Samsung’s next Galaxy teaser made a big deal about criticising fans of other brands of mobile phone, famously describing them as sheep. But, in revealing the Galaxy S III, isn’t Samsung simply crowning itself king shepherd of the feature-cloning flock?
Let’s get one thing out of the way first. This isn’t an attack on the Galaxy S III. It looks nice. It’s slim; seems pretty enough in the slightly bland, functional Samsung way we’ve come to expect; has a large screen, and some decent software that should offer a genuine improvement over Samsung’s previous collection of Touchwiz tools.
We would definitely have one, no doubt about that.
But there’s not a huge amount of originality in here, or groundbreaking hardware design, especially when this is the hot new thing from a company so keen to mock other mobile phone makers (and their users) in the hope of making itself look edgy and appear to stand out from the crowd.
In fact, it looks like Samsung has rather sheepishly copied plenty of software features from a wide range of current Android models, making the S III more of a homogenised mixture of the best that’s currently available on the market, rather than a cutting-edge new thing deserving of your £500 and granting its maker permission to publicly deride the competition.
It’s not a new record; it’s a greatest hits compilation with two new tracks.
Take the camera software: Samsung’s proud of its burst mode capturing and the ability to pick your best shot from the resulting collection of images. Which is lovely, but is also literally the exact same feature as the one HTC has been shipping with its new HTC One series of phones, executed in the same manner.
Samsung’s herd of software developers has meekly bleated in HTC’s direction and copied a great feature.
Samsung’s also included custom S Voice voice recognition features in here, that go above and beyond the standard Android voice control features that are part of the usual Google feature set. Again, you might say (loudly and clearly so it can understand) that Samsung took an iPhone 4S and decided how best to take the good parts of Apple’s Siri software and use them for itself.
Dropbox integration is another key point for Samsung here, with the maker highlighting how Galaxy S III buyers will be able to enjoy 50GB of storage space for their photos. Again, that seems to be based around copying the exact same promotion offered by HTC, although at least Samsung has changed the numbers, with Galaxy S III buyers getting 50GB of additional space, double that offered by HTC’s One range. That’s innovation for you.
So, to stretch Samsung’s own farmyard analogy a little further, you could say the Galaxy S III has been assembled by mechanically separating the best bits of meat from the carcasses of other popular modern smartphones, then assembling them all into one big, tasty, lamb, pork, chicken and beef burger.
It’ll probably taste great, as long as you don’t analyse it too much or imagine the faces of the poor various animals while snorting it down.
However, that’s needlessly mean. There are some exciting things within the S III. The PopUp Play video app looks like a useful thing Samsung managed to think up all by itself, plus the facial recognition tools within the camera app may well be rather useful, as will the phone’s eye-tracking stuff, should it actually work as advertised.
And like we said, the Galaxy S III looks like it’s a generally useful phone with some handy features right across its plasticky board, regardless of whether Samsung created them or cloned them itself from somewhere else.
We look forward to sheepishly buying one, along with millions of other Android fans.
But perhaps Samsung ought to cut down on the throwing of stones from within its Gorilla Glass house in future.













This is exactly how I felt when reading up on it this morning.
I think the hype and marketing for the S3 has been pretty awful, I really hate the ‘designed for humans’ tagline as it is arrogant and patronising in that it feels as if it undermines people in general.
They should have kept the whole thing understated, and it would have come across more positive, as the change wasn’t so revolutionary, as it was evolutionary. As stated, a lot of features they presented have been borrowed in some form by others, and only small aspects of it were original.
I think the unpacked event presentation was a mess, and pretty poor, they really needed to do a 15 minute presser, and let the phone sell itself without all the bourgeois crap, because that has hurt their reputation in this regard.
I still have high hopes for the S3 to prove itself when reviews, and benchmarks show what its capable of, but it certainly isn’t even close to being a black sheep of the family of smartphones on the market.
I agree. It was all quite poorly executed. I dislike negative advertising campaigns. I didn’t mind the whole Galaxy S 2 owner speaking to friends in the queue because it was phone-feature based but the most recent lot isn’t.
The phone should speak for itself without marketing gibberish slapped onto it. Given all the hype surrounding it in the media it should have just been: look at this great new phone – it doesn’t need marketing, it doesn’t need samsung hype, its awesomeness speaks for itself.
They even got caught up in RIM’s awful ‘wake up’ advertising nonsense down in the colonies.
