Nokia’s first Windows Phone effort was met with decent reviews, but not exactly staggering sales. Networks even complained about the cost of the Lumia 800. Now Nokia’s hoping to win the hearts and minds of the budget-conscious, Windows Phone-craving crowd with its cheaper Lumia 710, but is it any good?
It’s Nokia’s second attempt at a Windows Phone that slots in underneath its current flagship the Lumia 800, but still packs almost the same guts.
Anyone who’s after a Nokia Windows phone on a budget, or wants to customise their phone with different swappable back covers like the “xpress-on” covers of yesteryear.
Nokia has certainly aped Samsung and other budget smartphone manufacturers with its design of the Lumia 710. It’s not an ugly phone, but on first glance it looks like a Galaxy Gio, only with the cut off corners of Motorola’s Xoom 2. The curved plastic swappable back ads a splash of colour, but gives the phone a cheap appearance, which is hammered home by the cheap looking and feeling plastic raised button panel on its face.
It’s a Windows Phone so it behaves exactly like its bigger brother the Lumia 800 (check out our Lumia 800 review for a more in-depth look at the software), with exactly the same processor; RAM and version of Windows Phone. It’s a smooth experience and everything feels pretty zippy as you burn through the menus and apps.
The curved back actually fits in your hand nicely, and the plastic is pretty grippy so you don’t feel like the phone is going to shoot out and test that legendary Nokia resilience as it says hello to the pavement.
All the buttons work fine, but they’re not particularly satisfying to use like they were on the Lumia 800. The power button is positioned on the top though, like most other phones, which is an enhancement over the Lumia 800’s power button placement, which was infuriatingly easy to hit where it was on the side-edge.
The 3.7-inch screen looks pretty good too. It’s pretty standard “ClearBlack” LCD, so it’s not quite as vivid and saturated as the Lumia 800’s AMOLED, but pictures look vibrant and text looks sharp on its 800×480 resolution display. It’s also protected by Gorilla Glass, which combined with the replaceable back covers means you should be good to treat this phone a little more roughly than you would say an iPhone or Galaxy Nexus.
It’s Windows Phone, so you know you’re getting pretty much exactly the same experience as any other high-end Windows Phone, but at a lower price point. You can feel free to use the phone without having to worry about it being fragile and earth-shatteringly expensive if it happens to hit the deck.
Although it feels pretty solidly-constructed; doesn’t really creak and is dead light, it just feels a bit cheap. The buttons on the front look and feel a bit naff. I know it’s a cost-saving measure not having capacitive buttons, but that, combined with a fingerprint magnet-of-a-screen, just makes the Lumia 710 instantly look budget. You might want a phone to be budget, but you certainly don’t want that phone to look budget.
It could be me, but I found the keyboard surprisingly inaccurate. That, and when I tapped on the lower right-hand side of the keyboard (the return/delete/full stop area), the screen would flicker just slightly when typing out texts. It didn’t happen all the time, and could be my unit, but it was a bit weird.
- The screen looks good, when clean. Keeping it that way was difficult; it’s the biggest fingerprint magnet I’ve ever come across.
- You get two back covers in the box: a coloured one and a black one. They’re quite easy to get on and off, but they feel a tad flimsy. I could certainly see the lugs that hold them in place breaking or wearing down.
- Nokia’s range of Windows Phone 7 apps are great. You’ve got Nokia Maps, Drive and Music. The range of music available in Nokia Music has grown much larger since we tested the Lumia 800 and it’s a really great way to discover music for free. It’s worth getting a Nokia Windows Phone 7 over other WP7 offerings just for that.
- The camera is of the five-megapixel variety and does surprisingly well in low light. Images are relatively free of grain and well saturated – I was quite impressed. Video quality at 720p was pretty good too, although like a lot of pocket shooters it suffered from blurring with motion, but the colours again were well reproduced even in relatively low light conditions.
If you’re after a new, cheap Windows Phone experience, and Nokia plays the budget phone pricing game with networks come February, then you won’t go far wrong with the Lumia 710. The Windows Phone experience is solid; the camera is pretty good, and you’ve got Nokia’s great Windows Phone apps to boot. But a small battery; limited 8GB of storage space, and cheap-feel means that there are better Windows Phones out there. The Lumia 800 is certainly worth the extra money just for the quality feel for example, so it really comes down to price point and your budget.
