The last Shooting Challenge was all about the ‘Rule of Thirds’, and you rose to the challenge and submitted some absolutely stunning images, so thanks for taking the time to capture the world around you.
Picking the winner for this challenge was particularly hard given the quality and number of the images submitted. Let me be clear; because of the fab prize on offer and number of entries, I had to be super-strict on the rules (I can be an evil bastard at times, but rules is rules and all that). This meant filenames being correct; images being under 3MB, and the shooting date (based on EXIF data) was within the shooting challenge period. So, if your images didn’t comply with the rules, then they were not shortlisted.
The shortlisted images were then viewed with a ‘rule of thirds’ overlay to ensure the subject matter fell within the lines. Any that were not within the lines were discounted. Some additional cropping to some of the images would have made a world of difference, and the final outcome MAY have been very different.
The final selection was then judged on their subject matter, composition, colour, shooting technique/method and overall WOW factor.
So, this week’s winner is a slightly tipsy Ian Gordon and his stunning image of a manky old tractor tyre. Well done, Ian — you’ve won yourself a Sony WX100 camera (worth £209) and 32GB USB stick (worth £39) from the people at Sony Pictures UK, who are celebrating Total Recall hitting UK cinemas from August the 29th.
Ian submitted a number of different images, all of which were absolutely amazing and would make an excellent set of framed prints, but many of them didn’t meet the requirements and so were dismissed.
Here’s how Ian captured his image:
I realised a few days before I took it that the only way I’d get a shot of a sunset in my home town with the water reflecting would be to wade out at low tide and shoot North-West. It’d need to be a night that was going to yield a decent sunset, the tide was fully out and it was warm enough that I wouldn’t mind standing in 3 inches of sea water for an hour. I was pretty shocked and gutted in equal measure when, a couple of days later, all three conditions suddenly looked right and then to realise that I’d left my tripod at work. Not all was lost, I had an old one with a broken leg that would work as long as I didn’t need to adjust it too much.
So this was a challenging shoot. I was in 3 inches of water, about half a mile off shore looking for something to put in the foreground – I found a tractor tyre – I couldn’t put anything down and the leg of my tripod kept falling off. I’d also had 3 Leffe Blondes and that stuff is dynamite.
Tripod + remote control + ND (8) filter + ND graduated filter. Aperture totally shut as much as possible and a remote control operating the shutter which was open for around 23s.
There was enough water to reflect the sunset, but not enough to create any movement apart from the deeper section in the foreground.
This was on the hottest day of the year, man those colours!
I couldn’t decide between this and the other tractor tyre shot I sent in. I like the composition of this better, the tyre and horizon lining up with the thirds lines better and I like the water in the centre of the tractor tyre letting you know what it is.
Well done Ian; you’ve captured a cracker! Also, I must give honourable mentions to Nick Acott and Rory McMeekin for coming close runners-up.
Also, Adam Douglas, Jake Gibson, Jason Finesilver, Michael Toye and Luis Cruz for their images.
Click Here to view all the entries
I’ll have another shooting challenge for you next week, so get those cameras ready!
Martin Snelling is a Hampshire-based man about town who works in the videogame industry. A keen photographer, Martin shoots on film and digital; he blogs here, and tweets here.





















Shooting Challenge: The Rule of Thirds
Shooting Challenge #13 -- Results
Shooting Challenge #3 Results: Silhouettes
Congrats to the winner, bummer mine didn’t make the page.
Is there no gallery this time Martin?
They’re on the flickr – think Martin’s forgotten the link; http://www.flickr.com/photos/gizmodouk/
Thanks! At least there are more entries each time.
And congrats to you sir!
Cheers! Yeah – 81 photos in the set, I don’t envy them for having to pick a winner in that lot.
Apologies; will add the Flickr link to the post now. For the record, yours is great! We can’t squeeze them all in the post though, sadly…
No worries, I get that.
I would just like to win that Symbian phone some day
Wow! I’m so chuffed. Of all the images I shot for the challenge that was the first one (that merited processing). It was an amazing sunset and I might not have bothered if it wasn’t for the shooting contest. I felt a bit crazy out there with a broken tripod, and a bottle of beer in my shorts and sandals, but I guess that’s what these comps are all about.
Yeah, I suspect some of the other shots I sent didn’t line up proper – I really need to get gridlines on my crop tool – it was all guess work.
