People put terrible things on the internet. Very terrible things. And it’s someone’s job to make sure that regular people don’t run into them. But that is a terrifying job, and it understandably scars a lot of people who do it. Buzzfeed talked to one former employee who told the story.
The ex-employee, who is not named, explains that the job involves spending hours and hours and hours looking at horrible content, like beheadings, child pornography (up to 15,000 images a day), gore, and extreme fetishes. That would be tough for anyone. It was enough to deeply affect this particular employee:
Google got someone from a federal agency to talk to me, and that’s when it occurred to me that I needed therapy. She showed me photos of seemingly innocuous activities (kind of like a modified Rorschach test) and asked me for my first visceral reaction. I was like, “That’s fucked up!” It was just a father and a child.
Since the employees doing this job are contractors, they can only stay for a year. Otherwise, they have to be brought on full time, and Google did not seem to want that. So it let him or her go, as it apparently does for most in that job. Maybe that’s for the best, since more than a year—more than a day—in that job seems hugely unhealthy. But the lack of a support system does seem especially cold.
For the rest of the details, you should definitely read the full firsthand account over at Buzzfeed. [Buzzfeed]
Pedobear image credit: Jim Cooke at Gawker; original image from Richard Laschon/Shutterstock













Samsung Audit: No Child Labour, But So Many Other Problems
This Has to Be the Worst Steve Jobs Tribute Yet
Greek Police Accused of Terrible Photoshop Job to Hide Evidence of Brutality
I’d do this job if the wages were right. You’d save enough money to pay for a therapist afterwards too.
Google, hire this man!
yeh, its f**ked up to actually look at what goes on in life
best to just do what everyone else does. eat your burger, push all thoughts of animal cruelty out of your mind & carry on shopping
Fight the power, man…
Animal cruelty on the top of your list pretty sure watching a child being raped is considerably worse
I had a camel burger on the weekend.. It was tasty
Wait, burgers are made from animals? FIGHT THE POWAH!!!
If you were to do that job I think the only way to prevent yourself from becoming depressed is to constantly remind yourself of the millions of other peoples sanity you potentially just saved removing these things from the search results.
I’d do the job and like to think I wouldn’t need he psychiatric help but would need to know it was there if I did.
I also hope the tests for these jobs are strenuous and are repeated regularly.
Is it possible to apply for this position?
How much does it pay?
Can I work from home?
What benefits would be included in my prospective package?
You wish to actively seek out a job to view kiddy porn, and be paid for it while staying at home in your internet room of depravity? By the powers vested in me from a text vote on BBC News I pronounce you a paedophile! The benefits… Death! *loads crossbow*
Emotive and impulsive. Not qualities that I’d seek in my ideal paedophile-catcher.
If the job paid more than what I do now and allowed me to work from home and had some nice perks; I think I’d take it. I genuinely think I’m that desensitised that I could remove myself from the emotional attachment to what I was seeing and treat it purely as a job (indeed a job with an utterly positive contribution to society).
There might be something truly horrific that would shock even somebody like me, but I do believe the overall compensation package will account for this.
I’d suggest that anybody applying for a job that entails looking at child porn for some time needs therapy already.
Gary Glitter is unemployed right now, sounds like the perfect fit.
Sounds like he was just browsing 4chan’s /b/
I applied for a job about 8 years ago with the Police, and one of the interview questions was “How would you feel about having to look at child pornography etc” – apparently they have to sift through it more than we think.
The money wasnt that great (~£35k), but they did say there was compulsory meetings with a counselor every month, which was nice of them.
What’s the correct answer to that question though, if you answered yes that could be interpritted as you like it, if you say no it could be seen as you not having the stomach for it? So what answer do they actually want?