Nokia Lumia 710
- Screen: 3.7-inch ClearBlack LCD with Gorilla Glass
- Processor: 1.4GHz Single-core Qualcomm Snapdragon
- Storage: 8GB flash
- Camera: 5-MP rear camera with LED flash
- Connectivity: HSPDA/3G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
- Ports: microUSB, 3.5mm headphones
- Battery: 1300mAh
- Price: £300 off network




























Hmm, I wonder how much Microsoft/Nokia paid for this review.
Please don’t say they didn’t, as it’s clear Windows Phone is being treated differently to other mobile OS’s
Remember when Android was the new boy in town? Every review on the internet compared iOS and Android app counts, and basically said, don’t buy Android, it’s got no apps.
Yet not a single mention of the dire state of Windows Phone apps….
I’m guessing Gizmodo are either paid to write this review, or scared to upset Microsoft and risk losing their share of MS’s mega advertising budget.
You don’t actually read the articles, do you?
I don’t think he does, no. Nor ever picked up a WP7 handset…
I had a HTC Titan for a couple of days, it was utter rubbish. Like a really bad Android handset from 2009.
Why let little things like reading articles and using facts get in the way of moronic gibberish?
Remember when Android was the new boy in town and it didn’t have any apps and it took time for it to build apps then no one mentioned the lack of apps again? WP7 reviews from Giz (and every other blog) took them to task over having a limited range of apps at launch, they now have 50k apps and no one gives a shit.
50,000 apps available is not as many as iOS, or Android, but it’s a damn good start. And most of them look better than most Android apps. So suck it up, stop going “WELL EVERYONE PICKED ON ANDROID AND IT’S THE BEST” and have a reasonable discussion.
I think the real question is google paying you for spouting anti wp7/iOS bile, or do you just do it out of some kind of misplaced loyalty?
One of the biggest reasons I have frequented Giz for so long is because of the fair and candid articles from it’s writers that tend to give you a taste of what is available out there, and leave it up to it’s readers to form their own opinions. There are exceptions to this (Jesus Diaz), but for the majority of the case, things are well written and informative. I still think Kats review of the HTC Legend is one of the best I’ve ever read on Giz from back in the day.
The fact that you have formed such an opinion shows that you haven’t comprehended the review well at all, nor have you taken the time to bother reading the other articles around, but they definitely do not reflect what you believe. In this instance, you are not a troll, or a fanboy, but a major biggot, which is very sad…
It saddens me that we haven’t seen a phone made to the quality of the HTC Legend since. What’s with that, HTC?
This is true, I thought the unibody design was great and solid…hopefully we at least have a spiritual successor in the future.
I had a HTC Legend, it was a supurb phone, the perfect balance of screen site, weight and style. HTC got lost when they tried to cater for everyone on the planet, and got forced by Microsoft to make Windows Phones.
hmmm guess what troll!!
HTC started out by designing phones with windows mobile then moved to android
the phones were the best u could buy. HTC got lost when they got too big too quickly and there manufacturing went down the pan!
I’m guessing that you didn’t look at the URL you typed in. You seem to think that this is Endgadget, they looooooooove Trolls over there, you’ll feel much more at home.
These specs are realyl rather underwhelming if you are buying sim-free. At £300 there are plenty of lower end devices in the WP7 arena. There are a couple of Acers and the ZTE Tania but even if you wanted to bump it up to a slightly more respected mobile brand, the Samsung Omnia W (same ram & processor speed but with S.Amoled screen) and HTC Radar are available for less than that.
It might be different when on contract, as I know they were going for $50 on 2 years in the US, but the sim-free price seems a bit much for a fairly average spec phone with a not-so-popular-but-still-good OS.
“… and basically said, don’t buy Android, it’s got crap apps.”
This is still true.
As an Android user, I can attest to this. But, you know, we’re getting there…slowly.
I’ll bite…
NOM NOM NOM NOM
I wouldn’t call a £300 handset (off network) a budget phone. You can get many off network and PAYG Android handsets for under £100. Some costing less than £80.
Pingback: Tech-Week review: Nokia Lumia 710 | Tech-Week