Nokia’s 808 PureView made a big splash and caused a fair bit of controversy at MWC this year. 41 actual megapixels crammed into a cameraphone? It sounds ludicrous, especially when you hear it’s running Symbian. The 808 PureView will be out around the start of June, so we grabbed some time with it to see if that beastly sensor is really everything Nokia promises it’ll be.
While Symbian doesn’t interest us much, we will admit to being fascinated by that camera sensor, which is what this hands-on write-up will mostly focus on. (Pardon the pun.) With Nokia already stating they’ll release a Windows Phone 7 version at a later date, consider this a taste of something far greater, to come.
The PureView technology that powers the 808 was born out of a partnership between Nokia and Carl Zeiss, that apparently kicked off five years ago following a drunken conversation in a bar. Zeiss supplied the optics know-how, while Nokia brought that colossal image sensor, plus a bunch of advanced proprietary image processing techniques. The result is a camera phone module that’s pretty massive compared to almost every other phone out there. On paper it should let in more light and best most compact cameras, let alone cameraphones.
Let’s get one thing straight: the 808 isn’t exactly thin. It’s a chubby phone, complete with a hulking great big bulge to accommodate the impressive camera. In the hand it doesn’t feel enormous, but it’s pretty top heavy. One nice thing about the camera bulge is that it sits quite pleasantly on your index finger when held in portrait, but there’s just no getting over the size of the thing.
The casing is polycarbonate, but it has had a special ceramic coating applied to it, which boosts durability and makes it feel pleasant to the touch. The 808 feels incredibly solid, and doesn’t flex or creek at all — it’s certainly doesn’t feel cheap or tacky, like other low-end Nokias do.
On first appearance Nokia seems to have made a really odd decision to land the 808 with Symbian Belle. Let me specify: Symbian isn’t absolutely horrendous, but it’s just not what you want from a modern smartphone. The reason behind the platform choice is down to the 808 having been in the works for the best part of five years, and was designed and prototyped before Nokia committed to Windows Phone. Instead of canning it at a late stage and waiting for a Windows Phone-packing PureView to be developed, Nokia decided to finish it up and get it onto the market.
In my limited time playing with the Symbian Belle platform it seemed OK; not on par with Android, iOS or Windows Phone, but decent enough for a “dumbphone.” There was a bit of sluggishness when swiping across screens, but it performed snappily enough actually within apps.
The camera basically is the 808 PureView; everything about the phone is geared up for the camera. In fact, I’d go as far as saying it’s almost like a camera with a phone attached, rather than the other way around. The dedicated shutter button will rouse the camera no matter what you’re doing or whether the phone is locked. It starts up pretty quickly too, which should make you quick on the draw to capture the moment. Nokia’s given the camera a dedicated co-processor, which does all the heavy lifting and makes the camera responsive and snappy. The only slight bit of lag you notice is immediately on saving a full-size photo, but it’s only about the same as you experience with the iPhone 4′s camera, for instance.
Nokia’s camera app is pretty solid, with more options than you can shake a stick at. There are your normal auto and scene modes for macro; portraits; landscapes, and the like, but you can also tweak your photography much, much further than even most compact cameras will allow. With a “customise” option you can play with the ISO; white balance; brightness; contrast; exposure; apply black and white or sepia filters, or even set up some time lapse shooting intervals. There’s also a self-timer, plus the ability to shoot in either 16:9 or 4:3. Nokia’s sadly not given you any automatic HDR options, but you can shoot 3 or 5 bracketed shots with your choice of exposure steps for you to do your own HDR blending when you’re back at base. Of course, you’ve also got resolution settings for 2, 5 or 8-megapixel shots, or you can unleash the full bore of that 41MP sensor.
Let’s chat some more about the 41MP sensor: you’re actually not shooting true 41-megapixel stills. Yes, the full sensor is truly 41MP, but due to the way the sensor is used in either landscape or portrait in 16:9, you can only shoot 34 or 38-megapixel images respectively — not that 30-plus megapixel images aren’t huge and detailed enough, of course.
