9 
The first reviews of the iPhone 5 are out and everyone’s in unison: the larger screen, the impossibly thin (and light!) body, and the increased speed all make for the best iPhone ever. But is it the best smartphone and is it for you?
There’s no denying that the iPhone 5 is a lovely thing, and the best iPhone to date. It could well be Apple’s best-selling unit ever.
But a lot has changed in a year, and the current crop of Android superphones – and the incoming Windows Phone 8 handsets – have closed the gap. For nearly every “new” feature announced at the Keynote, there was a Samsung, Android, Windows, Nokia, Sony or HTC fan saying “my phone already does that.”
First off, you’re going to be shocked at how light this phone is. It’s the lightest iPhone, even though it’s longer and has a bigger screen. After a few days with it, the iPhone 4S will feel as dense as lead.
Secondly, the screen size lengthening is subtle: but, like the Retina Display, you’re going to have a hard time going back once you’ve used it. The extra space adds a lot to document viewing areas above the keyboard, landscape-oriented video playback (larger size and less letterboxing), and home-page organizing (an extra row of icons/folders). Who knows what game developers will dream up, but odds are that extra space on the sides in landscape mode will be handily used by virtual buttons and controls.
The move to 4 inches feels right for the iPhone, though it looks like a dwarf side-by-side with the 4.8-inch display on the Samsung Galaxy S III, arguably the best of the Android breed. I was able to display more than four extra paragraphs reading the same newspaper article on the Samsung as opposed to the iPhone 5. On the other hand, the iPhone screen appears sharper and brighter, and the phone is easier to carry.
Consider the windshield wipers on a car, and how, because they swing circularly, they can’t reach the passenger-side top corner. Using the iPhone 5 is like that. There are two specific touch targets where this gives me trouble, both of which I invoke frequently. First, back buttons in the top left corner. I keep mis-tapping underneath them with my fully-outstretched thumb and then need to subtly re-grip the phone so that my thumb can reach. Second, tapping the status bar to scroll to the top of the current view. The top-left back-button issue is only a problem when holding the iPhone 5 one-handed in my right hand, but, I’m right-handed and so that’s the hand I tend to use it with.
Ditching the glass back and reducing the thickness of the glass panel on the front has affected the design of the metal band around the edge of the iPhone. It is now chamfered and while that looks pretty, we’ve already noticed that on the black model the edge has started to wear, revealing the shiny silver aluminium metal underneath the “slate” coloured coating and, indeed, we’ve witnessed it on two separate models, ruling out a fluke manufacturing error.
These small scuffs will catch the light and make the phone look visibly worn. We suspect that it won’t be as noticeable on the white model because the metal edging is silver, so that’s worth bearing in mind when you come to order your colour choice.
In fact, the iPhone 5 truly rivals a dedicated point & shoot in its camera abilities. Stills are crisp and bright, using a new spacial noise reduction system that can identify any outlier pixels – such as a rogue green dot in among an otherwise blue sky – and iron them out. There’s also a low-light mode that promises a roughly two f-stop improvement in brightness and sensitivity by scaling down the end resolution and combining the data from four adjacent pixel clusters into each final dot in the frame.
The camera is among the best ever put into a phone. Its lowlight shots blow away the same efforts from an iPhone 4S. Its shot-to-shot times have been improved by 40 percent. And you can take stills even while recording video (1080p hi-def, of course)…
There’s a new panorama mode for the camera, too, that comes in handy more often than you might expect. As you swing the phone around you, it stitches many shots together into a seamless, ultra-wide-angle, 28-megapixel photo. Unlike other apps and phones with panorama modes, this one is fully automated and offers a preview of the panorama that materializes as you’re taking it.
Starting the phone, loading apps, or taking photos – everything is faster on the iPhone 5. Benchmarking with the Geekbench app has shown that the iPhone 5 is not just faster than the iPhone 4S but it also outperforms Samsung’s Galaxy S3.