Anyway, some amazing pics – the Spaniel on the sand and the shot of the cheetah are breathtaking. Good work everyone – I’m off to flickr to have a look at them all…
Well done fella. As I said in the article, I was super-critical of the entries given the prize and many were rejected as they didn’t fall within the lines.
Adam’s dog on the beach is something spectacular and would have won if the shooting challenge was “Dog on the Beach”
Thanks, I’ve figured out the gridlines on the crop tool (it was the mysterious “show guides” radio button), so I’m unstoppable now ; )
Some cracking images here! Well done to the winner.
Personal fav is Adam Douglas.
Thank you for your kind words, however the spaniel in question “Benji” is not so still normally this was a one off I think
ditto, im not a dog person or owt but its just nice that one
Loving some fo the shots. Next shootinv challenge can there be a rule to keep the post processing to a minimum.
Comment noted.
Out of interest & more for discussion – what would you consider post processing to a minimum?
For me I think moderation would be to use only global edits and no brushes, but minimum would be brightness, contrast, exposure, saturation tweaks – ok, no brushes, no enhanced levels adjustments, no individual colour adjustments, no other effects like vignette and stuff.
Playing devils advocate – many shoot in RAW which stuff like individual colour could come under global edits in RAW workflow but would need layer masks and stacking in jpeg form.
Again enhanced level adjustments is either really simple or complicated depending on work flow.
Tell you what – just as an experiement what changes do you think was done to mine & workflow? (Boba Fett)
I’m just asking out of curisoisty, obv. its up to Martin to set the rule and thats fine by me.
*disclaimer* I love the photos above especially the dog one.
But to answer your question. Brightening the photo or darkening it are fine. As soon as you start involving masking, multiple layers, hdr then its not really the original photo.
Martin has been really good so far picking winners I don’t think have been tampered with too much but more and more of the photos in flickr are heavily edited. The 3 I entered this time were the original photos with a small amount of editing. And I think on one of them I added a very low agfa filter.
Don’t worry I’m the same, photos are fantastic. Theres always the chat about what consitute as a photo and I find it fascinating.
I think most if fair game unless you are inserting/taking away something that was not the orginal intent.
Good I was a bit worried there I’d stirred up a wasps nest.
I don’t know what it is. I over process weak photos sometimes to make them viewable but I just feel guilty putting a mega processed photo into something like this.
If Im being honest, I think its fair game so long as HDRs arent allowed.
Nah far from it – I find it very interesting where people draw the line.
For most of the challenges I will state what the post-processing guidelines are. However, this challenge was about adhering to the rule of thirds and so all levels of post-processing was acceptable.
I have in the past used examples of images that have been processed in Silver Efex Pro 2 – some may say this in itself is over-processing; but as my usual photographic style is B&W (often grainy) it isn’t a concern.
I think the level of post-processing allowed will differ depending on the shooting challenge. It may be a requirement in a later challenge that you have to submit the original and final images together.
I will always try to be clear on what the guidelines for each challenge are in the rules.
What do you think is too much processing?
Love Nik Software – got me out of a few issues in the past!
I’m from a digital era, I’ve always worked with Camera & Photoshop. I think as long as you are not inputing or taking anything away fromt the orginal photo. For example the flower shot if the Butterfly was added in post.
What I was wondering is how specific to the rules, as you know certain things you can do in RAW that are one/two clicks but would take multipl layers in jpeg. I’m all for making it so everyone has as fair game as possible
I did read an interesting article somewhere on jpeg vs RAW and the gist was, if you’re not intending to process heavily, jpeg is better – not because of the time you save, but because in the compression, the colours are often stronger and the natural contrast is better. Unprocessed RAW is often washed out. What I’m saying is that if I was shooting with an aim to presenting to you pretty much what came out the camera, I’d shoot jpeg.
In my shot above I shopped out a Tennents lager can (it is Scotland, after all) and boosted the colours a bit, and lightened the tyre a bit to make the details stand out.
Here’s the original side by side with the beer can in all its glory:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1104396/comparison.jpg
Nick, for the Boba Fett shot I’m guessing you adjusted the globals to get the sky under control and added a vignette, maybe brushed up the details on the Fett’s armour?