Although you can easily snap full-sized shots with the 808, Nokia recommends sticking with automatic most of the time, which results in oversampled 5MP images for incredibly crisp shots. Auto mode works well on the whole, although I struggled to get the thing to go into macro focus in automatic. A quick tap and you can shoot in full size, which results in some rather enormous images in the 11 – 15MB range. The detail they contain is quite astonishing, especially when you consider it’s only a camera phone. We didn’t really get a solid opportunity to test real low-light shooting, but the large image sensor size meant indoor shots came out really well. Likewise the xenon flash, which is Nokia’s most powerful to date, did the job well within a couple of metres too.
As you can see from the full size images we’ve uploaded over on our Flickr account, you can zoom right in for details you can’t even see with the naked eye. Zooming in reveals text on faraway buildings; the stalks of dandelions or even the woven detail of fabrics — it can be almost microscopic at times.
There’s also Nokia’s lossless digital zoom, which works as advertised, giving you a smooth three-times zoom without losing detail. It worked well indoors, but 3x isn’t going to get you much closer to those hills in the background. Nokia’s re-worked the thinking behind how you zoom with a camera, and instead of the pinch-to-zoom gesture you might expect, you’ve got a one-finger slide. It means you can do it all with your thumb while holding the phone like a camera, which is so much more intuitive, I found. You can also use the volume rocker to zoom, but the touchscreen works much better in practice.
The camera really is as impressive as Nokia’s claimed. It produces incredibly crisp and true-to-life 5MP shots, with digital zoom that rivals optical zooms. When you open up the full sensor size, you get incredibly-detailed images that are surprisingly crisp and rich all the way down to actual pixel size.
Nokia’s really set the next benchmark for camera phone imaging, and has pretty much made compact cameras and maybe even bridge cameras obsolete. Like I said before (but you may’ve missed, if you skipped down to the concluding paragraphs), it’s almost as if the 808 PureView is a camera with a phone strapped to the back. There’s a big compromise though, and that’s size. The camera components are massive, and makes the whole phone bigger than we’re used to these days.
We’re not even going to say that Symbian is a major compromise for the 808 PureView, because we know you won’t even consider buying this phone while it’s running on that platform. It certainly bodes well for future Lumia Windows Phones with PureView technology though. We know they’re in the works, and if they come out anywhere near as well as the 808 PureView, camera manufacturers ought to be scared. We just hope Nokia can put it on a diet first.
Don’t just take my word for it: we’ve uploaded some of our un-edited photos in full resolution to Flickr so you can judge for yourself. Unfortunately Flickr will only let you download them at up to 2048 x 1154 (41MP is just too big it seems), but we’ll rig something up so you can see for yourselves.
Update: Google+ handles the full image sizes so check out my Google+ album to download the full things for yourself (bottom left under options).















Since you say we are only going to want this phone for the camera maybe you should compare the pictures it takes against the pictures you would get from a proper camera at the same price.
That’s something we’ll look at doing when we do a full review of it.
super
It’ll be an interesting comparison to make but a bit harsh no? I don’t own any cameras with satnav, web browsers etc built in.
Sam the link to the Flickr set doesn’t work at the minute
Here’s the correct link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gizmodouk/sets/72157629874936788/
Thanks for that
It got fudged, but it’s fixed, it’s just taking a while to update. Working on something better though, so sit tight.
I wonder if something like Cyanogen will be ported over to this. That could be pretty good if they get everything working.
You can really notice the model’s bad skin in those images.
The downside of living in an HD world.
Hang on…I’m not sure the woman in the top pic is a model! Sam can probably confirm whether or not that’s true, but let’s not get too bogged down in that sort of stuff yet
Sorry Kat, I’m only going by what’s written as the titles on the Flickr images ‘Indoors model full’ and ‘Indoors model 5MP’
That’s a model, but the lady blowing the dandelion up top is from Nokia.
Gotta be a model.
Only someone paid to wear that outfit would.
