Since the end of WWII, America’s naval might has been undisputed and our aircraft carriers have been its crown jewels. However, the days of dominance could end with China’s new DF-21D ballistic missile—the only device on Earth capable of sinking an aircraft carrier—four and a half acres of sovereign US territory—with one shot.
The DF-21D (Dong-Feng 21 variant D) is the world’s first and only anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM). It’s a two stage, land-launched missile with a maximum estimated range of 2,700 to 3,000 km. Its single fuel-air explosive warhead packs 200 to 500 megatons. It was developed by China Changfeng Mechanics and Electronics Technology Academy as part of the country’s massive military modernisation effort, an initiative focused primarily on developing overwhelming missile technologies for which there are no effective defenses. The Defense Department believes it entered active service around 2009.
While the Chinese obviously aren’t saying much on the inner workings of the new missile system, military experts believe it will rely on China’s Over the Horizon radar (OTH) to monitor a 3,000-km swath of the South China Sea, where China is now claiming dominion over. The OTH system bounces its radar signal off the ionosphere to see past the curvature of the earth. If the OTH detects a carrier battle fleet, the system instigates a set of Yaogan satellites to search the area and provide precise targeting data. Additionally, when the OTH detects an approaching fleet, the system will reportedly launch a swarm of micro-satellites into low orbit where they will help refine the targeting data further and transmit it back to the onshore command center. Meanwhile, UAVs will be launched to track the fleet. Once the missile has been launched and separated from its first stage, the warhead employs synthetic aperture radar to find the carrier. It receives real time telemetry data as it locks onto its target and initiates its terminal descent.
This capability could be used to effectively deny US carriers from intervening in, say, the Taiwan Strait. It could also be used as a very large stick in resolving local territorial disputes. Many members of the security community also worry that the FAE warheads could easily be replaced with nuclear ones. If that occurred, it would very lead to an arms race with Japan and India (neither of whom are particularly fond of the Communist PRC). Or, it could dissolve the US-Russian INF Treaty, which prevents the two countries from from deploying short and intermediate range land-based ballistic and cruise missiles. [Strategy Page - Wired - Dept of Defense - SinoDefense - Weapon and Technology]













Nerd moment…. I believe the largest nuclear warhead was around 25 megatons (ss18) so 200-500 megatons seems unlikely. Kilotons. Maybe…
I think the Tsar bomb had a 50MT yield but was utterly impractical as a deployable weapon. With regard to China’s ASBM, I believe it’s why the US is so keen on its SM3 missiles for theatre ABM capability.
Wikipedia says it’s kilotons.
Tonnes, not Mega or even Kilo. Typos of 6 orders of magnitude aren’t acceptable.
Also, don’t all aircraft carriers and their flotillas have extremely advanced fully automatic anti-missile systems? I don’t see why this couldn’t be shot down, it doesn’t sound that exceptional.
It’s not undefeatable, stuff like the Type 45 would have no problem shooting down even a whole swarm of these…
Also, it’s not the first weapon that can kill a carrier with one shot – torpedoes are more than capable!
Can a type 45 (or US warships) engage something of this nature coming right down from the atmosphere at the ship though? (honest question)
It doesn’t need a gun pointing directly at its target. It would launch a viper…capable of travelling over 3,000mph…to shoot it down.
The radar and missile combo means that it can shoot down a Mach 3 cricket ball 74miles away, so jets and missiles aren’t much of a problem.
Nice quote
I served aboard two ‘Aircraft Carriers’ in the Royal Navy, HMS Illustrious and HMS Invincible. The main threat to a carrier isn’t from the sky but from the ever present underhand, sneaky shit submariner.
Also you might want to amend the line about this thing being the only weapon capable of sinking an aircraft carrier. No one had this kind of weapon until the Chinese a few years back, but take a look at this list
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sunken_aircraft_carriers
It does say “with one shot”
I don’t they sunk from being hit with one shot.
Actually, the Illustrious and Invincible (and probably Ark Royal)carried a weapon of their own that was more than capable of sinking a carrier in one shot.
Isn’t that why the Royal Navy spend so much making sure we have the sneakiest submarines and the most underhand shits as submariners?
Re: Article, who cares, the US Navy might be wetting their underwear but we’ve got Type 45s, this is virtually no threat to a Royal Navy carrier group. Now if only we had some carriers…
We do have carriers! We just let the French use them
Well France is just an annex of the UK that we let out right? And its not like the French will actually use them for anything other than running away anyway! :p
america’s had its chance to be the only superpower & it just uses its position to invade other countries (iraq for oil, guatemala for bananas, vietnam for ??) so maybe more than 1 giant power is better