Yeah, the beer can is an issue that I’m really not sure about. Normally I’m against shopping anything out of the photo like lamposts, telegraph poles, litter, etc. I should’ve spotted that lager tin and removed it, but the way the light was shining, I really didn’t until I got into the lightroom. So, while Im a purist, the shoe was on the other foot when I saw that unprocessed image.
For me, too much is when the image no longer looks like it did at the time. I’m not a huge fan of HDR for that reason, I realise I’ve done a lot of long exposures of this competition and straight away am manipulating the scene to create something more appealing than the reality, but that’s different because it’s a photography technique, not a processing technique.
Thats kinda what I was getting at originally. It’s a photography competition not a processing competition.
I am much more impressed by peeps who can do stuff in camera. Using photography techniques. Timelapse, rear curtain, multi image stacking. if its in camera its cool with me.
Agree completely. For me photography is about honesty and capturing something real.
I usually increase contrast, vibrance and maybe a bit of noise reduction in Lightroom on most of my pictures, but never go beyond that.
I really hate HDR, even though the photo sharing sites seem to be chock-full of it these days.
The beauty of photography, like any form of media (music, art, literature) is that is can be different for everyone. For some it is about the honesty and keeping it real; for others it is about making a statement or creating an optical illusion – its just like the different art movements we’ve had over the years.
Image manipulation has always been there since the dawn of photography; back then a majority of it was done in the dark room.
I too hate the over-use of HDR; especially in portraits.
I actually did quite a bit of processing on this one as it was allowed for this week. I shot on my Sigma 30mm lens which I love but can be a little soft!
In RAW:
Increased Clarity for cloud def, increased blacks (for same) Added a little fill light, changed white balance (both temp & tint) flatten colour more.
Strong ‘S’ curve on contrast.
Increased sharpness.
Highlight priority vignette.
Increased Yello saturdation.
Corrected for lens distortion.
Then in Photoshop.
Play’d around with curves a little,
Duplicated layer, masked around Boba & increased vibrance & flattened image.
Duplicated again, masked around Boba & did a high-pass sharpen.
Resized & saved as jpg.
My main point being that most the work done in RAW workflow is incredibly simple & non-destructive, that part only took me around 3-5 mins whilst the photoshop side too much longer (around 45 mins with masking) and was much more final in application.
Now certain parts of each will fall under heavy editing but how do you inforce that side – as said certain things on jpg are incredibly easy to do on a RAW workflow….
Dammit… it was really terrible weather here and then the only nice day was on my birthday so didn’t take any shots. I really wanted to enter this one
Yet again, some amazing photos.
I was happier with my entries this time but will say that I was definitely beaten by better shots, so well done to all who entered.
I am looking forward to a more constrained rule set for the next competition though.
Next week’s competition will be more constrained
I completely forgot about this one! Agh. I hope I can enter the next competition…
I think a long exposure comp would be a good idea, only white balance tinkering allowed
determined to win won of these comps
I was going to suggest at one point – do love a bit of long exposure
I’ve made a note in my little black book it says “long exposures”
For those who have never met Martin I can confirm he is not speaking metaphorically, he really does have a little black book. These photo comps have really gotten good now, maybe it’s time for some companion articles, starting with basic kit, shooting styles and post processing options.
seconded, that sounds awesome.
re: long exposures, isn’t that a bit (for want of a better term) elitist? I, for one, wouldn’t know how to set up a long exposure picture on my phone and I’m not aware of an app that’d let me…
I will always try to make any shooting challenge as open to as many people as possible – I’m not looking to exclude anyone just because they shoot with a phone camera.
With regards to the long exposure challenge, I would look to ensure that suitable free apps were available prior to writing it and including those in the challenge.
If that were the case then I would love a long exposure challenge. :p
Oh oh and another idea for the future. Maybe consider doing a rear curtain flash challenge.
ITs easy to do and for those who are uncertain what it is itll let them learn a new feature on their camera.
Something like this? Excuse the quality I ripped it from my page on Facebook
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg513/scaled.php?server=513&filename=facebook976542669copy.jpg&res=landing
Great shots guys. I particularly love the Playmobil pirate
I ran out of time on this one but am determined to get my arse in gear for the next..
I had inspiration at 8:00pm on Monday night, but didn’t finish setting up until 12:00am Tuesday morning and fell asleep before I even captured it.
Congrats to Ian, it’s a stunning photograph. More prizes next week, Mark?
I’ve changed my mind now, can we have “Dog on Beach” comp please ha ha