Yep it was, err, a bit odd. Felt mega creepy taking those shots with a bunch of sweaty tech journalists.
I take offence !! That is me! At the last gizmodo cosoplay event. The black background with the camera lighting dont do me justice. Plus, those that have met me in person, know, those stockings dont really bring out the color in my eyes.
“With Nokia already stating they’ll release a Windows Phone 7 version at a later date”
Nokia have never said they’re going to put it on WP7…
They will probably put it on WP8 which they’re using on development handsets at the moment, which makes sense WP8 is due out relatively soon.
They have said that #pureview technology would be a big part of their future devices and as they’re commited to Windows Phone, it make sense they’ll bring the two together.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/05/nokia-pureview-windows-phone-confirmed/
And there was a “leaked” WP concept.
http://wmpoweruser.com/nokia-pureview-lumia-windows-phone-device-images-leaked/
I think he was just being a pedant. The leaks have said that they are coming to Windows Phone. Not specifically Windows Phone 7..
Pretty much! But yeah, I think there’s going to be very few, if any, more Windows Phone 7 handsets. All manufacturers seem to be concentrating on Windows Phone 8 now
You just had to put the picture of the cakes at the end didn’t you!
At least it’s lunchtime.
I’d be keen to see this in the hands of a decent photographer
the tonal range looks slightly better than my 4S, but these photos aren’t good examples.
They put out a few Pro photos when the phone was announced..
http://press.nokia.com/products/media/7413/photo/rock-climbing-in-south-africa-captured-with-nokia-808-pureview/
So refreshing for something to live up to the hype for once.
It’ll be interesting to see what other makes & platforms do to compete.
On first glance, the size looks a bit prohibitive for a mobile phone – but once you realise it’s actually a solid Camera AND a Phone it starts looking a little more appealing. A proper camera in your pocket at all times would be very, very handy.
A couple of things for the full review though: how’s the battery life like? And does the video quality match up to the photo quality?
YMMV but Nokia were confident enough to shoot the promo videos for the phone on the phone
e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g7wct1hTRo&feature=player_embedded
Why did Nokia even insist on calling it a ‘phone’? If they have such awesome optics on their hand why didn’t they just do a Samsung and branch out into compact cameras with GSM module and instant sharing…
Does Samsung have a camera with a GSM module? And a Phone that’s also a camera is more appealing (in regards to the fact that it brings everything closer to the one device to rule them all ideal)
Won’t be too many years before we can get this amazing technology in something really slim.
Just think this phone would be too bulky for me.
I think it looks good and I’m looking forward to when they integrate this with Windows phones – in a couple of years WP could be my platform of choice, depending on how the Windows 8 tablet revolution kicks off!
Importantly though, we need these pictures compared side by side with smartphone pictures of the same subject.
Honestly Symbian was a much better choice for it than WP7, the Camera UI of WP is crap. The Pureview one is much better and has many more options.
What would of made this phone great would have been to put Harmatten (Nokia N9′s Meego) on it.
“We’re not even going to say that Symbian is a major compromise for the 808 PureView, because we know you won’t even consider buying this phone while it’s running on that platform.”
Speak for yourself, but personally I’d prefer to buy the phone that supports:
- Full multitasking
- NFC
- FM transmitter
- HDMI-out
- BT 3.0
- Built-in file manager
And that – believe it or not – actually has a good app ecosystem these days thanks to Qt.
I understand that Symbian isn’t for everyone; it requires a certain level of technical understanding to use to its potential (the same could easily be said for Android, however). But to be so brazen in your words without even offering a reason is just poor journalism.
I have to wonder how much your content is informed by objective criticism as opposed to shameless audience pandering.
And this is another “dumb” statement: In my limited time playing with the Symbian Belle platform it seemed OK; not on par with Android, iOS or Windows Phone, but decent enough for a “dumbphone.”
Those OS that cannot Fully Multitask, no NFC, no file manager, no FM transmitter etc must be called Damn-dumb-phone, right?
The reasons I wouldn’t get the current iPhone and Windows Phone is precisely because they are dumbphones pretending to be smart.