In a privacy policy shift, Google announced today that it will begin tracking users universally across all its services — Gmail, Search, YouTube and more — and sharing data on user activity across all of them.
The change was announced in a blog post today, and will go into effect on the first of March. After that, if you are signed into your Google Account to use any service at all, the company can use that information on other services as well. As Google puts it:
“Our new Privacy Policy makes clear that, if you’re signed in, we may combine information you’ve provided from one service with information from other services. In short, we’ll treat you as a single user across all our products, which will mean a simpler, more intuitive Google experience.”
This has been a long time coming. Google’s privacy policies have been shifting towards sharing data across its services, and away from data compartmentalisation for some time. It’s been consistently de-anonymising you, initially requiring real names with Plus, for example, and then tying your Plus account to your Gmail account. But this is an entirely new level of sharing.
What this means for you is that data from the things you search for, the emails you send, the places you look up on Google Maps, the videos you watch in YouTube, the discussions you have on Google+ will all be collected in one place. It seems like it will particularly affect Android users, whose real-time location (if they are Latitude users), Google Wallet data and much more will all be shared with the rest of Google. And if you have signed up for Google+, odds are the company even knows your real name. Considering you already share a lot of data with Google, and there’s a common shared opinion that Google already knows everything about you, sharing data across services isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
All of that data history will now be explicitly cross-referenced. Although it refers to providing users a better experience (read: more highly tailored results), presumably it is so that Google can deliver more highly targeted ads. (There has, incidentally, never been a better time to familiarise yourself with Google’s Ad Preferences.)
So why could this be the end of “don’t be evil”? Because Google’s changing. Google built its reputation, and its multi-billion pound business, on the promise of its “don’t be evil” philosophy. That’s been largely interpreted as meaning that Google will always put its users first, an interpretation that Google has cultivated and encouraged. Google has built a very lucrative company on the reputation of user respect. This latest move might be marketed to you as a bonus for greater customisation, but really it’s about ads. Google is an ad company after all, and its seems as if it’s putting its needs first. If you don’t want your data shared across the rest of Google you have a few weeks to pull your data out, using its data-liberation service, but if you want to use Google services, you have to agree to these rules.
Google’s philosophy speaks directly to making money without doing evil. And it is very explicit in calling out advertising in the section on “evil.” But while it emphasises that ads should be relevant, obvious, and “not flashy,” what seems to have been forgotten is a respect for its users privacy, and established practices.
Among its privacy principles, number four notes:
“People have different privacy concerns and needs. To best serve the full range of our users, Google strives to offer them meaningful and fine-grained choices over the use of their personal information. We believe personal information should not be held hostage and we are committed to building products that let users export their personal information to other services. We don‘t sell users’ personal information.”
This crosses that line at least. It eliminates that fine-grained control, and means that things you could do in relative anonymity today, will be explicitly associated with your name, your face, your phone number come March 1st. If you use Google’s services, you have to agree to this new privacy policy. Yet a real concern for various privacy concerns would recognise that I might not want Google associating two pieces of personal information.
It’s also an explicit reversal of its previous policies. As Google noted in 2009:
“Previously, we only offered Personalised Search for signed-in users, and only when they had Web History enabled on their Google Accounts. What we’re doing today is expanding Personalised Search so that we can provide it to signed-out users as well. This addition enables us to customise search results for you based upon 180 days of search activity linked to an anonymous cookie in your browser. It’s completely separate from your Google Account and Web History (which are only available to signed-in users). You’ll know when we customise results because a “View customisations” link will appear on the top right of the search results page. Clicking the link will let you see how we’ve customised your results and also let you turn off this type of customisation.”
The changes come shortly after Google revamped its search results to include social results it called Search plus Your World. Although that move has drawn heavy criticism from all over the web, at least it gives users the option to not participate. [GoogleBlog via Washington Post]













Sigh, more sensationalist American guff.
Anyone that’s read what Google are doing, won’t come to the same conclusion as this writer (who is clearly paid on page hits).
And once again MikJe, you don’t have to read it or even comment on it!
Do you do this just so you can have a whinge?
Lots of the above is true, Google knows a hell of a lot about me and uses it to sell advertising. As a result that advertising is better targeted and more likely to be relevant. In return for this I get a shitload of cool stuff for free, Google’s text adds are far less intrusive then the ads that pay for this site and far less then the advertising facebook inserts in your stream.
At the end of the day, if you are concerned about Google “invading your privacy” then you can leave all their services and take all your data with you (they will even help you to do so). Personally, however I consider this article to be scaremongering at the least so will pay it no further mind.
I’m still happier with Google and its services than I am with other providers for many of the same reasons you provide, Darrell.
Google set themselves up for this kind of sensationalist journalism when they started up as “don’t be evil” (whilst it was perceived that all others were evil). As soon as they backpedal on their earlier promises, people pounce on the opportunity to badmouth them as market leader.
But I don’t believe they have backpedaled. Changing times require changing responses. Everything that Google gives for free (far more than any other company) it does because of advertising. It’s the same all over the web. If you wan’t you web free of charge you have to pay somewhere else at least by pooling your data Google makes adverts relevant to you.
Of course, I do understand – they are in an evolving sector after all and they need this to improve and develop their business. Backpedaled might be a poor choice of words, but certainly it’s a major change.
Who knows, this may actually lead to some quite cool cross-site mixing of relevant and/or interesting content across their services. After all, I’m fed up of going on to sites (including giz uk) and getting some very weird and irrelevant ads served up.
Hello tin foil hat man.
This article doesn’t even make sense.
““People have different privacy concerns and needs. To best serve the full range of our users, Google strives to offer them meaningful and fine-grained choices over the use of their personal information. We believe personal information should not be held hostage and we are committed to building products that let users export their personal information to other services. We don‘t sell users’ personal information.”
This crosses that line at least. It eliminates that fine-grained control, and means that things you could do in relative anonymity today, will be explicitly associated with your name, your face, your phone number come March 1st.”
Uh. No it doesn’t? It says, right there in the quote, “We believe personal information should not be held hostage and we are committed to building products that let users export their personal information to other services.”. Any data you choose to submit to Google, you can then take right back at any point. In what way is that a bad thing? Look at Facebook, you can’t even actually delete anything from it – not even your account – let alone export it elsewhere to use on a different service instead.
Maybe a little less rush to print something sensational for page hits and a bit more time paying attention to reality and facts would be a good plan?
“And if you have signed up for Google+, odds are the company even knows your real name”
Well yeah I mean a lot of people also use their real name for their gmail address so…what?
Thanks for the heads up on ads preferences though, it made me laugh. Google thinks I’m 65. I’m actually 23 ;-;
Colour me surprised.. I assumed they had always done this across their services
Only thing that pisses me off is the last part where they use a cookie so even signing out of Google doesnt stop the personalised searches. At least it sounds like it can still be turned off, as long as it remembers that I want it turned off
Pingback: Clean Your Google Search History Before New Privacy Policy Takes Effect | THE ROYCROFT REPORT.com