Sony's latest £600 Alpha camera sure looks like a budget DSLR, huh? Well it is. But our hands-on today has us thinking it might just perform above its paltry price tag.
The A57 handles as well as any budget DSLR we've ever tried — even better at times. The camera is a tweaked version of the 2010 A55 — except that Sony actually made the camera larger rather than smaller. Equipped with an updated 16.1-megapixel, APS-C sensor and Bionz processor, improved low-light handling to ISO 16000, continuous shooting at 10FPS, built-in digital viewfinder, and 1080p recording at both 24 and 60 FPS. It may not seem like they changed a lot, but the little things add up.
And there are cosmetic changes, too, with an improved grip and larger body. It seems counter-intuitive, I know, but the result is that the camera feels sturdier to hold — like a real, big-kids camera, and not just like something you cheaped out on.
What do you get? Well first of all, you get a freaking fast camera. This A57's shutter release peels off frames as fast as any other we've tried. Pardon the lofty comparison here, but the 10FPS, machine-gun continuous shooting is the closest thing we've felt to the crazy-fast £4800 Nikon D4 we tried back at CES.
Unlike Sony's NEX cameras, which ditch the mirrored design altogether, this camera uses Sony's Alpha-series lenses, which means the camera can get better, faster autofocus than other-post DSLR shooters. I used the camera to shoot a bunch of quickly moving subjects in super-fast continuous mode, and I was very impressed at how quickly the camera could adapt to changing conditions.
The major downside of SLT cameras — single-lens translucent — is that they have digital, rather than the optical viewfinders on single-lens reflex cameras. Digital viewfinders are far from ideal, and they drive purists crazy, but I actually found the SLT's viewfinder to be quite good and very usable.
As for image quality — that's what this is all about at the end of the day — our limited time with the camera was far from enough for a final verdict. We didn't get to test the camera's supposedly beastly low-light performance, but in good lighting conditions the camera delivered sharp-looking images.
Without doing a full review, it's hard to say whether SLTs might be the future of the budget DSLR — but from what we've seen, we're pretty confident it might be.