AIM, Gchat, FaceTime, and iMessage — too many ways to communicate between too many different devices. Not anymore. The new Messages app — available as a beta from OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion — fixes that. This is how our fingers will talk now.
Messages replaces iChat as your Mac’s default IM client. You can download it here, and the only thing you have to adjust to is a new Messages window, which serves as a master command center for textual dispatches, tying in everything Apple’s been doing with instant messaging with existing services. You can start a FaceTime conversation using the same program you use for AIM. Or Google Talk. Or Jabber. Want to text your friends, and you’re sitting at your laptop? No need to pick up your phone — just use Messages and send unlimited iMessages, just like you would on your handset.
One wrinkle is the matter of accounts. As much as Messages is wonderfully coherent, every time you select a pal to chat, you’re confronted with a panoply of options: AIM, Gchat, iMessage (with a phone number), iMessage (with an email address), and possibly more. There’s also some weirdness with FaceTime not working correctly — why can I only send the invite to Matt’s phone when he’s also using Messages? — and duplicate notifications on my laptop and phone. But remember, this is a beta. Of the future.
This is, fundamentally, a wonderful consolidation of talking. It’s also setting a course for the future of how we talk without speaking. People are massively more available no matter where they are or what gadget they’re hands are on, the stratifications melting away. With one system that covers every piece of technology you own, the days of worrying about texting outside of your wireless carrier, finding your friend’s screen name, or waiting for someone to sign into Gchat are gone. If you want to be, Apple will let you be reached everywhere, and reach anyone from anywhere, more or less seamlessly. All you need is a phone number or email address, and you’re plugged in. The ways this makes AIM and SMS look relatively archaic should be more than apparent.
So yes, Messages marks a strong (possibly fatal) attack against AIM and SMS. AOL’s old standby has always been the gold standard for iChat, and texting, it goes without saying, has been the ubiquitous way we message someone on their phone for over a decade. Now it’s all one stream. iMessage my computer, iMessage my iPad, iMessage my phone. It doesn’t matter. Texting is now IMing, and vice versa.
But wait, what if your friends use… Android? You’ll be second class citizens to one another, it seems. The Messages app is the apotheosis of iMessage, incentivising that over every other way of sending a message. Likewise, if you’re on Android, Ice Cream Sandwich makes Google Talk an alluring place to subsume all of your chatting. We’ve now got a two-party universal IM system in a state of enmity, and as both become smoother and more expansive, the necessity to choose sides might make communicating harder with some people as it makes communicating much more graceful with the rest. Messages is a decent interchange between the two sides of the rail, but it makes the opposition more vivid (and antagonising) than ever. Even in beta, it’s already great, but like everything else in futurity, it might not turn out wholly good.









Google Chat seem to work pretty much everywhere, web, Android, PC, Mac, iPhone, Linux..
Why bother with messaging systems that only work partially..
iMessage works perfectly for me because most of my friends and family have iphones. Provided everyone has upgraded to iOS 5 then they automatically use iMessage everyday and can be contacted on it 24hrs (provided their phones are on of course!).
Whereas the other IMs rely on other people installing and app and being logged on. If most of my friends used Android then it would be a different matter. I think it really is down to the individual user and who they stay in contact with.
As usual Apple completely ignore established standards like XMPP and design something completely proprietary in order to tie users to their services and products.
This is a step backwards in having a portable online ecosystem.
“OS X Messages: This Is the Future of IM” – Really? It’s not like there aren’t other messaging apps/programs that work on more then just an ‘i’ device.
As stated Google Chat is a good example.
Or how about MSN which for a long time has and is available for nearly EVERY platform widely used today: iphone / android / pc / mac / linux / web / wp7 / blackberry / ipad / even an xbox! … you can talk to everyone not just Apple users. For Free.
Am I just not getting what’s special about iMessage? or … ? ( Hoping someone enlightens me with something I have not heard about )
Do people even use AIM, Google Talk or Jabber? =/
Make a messages app for iOS that allows you to use multiple services for a unified inbox like the OS X application AND add more services like facebook, msn, google talk and perhaps Whats App. Boom, I can message most people I know without touching SMS.
The viewpoint in this article is moronic. It celebrates what it calls the “future of IM” only at the end admitting that it only works on iDevices and acting like it’s no big thing. Bollocks! the idea that the future of communication between people shouldn’t be cross platform is fanboy blindness of the worst kind.
I’ve had a play with the beta and as it stands it’s not overly useful, unless I can’t find my phone and urgently need to text the better half.
Now, if my phone number could be associated with Messages on OSX so that if someone sent me a text message I’d receive it on the Mac, and I could reply as if I was sending from my mobile number, then it might be of more use, especially if when I got to my phone the message thread was there for me to continue with when out and about.
It seems some commenders didn’t quite understand what this is about. This is about a messaging system that seamlessly syncs your conversations with all your devices. I’ve tried the beta version and it works brilliantly; I start a conversation on my Mac at work, continue my conversation on my phone and come to back to the Mac. So far it hasn’t missed a beat.
With regards to Google chat, etc, iMessage supports all sorts of protocols (even Bonjour for some reason), albeit a rather limited list at the moment. I have configured Google Talk, AIM and iMessage.
If I understood the article correctly, the point about “the future of IM” refers to the concept of IM conversations being sync’ed in real time between all sorts of devices, portable or otherwise.
Why does the article say that it will make communicating with Android users a problem then?
As others have said, any decent message system needs to be universal. Who wants to use a system where they can’t contact certain people due to them not owning Apple devices. That’s just stupid.
I’m not sure you read the article or indeed my post. As I mentioned earlier, I have configured GTalk on iMessages on my Mac. Until now with iMessages for the Mac, I only used Google Talk on my Android phone.
maybe i’ve never grown up with IM’ing but I don’t really get this. Especially commenters arguing which is the best IM service.
When I recently upgraded to iPhone4S, I thought wow, I get free iMessages to selected friends and family… but, so what? i’ve got unlimited texts, so do most people i know, or at least 300+ texts.
SMS is the by far the best messaging for me. i don’t recall anyone i know who doesn’t have this capability. most people sitting at a laptop have their phone sitting right there next to it. why shift your short messages to a laptop when you’ve got a dedicated device already?