Hopefully they’ll learn for next time.
Tbh, I’m wondering about that photo. It seems like that phone could just slip out of her hand in a moments notice into the water and why is there a dog there?
It’s clearly because dogs are Samsung’s next target audience.
“Don’t be a human, buy our dogphone now!”
Well, now that instagram has made retro and android a ‘cool’ combination, they thought they’d invest some R&D in the old dog-n-bone to carry on the theme
The dog is there because it is about to be reminded of the greater amount of love it received as a smaller and more manageable beast – illustrated by the fawning adoration present within the photograph it is soon to be forced to view in a cruel color-muted world. That Super AMOLED will most certainly be lost on it.
The dog comes with the phone; due to the amount of times the phone slipped out of “human” hands it was found that it was more productive to have a Samsung helper dog fetch it for you.
If you call other smartphone buyers sheep – people who may well consider your products next time they’re looking for a phone – all you’re doing is potentially alienating a target audience.
“that go above and beyond the standard Android voice control features”.
So above and beyond in fact, it has become Siri.
http://www.cultofmac.com/164891/samsungs-innovative-new-s-voice-feature-looks-exactly-like-siri-image/
I just thought they were having a dig at Apple / the Apple brand loyalists.
Essentially this is what Apple’s marketing has been since day 1, all those years ago. Think different, PC users are boring wankers, etc. Samsung has just been more direct. I’m not sure why Gizmodo has gotten it’s knickers in such a twist over the sheep thing. Pretty much every article Sam wrote regarding the S3 since the teaser made a reference to how annoying he found the sheep thing.
I agree with this article, but isn’t that the point of how great it is. They took on the slimmest phone, box ticked, took on the fastest phone, box ticked, took on the HD screen, box ticked, removable high energy battery, ticked, best storage, ticked, software features, ticked, etc…
We can say for sure in the next six months, you are going to have smartphone’s that match one or two of these impressive features, but not all of them. It has taken on every feature of a smartphone and killed it, and you people want more!?
It is twice the phone as the phone they had last year, no debate, that has broken Moore’s for three years now, no debate, and you people want more!? I can see a distinct lack of understanding technology here, a distinct lack of realising where you are and where you are going.
Samsung give you a stunning galaxy but you wanting the whole universe. That isn’t their mistake but people’s outlandish grip on reality at play. they will get the phone they want but you are going to have to wait three years, and that’s the roadmap, not that twisted irrational dream they got in your noggin.
Just conclude these aren’t the droids you are looking for, and fold on a few years.
I believe it is fitting to call a sheep a sheep – if it looks like a sheep, smells like a sheep, bleats like a sheep, and tastes like a sheep, it may be wise to call it out as being a fucking sheep.
That all assumes that people purchase products on a rational, quantifiable basis!
Personally, I reckon that if Samsung had followed Apple and HTC and ditched removable batteries and storage for a high-quality unibody case that felt good in the hand they would have won hands-down.
Sure, there would have been a vocal minority who’d have complained (despite never having bought a second battery for their phones) but any sales lost to them would have been more than made up from people holding the phone in-store and buying on the basis of a “premium” feel (which, let’s be honest, is what gets the iPhone so many of its sales).
I don’t buy this, doesn’t feel good in the hand line, it is deeply subjective thing. But a benchmark, longer battery and removable battery and SD cards aren’t subjective.
When I get a new phone I go online and get the max SD card my new device will take and 2 spare batteries and a extra charger.
If I couldn’t fit a extra battery a the phone or fit SD cards then I really wouldn’t consider it. To make a phone that shoots full HD video and not have an SD card slot is a major mistake, it is plain stupid, and don’t talk cloud rubbish concerning HD video, that is a joke with the UK connection limits. I also don’t like haven’t a phone tethered to a laptop half a day or on constant charge so I can get some use out of the bastard thing, again plain stupid. It is a flaming mobile device, key word their is mobile.
Then people say you don’t need all that power, storage and battery as it is just a phone, but that is wrong, if you are just making calls then get some Nokia £15 rubbish. Phone calls is now one of the least used features on a so called smartphone, and that is why I call it a mobile device. If you want to get fair use of shooting and watching HD video on a mobile device then:
1. You need Juice
2. You need vast storage in the device
3. You need a big screen
And people don’t buy iPhone because how they feel in the hand, or why waste billions on fancy sales rooms and marketing.
