Scientists worldwide have worked for years to come up with a convincing meat substitute. Whether it’s farmed with soy or synthesised from stem cells, if it tastes real, it will change the world. But not even a £640,000 prize has been enough to make it happen — on Wednesday, with less than a week to spare, the deadline for a PETA-sponsored contest to create in vitro meat was extended until 2013. What’s the problem?
The quest to find a satisfying substitute has become an obsession among guys like me — I’m a vegetarian, but I love the taste of meat, and in the eight years since I stopped eating it, I’ve sought out as many red meat, poultry, and fish reproductions as I could find. I’ve tried Tofurky roasts, soy-rizo breakfast burritos, seitan gyros, and fake duck at myriad Thai restaurants. I’ve had my face and fingers slick with vegan sloppy Joe sauce. So far, the difference between fake and real meat has been obvious. But there are several reasons to believe that might soon change.
To be sure, there have been some profoundly unappetising and backwards fake meat solutions. First, there was cloned meat, and then, Japanese scientist Mitsuyuki Ikeda, came up with a way to make artificial meat from human waste. Good luck getting anyone to eat shitburgers.
Just as hope faded for fake-meat enthusiasts, Fu-Hung Hsieh, a biological engineering professor at the University of Missouri, emerged with a breakthrough. After about a decade of research, in 2010, Hsieh and his colleagues created what is now hailed as the best meat substitute ever, and not because of the way it tastes. The challenge is the so-called mouthfeel — soy ground beef, for instance, simply doesn’t crumble in a hot pan the way real ground beef does. Fake poultry doesn’t shred like real poultry. At least it didn’t until Hsieh came around.
Hsieh’s recipe, which includes ingredients like soy protein, pea protein, and carrot fiber, was purchased last year by a Maryland startup called Beyond Meat. If you’re in the tech world and that name rings a bell, that’s because Beyond Meat is the first food business to attract investment from Evan Williams and Biz Stone, the co-founders of Twitter. A Beyond Meat spokesperson said the company plans on introducing its fake chicken fully into the market in 2013, but for now, you can get the product in a few northern California Whole Foods stores.
And how’s it taste? New York Times food writer Mark Bittman gave it a shot, and he seemed quite pleased, saying, “When you take [Beyond Meat's] product, cut it up and combine it with, say, chopped tomato and lettuce and mayonnaise with some seasoning in it, and wrap it in a burrito, you won’t know the difference between that and chicken. I didn’t, at least, and this is the kind of thing I do for a living.”
Meanwhile over here in Europe, scientists and food companies from Spain to the Netherlands are working on a project called LikeMeat, an attempt to produce better tasting and better textured fake meat for consumers. And at Stanford, vegan biochemistry professor Patrick Brown also believes he’s hit on the next great plant-based “meat,” saying at a press conference in Vancouver that he’s nearing “a product that can compete head on with meat and dairy products based on taste and value for the mainstream consumer.”
No matter how much hard work scientists put in at countless labs around the world, there will always be those who contend that they can tell the difference between fake meat and real meat regardless of whether some fancy New York foodie says he can‘t. My father does this, and at Thanksgiving he calls my Tofurky “rabbit food.” For these people, other scientists are busy devising a way to conjure real meat out of thin air, sans any farming, pollution, or bloodletting whatsoever.
The American animal-rights group PETA put forth an offer in 2008: It would give a £640,000 prize to anyone who could create and bring to market in vitro meat by June 30, 2012. With a little less than a week to spare, PETA extended the deadline for the contest to 2013, to give more time to several labs doing promising work. Andras Forgacs, CEO of a group called Modern Meadow, is the first North American scientist to produce a tissue-engineered meat product. In February, the Los Angeles Times reported that an anonymous private investor put up more than £190,000 to support another project, led by Mark Post, chairman of physiology at Maastricht University in the Netherlands.
Post and his team take pig stem cells and place them into a fetal cow serum, allowing the cells to grow into muscle tissue. The scientists then build that muscle tissue via mechanical tension and electrical shocks, increasing its volume by several hundred per cent. The team hopes to have a prototype burger patty by October.
The very thought of harvesting meat in labs might make many people dry heave before digging into a pork chop. But if you can get past the initial revulsion, the benefits of having plentiful and good meat substitutes are hard to ignore. Imagine a world in which scientists could create steaks that tasted like beef but were also infused with the omega-3 fatty acids prevalent in fish. Or one in which children in third-world countries could enjoy the protein-dense meals kids in the West eat. With fake meat, Post says, make meat production could require 40 per cent less energy than it does now.
