmmakers and actors in regular work, while reminding the rest of the world of that exact talent. But there’s a crucial component that’s been missing from the recent films, and that’s gadgets. It’s time they addressed the problem, and stopped plastering over it with a giant corporate badge.









As soon as Pierce Brosnan left, James Bond went downhill.
Daniel Craig is by far the superior Bond! Die Another Day was a real low point for the franchise – not since Moonraker have we seen such stupid, idiotic gadgets that detracted from the story. Invisible cars and DNA therapy – what a load of shite!
There’s a place in my heart for those daft old Roger Moore moviesbut Daniel Craig is certainly a better Bond than Brosnan.
Maybe even the best ever.
Oh dear, never mind those two JSevenmbo. Ya, DC is more cold and dark and moody. But thats what all the teens and emos want these days. Pierce in my mind got the essence of Bond just right. Bond has always been about the cheesy gadgets, the cheesy come on lines and the impossible plot lines. It was always tongue-in-cheek. Pierce Brosnan for me managed that balance of cheese and modern bond. Not too much of either. Much the same that Sean Connery did back in the day. As overly camp as Roger Moore was, he also brought a certain cheekiness to the bond character.
My favourite line was Pierce saying to Christmas Jones, with a cheeky grin, before they get jiggy with it …”Who says Christmas doesn’t come twice?” *ba doom tsshh*
It’s true, I am a 37 year old emu.
Or whatever the hell you just said.
“You always were a cunning linguist James.” I think Brosnan took it too far with the cheesy. As much as I like DC as Bond he could do with lightening up a bit every now and then!
True Bond will always be SC in Dr. No though..
Most admit, I bloody love the Brosnan films. More so than Craig’s, anyway.
Well written! Couldn’t agree more.
I stopped watching Bond movies when they turned into long rambling adverts with expensive special effects – though I have to admit that watching the Roger Moore era stuff isn’t as good in hindsight as it seemed at the time.
I spose the franchise has enough momentum now to get the sponsors on board for another outing though.
I must be really unobservant! The only product placement I’ve noticed is Apple (in just about everything, even games) and Macdonalds (the scene in The day the earth stood still when the M is super clearly reflected on the cars bonnet)
Woah, go back and watch Casino Royale and QoS — your jaw will actually drop; I kid you not.
I think Daniel is a great actor, and a great Bond. But both Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace were terrible, in my mind. I wish they hadn’t gone back to the beginning of the bond story (i.e, before Dr. No), because this confuses things. Like casting. Surely you couldn’t have John Cleese playing Q when he was originally a Q Junior?
As long as its done right I have no problem with product placement. After all it gets a bit tiresome seeing made up brands and blanked out logos in Movies and TV.
Also why would a spy use an iphone, mac book or an ipad they would use something that is secure and customisable. It’s a frankly ridiculous statement and then you go on about bringing back gadgets. Bespoke devices and customisation is hardly an apple hallmark.
I love the old bonds but I also like the new ones as well. The whole campy tongue in cheek action film was just not doing it for me before the reboot whereas once it was cool and funny it just started getting cheesy and repeatable.
At the end of the day as long as the script isn’t altered to accommodate them then extra cash will just make for a better film. Who cares if all the TVs and phones are sony, or the alcohol is a certain brand. If it wasn’t they would just have to make up fake brands or debadge everything in sight.
Bond could be doing with some more gadgets but unless they are believable I don’t think they have a place any more. So no more laser watches, or magnetic watches, or disk cutter watches. Go back to the days of the briefcase with knives in it and electronic lock hackers. Things that could and maybe do exist in real life.
Also on a personal note I wouldn’t mind a sony phone they are getting solid reviews recently. VAIO laptops have always been decent if a little expensive and Sony TVs sell pretty well so why not. And I have wanted an Omega watch since I was 5 years old just because it was the watch James Bond used and that was 20 years ago so no change there. I still want an Omega watch but now I want one because they are really nice watches.
“Also why would a spy use an iphone, mac book or an ipad they would use something that is secure and customisable. It’s a frankly ridiculous statement and then you go on about bringing back gadgets. Bespoke devices and customisation is hardly an apple hallmark.”