Steve Jobs once said that interfaces which spawned a lot of windows meant that “you get to be the janitor” – a post he didn’t relish. Android lets you be the janitor, air-conditioning chief and managing director; the iPhone lets you be the user. It’s a key difference in philosophy. You can’t do as much on the iPhone – but sometimes fewer choices mean faster decisions. Siri in particular is a revelation; expect to hear much more of its C#-listening-to-G#-acting pings around you.
As for the iPhone 5, it’s a lovely piece of equipment. Boring? Lacking wow? With its market value now crossing $700bn and iPhone 5 pre-orders through the roof, Apple might disagree.
Apple says its new A6 dual-core processor has twice the power of the previous A5. In benchmark tests using the PassMark app, that certainly appears to be true. The iPhone 5 does everything – from computations to 3D rendering to opening apps – faster than the 4S, in some cases at double the speed.
To test [the Lightning connector] we lined up an iPhone 4S next to an iPhone 5 and ran both through a number of syncs with large files. Pulling 5.5GB of data from iTunes to the iPhone 4S took five minutes and six seconds on average. Syncing those same files to the iPhone 5 took three minutes and 57 seconds on average. So, nearly 20 percent faster, but we’re not sure how much of this is due to the new connector and how much can be attributed to faster internals in the phone itself.
Using an iPhone 5 on the LTE network in Silicon Valley and Washington, D.C., I averaged almost 26 megabits per second for downloads and almost 13 megabits per second for uploads. Download speeds peaked at 42 megabits per second. These speeds are more than 10 times the typical speeds I got on an iPhone 4S running on the slower 3G network and are faster than most Americans’ home Internet services. While LTE affects only data, voice calls I made on the iPhone 5 were clear, better than in the past. I had no dropped calls.
The iPhone 5′s battery lasted between 9 and 12 hours every day, in mixed use. For most people, the phone would last the day without recharging.
If there is one problem I had with the iPhone, it would be with the apps that weren’t designed for the larger screen. We’re used to going to the bottom of the screen for the menu, but because the older apps are centred on the screen, the menus aren’t there. I tap a few times before I realise I have to move my thumb up a little bit.
It’s a minor quirk that will go away as soon as the developers up their apps.
Testing the maps these last few days, I’ve come away impressed. No, I don’t think they’re as good as Google Maps, but they’re not bad by any stretch of the imagination. I’ve looked up local venues and found them all. I’ve looked up places overseas and found them too. I’ve played with the 3D stuff, which is pretty, but probably not all that useful day-to-day. And, of course, I’ve used directions.
I used turn-by-turn fairly extensively on the highway one day and it worked well. It’s great to have it on the lock screen and even better that it works even as you’re in other apps (it will pop up alerts as you travel). This is a welcome addition.
A non-welcome subtraction is transit direction – as in, they no longer exist natively in the app. Instead, Apple is saying they will partner with other app makers on this, but none are live just yet so I couldn’t test it out. If you live in a city where public transportation is key, this sucks.
Moreover, the rear of the phone grew noticeably hot when the GPS system was in use for an extended period, though I didn’t notice any undue impact on the phone’s battery life or performance.
Apple says some heat buildup is to be expected given the demands of the GPS system, and that my experience with the app’s inaccuracy was unusual; it provided me with a second unit that seemed to do better. Still, users should be wary until they’re convinced the new app is as good as the one being booted out to make way for it.
But the slickest think about the new Maps is one of the most spectacular things that Apple, or anybody else, has ever put on a gadget: Flyover… Flyover melds 3D models with photos shot from airplanes to recreate urban worlds with unprecedented realism.
Not surprisingly, Flyover seems to be very, very data-intensive: It took a while for those gorgeous scenes to pop up into place when I viewed them. But it was worth it.
So, is the iPhone 5 worth the money? Absolutely. And has Apple done enough to reclaim the top smartphone spot with the iPhone 5? It has, but not quite in the imperious style of the past. Android has gained so much in the last 12 months that the iPhone went from being unbeaten in years to being beaten twice in the space of a few weeks, and its live widgets and open platform will continue to sway people towards the Samsung Galaxy S3 or HTC One X.