That energy reduction figure should stand out to anyone who simply refuses to give up real meat. It’s true that a person should, in most circumstances, be allowed to eat what they want. But a growing body of research shows that eating meat is hardly a personal choice anymore. Perhaps it once was. But today, when the vast majority of meat comes from energy-guzzling, environmentally damaging, downright cruel factory farms, eating meat in the modern world amounts to a personal choice the same way smoking on airplanes used to be a personal choice. Sure, you can do it, but you’re also screwing everyone else. Developing a technology to convincingly imitate meat benefits everyone — because really, deep down, who doesn’t love a cheeseburger?
Image credit: Meat from Shutterstock













The Most Advanced Fake Meat in the World Is Still Gross
DARPA's Almost-Impossible Challenge to Reconstruct Shredded Documents: Solved
Scientists Come Close to Creating Life With Almost-Living Crystals
If there’s one thing I hate, it’s vegetarians that preach that their “choice” is the right choice. I liked the article, right up until your last paragraph. I won’t respond in the negative any further, I’m sure others will do that.
According to that last paragraph, we should give up computers and pretty much any form of manufacturing. Energy crisis solved!
Completely agree with lwsbrts, I think the preaching killed an otherwise neutral article
Agreeing with the others, an interesting article, but the fact of the matter is we have a huge industry built around meat products, and there is a distinct difference between stigmatising smoking, a product with direct second-hand effects on those immediately around you, and stigmatising someone for taking part in an industry that provides something that 99% of humanity has a natural, innate desire to consume. Not an addictive one, a biologically pre-programmed ones.
Ive registered for the first time just to comment on this article. As a regular reader of gizmodo you really messed up this article. I usually ignore many of the pro veggie articles as they are all the same dribble, but being gizmodo i gave this one a go. and was VERY happy with it – until your last para…
I dont care if you dont eat meat – thats your choice. But get off your high horse thinking you can talk about us meat eaters who are “screwing everyone else”. I like eating meat, and i don’t give a damn if animals die in the process. Humans are top of the food chain. U mad?
This. I’ll eat pretty much everything with four legs, two legs or no legs at all.
Atleast, as long as its meat. I can’t eat vegetarian food. I’ve tried nearly thirty different brands and different restaurants and they all resulted in stomach cramps.
That Quorn stuff is the devil. I had stomach cramps so bad I would have sworn my appendix was about to burst if I hadn’t already had it out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quorn#Controversy
Another article written by “Gizmodo”. I wonder if the author was hidden on purpose because of the last paragraph?
Nothing as sinister as that — it’s just creating new author accounts are a bit of a ball-ache, and I couldn’t be arsed doing so over the weekend.
Ah ok, I was hoping for something sinister. It’s more fun when that happens
I think you meant to say “The American terrorist group PETA”
Like mrbeatsontoast, just registered to express how embarrassing this article is for Gizmodo.
No wonder it’s not attributed to any author.
I’ve read the Dune prequles and I know precisely what lab grown meat is!! I’ll keep to my cow and chicken and leave the slig for the veggies.
P.S. That last paragraph is such nonsense. Granted we normals look down on veggies because, lets face it, if you don’t eat meat, you’re not a real person, but to claim we’re screwing everyone else is just dumb. I think it is a fairly safe assumption that the majority of people in the world are meat eaters – if that is case, that would make us the majority and non-meat eaters the minority so the people we are screwing are fellow omnivores, which I, and apparently billions of others are ok with.
Eating meat is not inherently bad for the environment. It is just some (most?) of the ways that meat is produced these days is less than ideal. In saying that I doubt there is any way we could produce the amount of meat that the world consumes using the current environmentally friendly methods so cutting back/new technology has got to be a good thing..
If eating meat was bad for the environment then should we shoot a Lion every time they kill a Zebra for food? It’s only logical seeing that they’re killing the planet too.
Did you read what I said? Its not the eating of it, its the way that its farmed that’s bad..
It was meant to be a tongue-in-cheek comment. Also, I replied to the wrong person :s
I dont understand, eating meat is not a choice, its a habit and addiction, I would not have cared if that choice like drugs, meant that you die, die if u will, but your so called “lifestyle choice” means toturing animals, for your taste buds, so if you think its a right choice, then so is slavery, and abuse of women, some do it for fun! Its a choice!!! And to come to think of it, whats so wrong if vegetarians think they are better human beings, in that context, of notharming innocent beings for selfish reason, we obviously are! I think its better to think we are better beings than you are, rather than think some beings are inferior and hence its ok to torture them!