Being a lawyer isn't perhaps as much fun as it seems in the movies, in reality involving weeks of reading incredibly boring documents. Which is why many of them are probably now celebrating, as a recent court ruling suggests that computers can take over part of their job for them.
New Scientist reports that a US judge has approved the use of "predictive coding" — software which can sift through millions of documents and spit out only those the lawyer might need — for use in a case. It's a landmark victory, and looks set to to save massive amounts of both time and money.
Thomas Gricks, the lawyer who was pushing for the use of predictive coding, wanted to use the software to sift through 2 million emails in a case defending aircraft-hangar operator Landow Aviation against private-jet owners seeking compensation after a roof collapse in 2010. He estimated that the emails would take 20,000 person hours to sift though, in the process costing over £1 million. Now, the software will provide just a couple of thousand relevant documents, cutting the time investment to two weeks, and slashing the cost by 98 per cent.
Anyone concerned about the accuracy of the software can rest assured, too. In a recent study, pitting lawyers against the software over the course of 800,000 Enron emails, the software came out on top. In fact, it even manged to spot relevant details that the humans didn't. Now that is progress. [New Scientist and Richmond Journal of Law and Technology]
Image credit: Judge from Shutterstock