On January 20, dozens of New Zealand police’s elite special forces broke into Kim Dotcom’s mansion with assault helicopters, M4A3 automatic weapons, Glock pistols, dogs, sledgehammers and even a circular chainsaw, as if they were expecting a vicious narco gang waiting inside, armed to the teeth.
What they found instead was two kids (three and four years old); a 15-month old baby; some Filipino nannies; two security guards; Dotcom’s bodyguard Wayne Tempero; Dotcom’s wife, and meganerd Kim Dotcom himself, hiding in the security room you can see in the video above.
Tempero told the story of how the Kiwi cops assaulted the Megaupload founder’s home and how they captured Kim himself to Kiwi news channel 3news. It sounds pretty scary and way out of proportion, given the nature of the alleged offense and the people involved.
The operation started at 6:45, when the thunder of the assault helicopters woke up the body guard and everyone in the house. He stepped outside to see the helicopters, when a policeman in a bulletproof vest asked him to surrender. According to the report, he didn’t have any weapons, and complied. He also said that he couldn’t even hear them identifying themselves as police officers because of the sound, but obviously these weren’t low-rent kidnappers.
As this was happening, the elite squads and police officers were going around the house, smashing doors and looking for Kim Dotcom with their dogs. In the childhood area they found the kids and the Filipino nannies. According to Tempero, the police asked the Filipino nannies—who must be famous in New Zealand for their ferocity and skills in explosives manufacturing—if they had any bombs.
They also found the wife, who tried to give them the code to open the door to Kim Dotcom’s quarters before they attempted to slam the doors down. Dotcom had run to his secure Red Room, where he stayed for 30 minutes until he was apprehended. On the way to get him, the police smashed an old elevator door thinking it was the gate to a secret room.
Tempero says that the whole thing was out of proportion, and it sure seems like it. He says that Dotcom, who apart from his bad taste and huge appetite, seems like any regular nerd, and “would have complied with everything, we would have sat at the large table, he would’ve probably offered them breakfast and he would have complied with everything.” Of course, he is his bodyguard, but it doesn’t seem like an outlandish claim to me.
So why did the New Zealand government send this brutal group of forces to take down a fat nerd, his wife and his kids?
I’m sure they knew who was in the family mansion as well as the impossibility of Dotcom erasing evidence about his activities—which they already had and it was pretty damn huge. It seems reasonable to think that this is something that the FBI and any police halfwit working on the case should have known about.
The only plausible explanation, apart from being super-extra-careful because they thought that John McCain may be hanging around somewhere, is that they wanted to set an example. Perhaps the Hollywood moguls who were so eager to set an example and scare every other download service in the world pushed for it? Or maybe these New Zealand policemen watch too many of their movies.
In any case, the fear strategy has worked: download services all around the world—many of which are used legimitally—are either shutting down for good or closing access to people in the United States.
Just like in the movies. [3news via Torrentfreak]








What….I mean, WHAT? I can’t fathom how this could be rationalized. And yet, no one will answer for it.
I believe this is what they do to serial criminals that make $50m a year and launder money, or I hope it is.
Does he own kim.com? Be silly not to if that’s your name and you got all the wonga, and please registered the domain before you change your name, otherwise you got to get kim.net.
If they tried a conventional knock on the door first and say, he shot a howitzer at them then fair enough. “This guy created a website where people uploaded videos they own which we also own. RAID HIS MANSION WITH 50 SWAT MEMBERS AND 3 BLACK HAWKS” seems just a tad excessive to me.
The guy has a long history of crime, read up on him, and found with a shotgun next to him. The guy didn’t run a site that allowed people to upload videos you own that others also own, who you trying to convince on that one? He charged money to allow people to access copyrighted material on a vast scale knowingly, if he didn’t he wouldn’t have lived the lifestyle he did, he was wanted for this plus racketeering, and laundering money, had a bunch of fake passports, has a lot of other stuff to answer for – plus know pictures of him posing with guns means they have a right to be heavy handed in the arrest.
This isn’t a geek running something like the thepiratebay, which is fine in my book, totally different person and ballgame, he is a digital gangster with a series of ‘know’ crimes under his belt, I think a lot more will come out during this investigate and documentary after the fact.
So don’y be trying to paint this guy as innocent fighting for freedom because he isn’t that, Al Capone was imprisoned for far less.
And don’t use the excuse that other people are doing worse crimes then this, so we should be dealing with them first – where do you draw the line on that one, let all other know criminals walk free uninvestigated as we focus on just catching mass murders and rapists, while society falls apart.
@markcgrant
Would you care to back up those assertions with facts?
“Found with a shotgun next to him” in reality means one “was found in an open safe meters away”. And if this was such a big part of his arrest, why is he not up on weapons charges?
“The guy has a long history of crime” in reality means “Kim Schmitz was convicted of computer hacking in Germany in 1998, fined and given a suspended sentence. In 2002, he was convicted of insider trading, fined and placed on probation. He has never been convicted of a criminal act anywhere else in the world.” So this only qualifies as a long history if a long equals two incidents over a decade ago.
http://blogs.canoe.ca/parker/general/hang-the-pirates-%E2%80%94-but-start-with-the-movie-moguls-and-record-execs/
I’m surprised not to see a McDonalds drive through at his pad.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
It’s because he’s FAT!
FAT PEOPLE EAT!
You’re funny. You know that? I like you.
Pingback: Pat Forde Is an Unmitigated Douche | UConn By The Numbers