Privacy, the concept of friendship — add one more thing to the list of notions Facebook’s smashed. The old assumption that we’re all connected by six degrees of separation is outdated, Facebook says: now it’s 4.74, across the globe.
Granted, the new law applies only to the social network itself, not the entire planet’s population. But Facebook’s 721 million active users — the most detailed number we’ve seen to date, by the way — covers 10% of the species. So it’s not out of the question to extrapolate. And the data is pretty crazy:
“While 99.6% of all pairs of users are connected by paths with 5 degrees (6 hops), 92% are connected by only four degrees (5 hops). And as Facebook has grown over the years, representing an ever larger fraction of the global population, it has become steadily more connected. The average distance in 2008 was 5.28 hops, while now it is 4.74.
Thus, when considering even the most distant Facebook user in the Siberian tundra or the Peruvian rainforest, a friend of your friend probably knows a friend of their friend.”
So the world is getting closer as everyone friends everyone. And when you keep it to one single nation, where 84% of our friendships tend to be, the relations are even tighter: “The world gets even smaller, and most pairs of people are only separated by 3 degrees (4 hops).”
So is the world narrowing, or are our definitions of relationships widening and diluting? Both could be the case, but I’m certain of the latter — what it says to claim I “know someone” means less now than it ever has, for better or for worse. [Facebook via PC World]
Image Credit: Idolimage









Yes but more importantly I have this little gold star next to my name now
As the first of the starkind let me welcome you to our elite personhood.
Does that make you the ‘Adam’ of us Starkind?
p.s. Congrats A1pha0mega but a friendly word of warning…..there are some round here who don’t look kindly to new folk……a suspicious lot they are….but stick with us and you’ll do alright.
Thanks! Just need to add a picture… not sure how though.
The good lady Kat explains it all here:
http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2011/09/how-to-add-your-rugged-or-pretty-faces-to-your-commenting-avatars/
“Does that make you the ‘Adam’ of us Starkind?”
No it make s me an opinionated old git who never shuts up.
Ah me too – that must be why I have a star!
“No it make s me an opinionated old git who never shuts up.”
I’ve noticed!
@udimion – Look who’s talking Mr “comments longer then the article”
Hey, I heard there was a Star party or something, can I join
“Facebook’s 721 active users” – Good god, lots of people have left since Google+ started
Yeah, 4.74 degrees of separation suddenly seems a whole lot less impressive with those numbers!
Also the “six degrees of separation” thing has not been “smashed” by Facebook. Because 1.) It was never said it was 6 for every person (This is obvious, since you are only 1 degree from all your immediate family) 2.) 4.74 is a mean average, how the fuck can you be 4.74 degrees from anyone when each degree is a person. 3.) Facebook hold about 12% of the worlds population, is that really a large enough sample?
Sorry but Sam’s piss poor writing style is really getting up my nose today. All I need is another Diaz article about “fragmentaion” and I shall exploda.
Exploda, don’t you mean you’ll fragment!?
I don’t know, when something is blown to smithereens do you consider each smithereen a fragmment?
Well if by fragment we mean a small incomplete or broken part then yes, it would be a fragment because it would be an imcomplete part of the whole – you, much like a vase, you explode into small portions, each being a fragment. Essentially, you would be Android.
(Fragment also happens to be the title of the worst book I have ever read, ever! It is just awful. The only good part of it was finishing it (and even that was a struggle) and knowing I never have to read it again, unfortunately I am still left with the trauma of actually having read it.
)
Facebook’s 721 active users, that’s some pretty mighty bragging rights there. I’m sure i know 87% of the worlds population and i only have 109 friends on the face book. Once again, we seem to be being lied to by these faceless corporations. My letters are in the post to my local MP, Points of View and Alan Titsmarsh.
The original number of six degrees is more accurate, even if its only limited to facebook. The six degrees of separation goes by the notion that we actually ‘know’ the person in the first degree and they ‘know’ the person in the second and so on.
What i mean by this is that the large majority of facebook users are the type of people who use “:)” “lol” “lmfao” “totes” etc (i just asked my little sister) – The younger generation. These people add ‘friends’ to their profile just to increase their number of friends. There is no way they personally know all these people in the same respect that we know the people in the original six degrees of separation. Therefore the number 4.74 is purely skeptical, or in other words, bullshit.
I’ll give you a factoid… Facebook can’t say jack about privacy.
Wonder how many of those 721 million active users are just bots for Zynga and other fb games.
us “starkind” – has Giz UK gotten to that level of exclusivity already! oh no
It’s ok. The whole “starkind” thing is entirely my own invention. If anything it is a parody of the way that certain people act on US Giz. I am totally against the idea of elitism and am glad that starring is in the hands of commenters here rather than writers.
You have nothing to fear – we’re not elitist, because on Giz Uk elitism is wrong, and only the non-starkind are wrong.
If I had the power to star you again Udimion, I would
Somehow I feel more special not having a star looking at all these comments….
SILENCE FOOLISH MORTAL, DO NOT PROVOKE THE WRATH OF THE STARKIND.