I think you make a fine point if the SIII doesn’t top the SII sales, if it does then your outlook on what makes a quality device is out of step with the British population. People said the same thing about the SII, they were wrong.
And frankly I look at the iPhone 4S next to the SII in a video posted here and the 4S looks retro, seriously looks dated to me, the design looks dated the whole UI is twee and seriously old looking, I see the Safari logo, stupid name for a browser, and it harks of Netscape Navigator. They wonder why the sales and going to the Galaxy lines, apart from having one for every pocket, the 4S looks like a phone you should have had three years ago.
Apple spends a huge amount of money on its stores precisely because it knows that touching and using its products contributes to a sale. Even third party shops will inevitably have iPads and iPhones for people to paw.
I agree with you about the S3′s features but I still feel they’re out of step with the majority of buyers. The fact that the iPhone has been outclassed for around 18 months but still sells so well is proof that quantitative factors are not crucial when it comes to buying decisions.
I’d say the iPhone has yet to be outclassed; it sells well because it’s an excellent device. I think Samsung are currently getting the nearest to matching that level of success. One of these days one of their Galaxy devices might outsell the iPhone, and that’ll be the day when when Apple has been “outclassed”.
Great article Gary
The voice thing has been in Samsung phones for ages now, Probably even before the 4s.
I remember seeing an advert with an eskimo who couldn’t use the screen because of his fat mittens go “Hey galaxy – blah blah blah”
Tbh it was aimed at iPhone people.
Personally it applies to anyone who blindly buys anything just because of the name.
Spot on. I think it’s suffered similar to the iPhone 4S: we expected the world and instead got a continent. It’s a brilliant phone, just not at all what it was hyped to be.
I would love to see an ad campaign for an absolutely groundbreaking new phone that goes, “We’ve made a phone, we think it’s kind of a big deal, but we’re probably suffering from ‘mummy loves me’ syndrome. Those Iphones are pretty tough to beat. COme on lil phone, mummy loves you!”
I think the problem here is that people want to be amazed by a new product without having any idea of what they’d classify as “amazing”.
The truth is that the last revolutionary feature on a mobile phone was the introduction of multi-touch on the original iPhone. Apart from that, smartphones are just more refined versions of the same formula that has been around for 15 years – a rectangular touch screen with a cellular phone built in.
As for the sheep comment, it’s exactly the same sentiment that Apple managed to capture simply (if not grammatically) with “Think Different”. It also seems a bit odd for the world’s largest phone manufacturer to say that people who don’t buy its phones are following the herd!
Generally, people seem to expect completely unrealistic things, whether that be because their production hasn’t yet been perfected, or because they aren’t yet economical to put in a £500 device. But you’re right, all we are seeing now are incremental updates to the basic touchscreen formula that Apple brought us in 2007. I wonder when we’ll get another monumental shift, and I wonder if it’ll be Apple who deliver it again?
The Next step forward will be what i’ve seen apple messing around with.
Sorry i cant recall the name for it. (haptic textured stuff is it?)
A sense of texture on a screen.
yeah..
That will be a nice step forward.
Bring on that technology.
I wouldnt say samsung dropped the ball here, everything is an improvement.
just as with anything that comes with hype, it always disappoints.
I’m sure this phone will be fine, as will samsung.
But i cant wait for future advances worth talking about.
Who will win that race?
People have been playing with the texture touch stuff for years, not an Apple thing, but that reeks of gimmick to me.
I seriously think the main issue is we aren’t going to be blown away by mobile devices for a few years, but then a while back we all wanted quad-core HD phones, now we got them we are already thinking about octo-core full HD devices, I think we are now officially a spoilt generation of brats.
But like the good old laptop they do the job, the market is defined, and will only get refined here on in. You are going to get better screens, more horse power, extra juice but they kind of do everything already. They are now just mobile computing devices, that will be tweaked over the next few years, expecting anything more is silly – it is defined.
It is like what The Doctor states here, people want to be amazed but seem to fall short of defining what will amaze them, you put the question to them and they go quiet. You are the first person I have heard constructively say what you would like, other than those spolit brats moaning about pixel peeping at a 4.8″ 720p screen, life and fucking get one, I suggest to them – geeks without portfolio.
But people talk of all the Samsung hype, what hype? The Next Galaxy, how dare they, all the hype was all the leaks and speculation outside Samsung. Samsung just put on an event and said this is the new phone it does what it says on the tin.
