The file-sharing landscape is slowly adjusting in response to the continued push for more anti-piracy tools, the final Pirate Bay verdict, and the raids and arrests in the Megaupload case. Faced with uncertainty and drastic changes at file-sharing sites, many users are searching for secure, private and uncensored file-sharing clients. Despite the image its name suggests, RetroShare is one such future-proof client.
The avalanche of negative file-sharing news over the past weeks hasn’t gone unnoticed to users and site operators.
From SOPA to Megaupload, there is a growing uncertainly about the future of sharing.
While many BitTorrent sites and cyberlockers continue to operate as usual, there is a growing group of users who are expanding their horizons to see what other means of sharing are available if the worst case scenario becomes reality.
Anonymous, decentralised and uncensored are the key and most sought-after features. For some, this means signing up with a VPN to make their BitTorrent sharing more private, but new clients are also generating interest.
Earlier this month we wrote about Tribler, a decentralised (not anonymous) BitTorrent client that makes torrent sites obsolete. We’ve covered Tribler for more than half a decade, but it was only after our most recent post that it really took off with more than a hundred thousand downloads in a few days.
But there are more file-sharing tools that are specifically built to withstand outside attacks. Some even add anonymity into the mix. RetroShare is such a private and uncensored file-sharing client, and the developers have also noticed a significant boom in users recently.
The RetroShare network allows people to create a private and encrypted file-sharing network. Users add friends by exchanging PGP certificates with people they trust. All the communication is encrypted using OpenSSL and files that are downloaded from strangers always go through a trusted friend.
In other words, it’s a true Darknet and virtually impossible to monitor by outsiders.
RetroShare founder DrBob told us that while the software has been around since 2006, all of a sudden there’s been a surge in downloads. “The interest in RetroShare has massively shot up over the last two months,” he said.
“In January our downloads tripled when interest in SOPA was at its peak. It more than doubled again in February, when cyberlockers disabled sharing or shut down entirely. At the moment we are getting 10 times more downloads than in December 2011.”
RetroShare’s downloads at Sourceforge

RetroShare’s founder believes that there is an increased need for security, privacy and freedom among file-sharers, features that are at the core of his application.
“RetroShare is about creating a private space on the Internet. A social collaboration network where you can share anything you want. A space that is free from the prying eyes of governments, corporations and advertisers. This is vitally important as our freedom on the Internet is under increasing threat,” DrBob told TorrentFreak.
“RetroShare is free from censorship: like Facebook banning ‘obscene’ breast-feeding photographs. A network that allows you to use any pseudonym, without insisting on knowing your real name. A network where you will not face the threat of jail, or being banned from entry into a country for an innocent tweet.”

It’s impossible to accurately predict what file-sharing will look like 5 years from now. But, a safe assumption is that anonymity will play a more central role than it ever has.
Recent crackdowns have made operators of central file-sharing sites and services more cautious of copyright infringement. Some even went as far as shutting down voluntarily, like BTjunkie.
In the long run this might drive more casual downloaders to legitimate alternatives, if these are available. Those who keep on sharing could move to smaller communities, darknets, and anonymous connections.
Republished with permission from TorrentFreak. Image via Shutterstock/John David Bigi III













Swedish File-Sharing Group Recognised as a Religion
ISPs Lose Appeal Over Digital Economy Act's File-Sharing Crackdown
File-Sharers Buy 30 Percent More Music Than Non-Sharers
Why can’t people who are in to filesharing make a decent GUI for their programs?
Hackers don’t care about how things look, they just want function. Take Linux GUIs like Gnome for example. Ugly as sin. (I’m a longtime Mac OS X user, forgive me)
It’s not so much that it’s ugly, as it’s just plain. Which makes it the ideal canvas to build on top of.
In defense of Gnome, it runs a lot faster than KDE! (I will add that I found the lightweight desktops harder to get used to, though. But they also have the upside of greater customization.)
As a Linux user I feel the need to correct you. Gnome 3 looks nice, it’s being usable that it’s bad at.
Too many people complain about Gnome 3 just because it’s different. What’s your actual fault with it besides it being monstrously beautiful?
lol where to begin? Only one program showing at once, the panel being at the top of the screen, the window buttons being massive. The whole thing is just one massive step backwards.
What about transmission, for OS X. Both form and function, IMO.
*Googles* It’s a bit plain.
http://interface.sf.net is an alternative second client and has a much smarter gui and new iconset, it is ideal for new users with this tool / net.