In the late 1990s, Nokia predicted the future of mobile: it spent millions on research, and even demonstrated touch-screen devices that closely resembled todays iPhones and Androids. So why is it only now making a dent on the smartphone market?
The Wall Street Journal has a nice article describing the decision-making processes behind Nokia’s ill-fated last decade. It starts by setting the scene, describing the kinds of devices that were being researched by Nokia over ten years ago:
More than seven years before Apple rolled out the iPhone, the Nokia team showed a phone with a color touch screen set above a single button. The device was shown locating a restaurant, playing a racing game and ordering lipstick. In the late 1990s, Nokia secretly developed another alluring product: a tablet computer with a wireless connection and touch screen-all features today of the hot-selling Apple iPad.
But, alas, having a prototype product up your sleeve and selling it to consumers are two wildly different concepts. Getting between the two requires savvy management foresight — something that the WSJ explains was sadly lacking at Nokia:
Nokia actually developed the sorts of devices that consumers are gobbling up today. It just didn’t bring them to market. In a strategic blunder, it shifted its focus from smartphones back to basic phones right as the iPhone upended the market.
The result? At least two abandoned operating systems and a ginormous tack of patents, which are now valued at around £4 billion and make up almost the entire value of the company, followed by a mad scrabble to enter the smartphone race again. While Nokia only fell from the top spot as the world’s largest maker of mobile phones earlier this year, that was only because it had a massive head start.
Those mistakes almost ten years ago have cost Nokia dear. But now, with its new Lumia range and championing of WinPho, it’s finally daring to be different. Let’s hope it’s not too little, too late. [Wall Street Journal]













Last year my HTC Sensation went on the blink and I was forced to use an old Nokia 9300 for a couple of weeks. For a six year old phone it stood up surprisingly well and if it had had 3G I’d have been quite happy to keep using it.
Saying that they lost makes it sound like the smartphone race for them is over
6 years ago I would have sworn that Nokia was the best and it’s all I’d buy now it’s the complete opposite.. Doesn’t sound like things are going all that well with WP7 either..
Better than RIM.. Just
yeah I think they’re both on the edge of oblvion but at least Microsoft has some money to help Nokia… who’s gonna help RIM
Thorsten is going to rock’n'roll things for them.
Don’t know how you came to that conclusion.
10% share in 2 different countries in the EU, including around 20+ share in finland (and the 10% share is Germany, not exactly a small market).
17% share in China, thats more than Iphone
Just because things arent going well in the UK or USA doesnt really mean much, 400 million people against 6.6 billion elsewhere.
Market Share and profits are two different things.. and it’s Nokia’s profits that aren’t doing well. Shareholders won’t be happy !
Who said Nokia, you said WP7 wasnt doing well, but in some places its doing very well, in some places its doing terrible.
I never said WP7 wasn’t doing well, I only said that Nokia wasn’t doing so well with the WP7 collaboration. Does makes ya think how would Nokia be doing if they had gone android instead of WP7 ?
I don’t think it would of made a difference, its all about brand recognition for most people not the OS. For the average joe on the street WP vs Android means nothing to them.
Take for example my sister, who just bought a new phone (S3), when i asked why she said “because its a samsung”. Same with my other sister who just got an Iphone. Nokia lost its recognition with being a market leader of top notch phones…. The OS on it doesnt make a difference (in my opinion anyway).
Totally agree, Brand recognition is everything these days. My thinking was that if Nokia went Android instead of WP7 they could go wild with the specs on the phones and not be dictated to by Microsoft although that probably wouldn’t have made much difference. who knows
Why is it all wishing well to Nokia but nowt but hatred for RIM in here?
Because Nokia at least seem to be doing something to try and right the ship whereas RIM’s captain seems to be drunk
Thank you
Nokia are being hamstrung by Microsoft in my opinion. WP7 adoption is hardly stellar, and while Nokia is trying to sell as many phones as possible, MS shows the public WP8, and so lots of potential WinPho buyers are now putting purchases off waiting for the new OS. People buying a new Nokia now would be crazy as they won’t get access to the new version … hence 5 consecutive quarters of rubbish results for Nokia. Toxic relationship?
Yes, the announcement of WP8 two months ago is to blame for 5 quarters of poor financial results.. You sir win all teh internetz
Awesome .. never won anything before, especially not teh …
More than seven years before Apple rolled out the iPhone, the Nokia team showed a phone with a color touch screen set above a single button.
UNLEASH THE PATENT DOGS OF WAR!