I’ve had an iPhone since the beginning and have always been super excited to upgrade. But for the first time ever, this model totally bores me. I’m waiting to see what the Lumia 920 has to offer before I make my next 24 month commitment..
Agreed
Same here.
Wow, somebody is actually complaining that the screen is too big now!
What app are they referencing in the Bloomberg quote? THis article has had me going wantit, dont want it, want it, dont want it etc etc etc! I’m still torn between upgrading my 4 to a 5 or getting the HTC One X on a 12 monther from Vodaphone and waiting till the 5S comes out next year…….
Now that it’s been out a while, I think it’d be a mistake to get the One X over the S3, unless it’s a lot cheaper. Battery life alone is enough of a reason to get the S3 (miles better)
it’sa all bout the 12 months with me, i dont want to be tied in for any longer and the One X is the best handset i can get on a 12.
No idea, but the reviewer looks like someone who shouldn’t be left near children so I wouldn’t trust anything he says…
Had me laughing. How did you get to this conclusion?
http://cdn.gotraffic.net/v/20120918_121851/images/authors/jaroslovsky.jpg
Looks like the sort of person who keeps a bag of licorice allsorts handy…
Hahaha
Make sure the maps app is better than Google’s. I think that is what he meant.
I have cautiously u-turned on my feelings about Apple ditching google maps. I had been angry about it and thought it was a transparent attempt to put the bottom line above the user experience (which it clearly still is), but having used iOS6 for almost a week now, I’m impressed.
Sure, there will be shortcomings that I haven’t noticed yet, but it’s an impressive entry into mapping (it had to be really.
I suppose Google will soon give iOS users the full experience as you get on Android, since their competitor now offers the same features (only not as good).
No reason to withhold it any more, and better from their corporate perspective to make people pass up on Apple’s offering.
Really? HTC One X? The only phones even worth thinking about apart from the iPhone5 are Galaxy S3 and Nokia Lumia 920.
But i cant get them on a 12 month contract.
You probably can.. in a couple of months. The S3 atleast.
Waiting a couple of months is going to negate the reason why i want a 12 month contract, her’es where i stand. I have an iPhone 4, a 17′ MBP an iPad 3rd Gen and will be getting an AppleTV box fairly soon, i’m firmly entrenched in Apple and have downloaded over 400 Apps in the 4 yrs i’ve had an iPhone. I’m not sure if the iPhone 5 is enough of a leap for me, it’s certainly noticeably better than the 4 but i’m still not sure it’s worth 2yrs of my life, so i’m thinking i can have an android for a year, if i dont like it i can foister it onto mrs Spatchmo and have my iPhone 4 Back but either way the likely hood of me getting the 5S is up in the 90′s so i want my new contract to run out in time for me to have the 5S within a reasonable amount of time of its release. I want to try android and i want to have a decent handset and the One X is still new enough for me to be satisfied. Of coarse i’d like the SIII as its the best, easily the best, but if i wait 3 months then that’ll mean no iPhone 5S for Spatchmo till 2014. I’ve set til the end of October as the deadline to make up my mind.
Your argument makes good sense, but it’s based on an assumption that the iPhone5S (or whatever it’s called) will be revolutionary and fresh. If the “iPhone5S” disappoints, you’ll be stuck with an android or a really old iPhone. I would suggest that you upgrade incrementally as and when phones are released instead of speculating. This will make things a lot smoother, as options for upgrades are available (even mid-contract). If you want to try something new, how about WP8? I own an iPhone4 as well, and I am seriously considering the Lumia 920. Great looking OS, Good features and really fresh design and colors. (+wireless charging will make me an early adopter). Although, since I am entrenched in Apple with MacBook etc as well, any move away from Apple will instantly pose integration and compatibility issues.
I’m still in 2 minds and might just go for the iPhone5, so I’m feeling pretty sure i’ll want the iPhone 5S next year! I could just stay on the iphone 4 for a year. I’m sure the leap from 4 to 5s will feel like a big Jump and i’m only really interested in dipping my toe into Android, i’d have to have a good play with a WP8 to even think about thinking about it!