Seriously, if people what to list what phone and features they would have on the phone then list them away, but you got to bring in within a £500-550 budget, or £30-35/month, go ahead – but you will fail and while you fail at that just think that Samsung didn’t.
I don’t know if I would call it a Gimmick. Having trained people to use the accessibility functions with the iOS range, something like this could make someones experience 1000% better.
As for being spoilt.. I can kind of agree. I’m always the first one to drool over the specs of a machine, but I normally write that from a Black MacBook, or iPhone 4. How the technology applies to me is one thing, but how it affects the industry and the end user in general is another.
If the industry can advance, it needs to.. Yes, we could at this moment produce devices with twice the computation power, but once we can achieve these goals without sacrifice, it needs to happen. Regardless of what the industry is now, or will be.
You’ll find that the industry is a chicken and egg business. The iPhone’s SDK and AppStore, were designed with a specific purpose. But what evolved from that was far beyond any previous expectation. It’s not about designing products for today, but products that will inspire the future generation of change.
Perhaps I don’t need an octo-core smart phone, but what that innovation may lead to is unimaginable. What If the computational power of future smartphones is not focussed on graphics or games, but focused on managing itself efficiently to run on little to no power. What I can imagine is very little in comparison to what these features can do once put in the hands of a million visionaries and developers.
Now If we can still do this whilst staying within $500 dollars.. I will of course be much happier.
My point about octo-core phones, and yes I want one, is that the chips don’t exist yet, we are just constantly ahead of the curve in our own heads. Look at the SIII, greatest phone ever made, at least on paper, sci-fi tech a few years ago, a device that watches you, listens to you, responds to you, and everyone was expecting something more, wholly unimpressed. I really do wonder what they expected? I wonder what will please them? I wonder what they want to do with it, that they can’t already?
The odd thing is I’ll be getting the SIII, but I’ve been thinking I don’t think I’ve really put the SII to the max, apart from the odd top notch game and HD video recording, most people SII’s most be running on 10%, or less, for 90% of the day. I can’t think of an app, other that the odd game, that puts the horse power to the test for practical reasons. We have multitasking, but really who is the guy encoding a video, while solving pi and updating facebook on a mobile?
So at this rate we got about two years till the real quality app stuff is getting made that can make use of a quad core mobile device with a 4G connection – the only reason to upgrade now is bragging rights. I was watching the slick response of the SIII in a video and thought it was kinda the same slick response I get from my SII running Omega 11.1 ICS – and I got a bunch of cool hacked apps on that, like youtube player with download built in. I really think I’d be a dick to upgrade now, but I probably will, I hate my love of technology – I could get a flight to the other side of the world for a few hundred quid extra – I really am a major dick.
These sorts of people really just don’t know what it is they want which is why they are eternally disappointed and dissatisfied with the devices they have or are on offer. I find they are usually the sort of people who change devices very frequently, eternally looking for something that they themselves don’t even know.
“”But people talk of all the Samsung hype, what hype? The Next Galaxy, how dare they, all the hype was all the leaks and speculation outside Samsung. Samsung just put on an event and said this is the new phone it does what it says on the tin.”
Did you miss the teaser trailer? You know the one where they called people sheep? The countdown that lasted for days? The whole “tgeltaayehxnx” thing? thenextgalaxy website? The Samsung unpacked 2012 Android app they made for the launch? All the Samsung tweets? The massive media event that lasted for hours and had a full orchestra? The live stream they had on the website? The partnership with the olympics to promote the phone? The awful advert? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0V557ojdu2o) The popup shops they’re going to stick up all around the country? (Which they shamelessly introduced as a “one more thing” at the end of the event.) Samsung hyped this more than any phone I’ve ever seen and isn’t going to stop.
I’d call that standard marketing, hype is beyond that, often applied to over talked claims and excessive marketing, all that stuff is cheap online social marketing, other than the presentation – really no more or less than what others do.
Wow, this piece is contradictory… Was there a point?
Any analogy eventually breaks down, but this article somehow manages to break the sheep analogy before it was ever a twinkle in a farmer’s eye.
If you take “behaving like a sheep” to mean “copying” (which is in no way the message that this imagery was ever supposed to convey), then of course, Samsung’s wares could be lambasted (pun intended) for imitating aspects of competitor’s products.
What the sheep are more likely supposed to convey is the idea of mindless allegiance to ‘the flock’ without any intelligent, cognitive consideration for where the flock is headed or the potential benefits of abandoning it to see how the grass tastes in another field (most probably an allusion to iPhone users).