Exactly my thoughts, I would assume a spy would use a phone that would work best for his role and not to make him look good at the bar when he will no doubt flirts with another woman.
The MI5 could have their own Android based operating system.
Galaxy S3 for Bond!
About 7 years ago, I sat down in the cinema to watch Blade: Trinity.
Then this happened: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv0ZPj0JLQ4
I couldn’t believe my eyes. It was the most embarrassing, cringe-worthy jarring product placement I’ve ever seen. And it helped me to hate the film. Watch that film and tell me you’ve seen worse product placement!
Jeepers creepers, that is shockingly bad. I’m pretty sure Apple doesn’t pay for product placement, but that is so friggin’ obvious.
Actually, i dont think thats bad at all. While i disliked the film for other reasons. I think that is pretty subtle compared to alot of PP ive seen. Not once was a logo showed.
Sorry Kauzion,but I suspect you either own an Android or maybe being a little pedantic about that PP.
Some far more blatant examples…
Cringe at this ; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDsqySu0vMA
They don’t pay Cash for product placement but they do pay. There’s no way they would be in all these films without some kind of inducement.
according to wiki anyway! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_placement
The James Bond pre-Craig was a psychopath. There’s a scene in Goldfinger where a fight culminates in him electrocuting a man in a bath, and all he has to say is “Shocking.” JAMES YOU HAVE JUST MURDERED A MAN.
Why would he have to wear a wetsuit in Scotland? I’ve enjoyed plenty of balmy summer holidays on the West Coast.
daniel craig is a good bond but bond is not bond without Q and his gadgets. lets stop trying to turn James bond into Jason Bourne and bring back what we all love. 007, Q and gadgets.
Apple fanboy much?
“Nobody in their right mind aspires to own a Sony Ericsson phone.”
So I guess I’m not in my right mind then? After switching phones all year, I’ve finally stuck on a Sony Ericsson, which I should have gone for to start with considering they’re the best brand of phones I’ve ever had, and I’ve had most of them.
Not everyone is an iSheep you know?
Most of my phone history is Sony Ericsson, currently using a nokia e72.
SE have lost their way as of late…
Last week I started using an Xperia Play, even as someone who wants the latest and greatest, I can’t see myself upgrading until Sony come out with an Xperia Play 2. and I’m definately not going back to anything that isn’t Sony.
Is nobody going to mention the Ford / Jaguar / Landrover thing then? Ford have a stake in AM too, but at least there’s a tradition there.
An iPad?? What would MI5 stick on their to assist him – Angry Bird Agents? They’d have to go through the approvals process first. More likely is they’d choose an open system aka Android.
Your apps would only need approval if you were trying to sell them on the App Store.
You are free to create whatever app you want to run on your own iPad.
Yeah OK, so what you’re saying is Sony branding is wrong but featuring already over-exposed Apple products isn’t (regardless of whether they pay for the placement or not)?
Further to this, you would send a secret agent into the field with an iPhone 4S? What happens 6 hours into the mission when the battery drains due to a lack of a power point? Apple only just caught up with Android, finally realising that wire-free updating may actually be a good idea (yeah, about 4 years late with that one Apple…well done), imagine what would happen if Bond had to sync the phone with iTunes to get a crucial update from M – better technology? Only an Apple fanboy would propose that. Besides if you’re worried about communication in the field you’d have a dumbphone that can run for 4 days off a full charge so an Android, diePhone or a Windows phone would all be pointless.
As for the lack of gadgets overall? It was clearly stated by production staff during the development of the screenplay of Casino Royale that they were going to steer away from the whole “techy” side of things and go back to the gritty Bond so beloved by fans of Ian Fleming’s original, book based incarnation…the whole point of Bond is that the gadgets should be secondary to the character not the other way around and since Connery Daniel Craig is the first one to really nail it.
“If James Bond existed in the real world, and if money were no object (as it usually isn’t for the international superspy), he’d be using an iPhone or a MacBook Air.”
No, no he wouldn’t. Because I have yet to hear of any government department issuing iPhones or MacBooks to people using security cleared data.