“Copied” is certainly a strong word to be throwing about, especially seeing as I perceive that you have misunderstood the reasons for the usage of “sheep” imagery. Nobody becomes ‘expert’ in any field without carefully studying and interpreting innovation that has come previously. A modern-day composer does not create a great Piano Concerto without first studying the conventions established by Mozart, Beethoven, Rachmaninoff, Chopin etc. If anything, the fact that a successful feature is being replicated by a competitor is a compliment to the innovator.
Apple for example, are not great innovators. They spend less on R&D as a percentage of revenue than most comparable tech companies out there. They are simply great (some might even claim ‘insanely great’) at packaging and presenting PRODUCT. Xerox might have something to say to Apple about their “innovation” in GUI OS’s. Bill Gates was certainly eschewing the benefits of Capacitive Touchscreen devices as the future around a decade before Apple popularised them. And Android was successfully handling Notifications on Smartphones long before Apple shamelessly lifted their implementation almost without alteration…And as for Siri, well…they BOUGHT that particular feature!
HTC are (like Samsung), playing with a sandbox that Google have provided them with. Is it such a far-fetched thought that two design teams would come to a broadly similar conclusion about Design and UI? (Especially given the relative restriction of the OS’s reference design). Just how many different ways are there to package a rectangular, touchscreen phone-slab? Why are you making it sound like a dirty thing for convergence to happen where progress is perceived to have been made? It’s the whole reason why some of us are not driving around in cars with 5 wheels, 12 hand-operated clutches and a steam engine, while others drive 3-Wheelers with Bicycle Gearing and a Coal Furnace…In that industry, innovation was met with convention and was followed by subtle evolution prevailing within the agreed standard. Where innovation happened within that sphere (Air Conditioning, or Electric Windows for instance, to use the automotive example), it was swiftly adopted by most Car Manufacturers as the norm.
My point is, unless you are inventing an entirely new category of product, you are always going to find ‘evolution’ rather than ‘revolution’, especially as the category matures. The Galaxy S III is a very good phone on paper, no matter which Frankenstein method brought it to market. It might not tick every box for every person, but as most of us are individuals in Capitalist Democracies, we fortunately hold the right to vote with our wallets and simply not buy the product if we don’t feel it satisfies our needs.
Great reply!
I get cheesed of by comments like “Which is lovely, but is also literally the exact same feature as the one HTC has been shipping with its new HTC One series of phones, executed in the same manner”
Gary has not a product designer / coder and never will be. Because he fail’s to understand that you cannot just copy a feature and code it in a few weeks. Stuff like that takes time and even low level integration. It would have been planed months ago before HTC came out with it. Samsung actually did it better by deleting the ones you did not want.
I really would love to sit down with a load of these self proclaimed “expert bloggers” and ask some real questions of them. Like what would you do and how should they have done it.
I even saw a blog some were complaining that it did not have a flexible screen! WTF would you want a flexible screen on a phone for?
I’m not out to defend Samsung I’m out to defend manufactures from ignorant bloggers who learnt to write but never learnt to think.
I think the main issue here is that Samsung themselves hyped this phone up so much, more than any phone they’ve ever released and more than any phone ever made by any manufacturer. Watching the teaser trailer you’d think (as we all did) that Samsung had something truly revolutionary up its sleeve that would blow us away, in reality it was just an evolution as you say. Which isn’t bad but just not what we were expecting.
I actually worked in a phone shop during the iPhone launches, and the S3 launch is at worst comparable to them. The behind the scene machinations put in place by Apple were revolutionary in itself as they sought to build a lifestyle, let alone a product. To suggest the S3 has been hyped up more than previous iPhone launches is simply ignorance of the facts.
In addition, the specs behind the S3 were pretty much published a month ago by various sources, so I’m not sure exactly what you were expecting. Perhaps the design/build of the product was a little conservative, but who cares? If I want pretty devices I go to Apple and pay a premium for it, the alternative being relatively cheap advanced tech (S3/One X).
I would rather be a sheep, purchasing the same well designed product as everyone else.. than trying to be different, and purchasing a product run by sheep.
Some people are sheep. Some people aren’t.
Then there’s this large portion in between who don’t give a rats ass and read the instructions.
Monkey see, monkey do!!
For everyone who is still disappointed, please read this article.
http://www.androidcentral.com/hype-expectation-and-samsung-galaxy-s-iii