Really? Why is the One X so much worse than the Galaxy that it isn’t even worth considering?
Look at these moron reviewers. The fact that they mainly compare it to the 4S rather than the S3 says a lot: they can’t because the iPhone can’t win. The only thing they bring up is the Geekbench mark, which as we saw on that other article is absolute bull.
The way most mainstream publications talk about new iPhones is a little bit sickening.
The telegraph has written a lot of shit recently about the iPhone. Here you can see them saying it “out performs the S3″. Sure, just go ahead and make shit up!
totally agree, I cant believe people think its an amazing phone compared to the 4S
Its and OK phone compared to the 4s, hardly warranting all the hype.
maybe its because the hipsters will need longer pockets in their skinny jeans, and the resulting sales of said jeans will boost the economy and get us out of recession
and as for descriptions especially beautiful, sexy etc.. i mean WTF I like gadgets and tech as much as most people, BUT SEXY? is hardly a word to describe any tech.
and however good or bad a phone looks, most people will have a case on it because not having means expensive repairs or god forbid an iphone has a mark on it, my phone gets chucked in my pocket with keys or in a backpack so i feel aesthetics are not as iportant as the “OMG the phones is so hot i want to mate with it” crowd suggest
I’ve always thought it’s really sad how Apple has geared the consumer towards such consumer fetishism as giving a shit what your phone looks like.
It’s incredibly sad that it’s now OK to judge a £600 tech purchase decision on how it makes you look. Words like sexy. I hate the idea of fashion and trends, and being a mug, which is in part why I’ve always rejected Apple.
I believe you should be laughed at and ridiculed for aspiring to own a “sexy” phone.
Can’t win how? On tech specs? At this level I could’t care less about performance figures.
Ditching the glass back and reducing the thickness of the glass panel on the front has affected the design of the metal band around the edge of the iPhone. It is now chamfered and while that looks pretty, we’ve already noticed that on the black model the edge has started to wear, revealing the shiny silver aluminium metal underneath the “slate” coloured coating and, indeed, we’ve witnessed it on two separate models, ruling out a fluke manufacturing error.
These small scuffs will catch the light and make the phone look visibly worn. We suspect that it won’t be as noticeable on the white model because the metal edging is silver, so that’s worth bearing in mind when you come to order your colour choice.
Im not liking the sound of this!!!. damn i wish i went white now hehe
What happened to that special anodised coating they use on the nanos?
I can feel a free case coming along
Scratches are still better than white though!
Would have been nice to have had each of their ratings included. Now i have to go to each article… man, I’m too lazy for that!
We already spent most of the day looking at a massive drawing. give yourself a break
And I was too lazy for that too!
Haven’t read them all yet, but in relation to low light potential and panorama; I’ve been using iOS 6 for a few days on the 4S, which has reasonable low light capability and panorama is USELESS in low light. It’s worse than bad. Maybe it’ll be tolerable on the iPhone 5, and there aren’t that many occasions where you’re shooting panoramas in low light, but just sayin’….
The stuff about the edges wearing is worrying since the white one sounds like it’s gonna look dumb with an aluminium back.
I too have had iOS6 since it was ‘available’ and i have a 4 so no panorama, I am disappoint!
The iPhone 4 doesn’t “support” panorama.
It’s for you own good. It’s not worth having panorama unless it’s done RIGHT. And Apple determines that the experience won’t be good enough on your iPhone 4, so you can’t have it.
Sorry.
Dammit, well, Apple do know best in these issues so i shall defer to their greater knowledge and brilliance in all things.
That’s annoying.
Dermandar is probably as good at the stitching, just not very high res.
Don’t worry about the wearing of the aluminium. They’re simply following the japanese aesthetic of wabi-sabi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_aesthetics#Wabi-sabi
What a sublime concept!
I think I’d rather apply it to a pair of jeans though!
I wondered about the black bezel and whether the coating was durable. It looks like it may be an issue Apple will have to deal with. The last thing I want is speckles of silver appearing after a few months. It’s a shame you can’t spec the silver bezel on a black phone.
I think the first two sentences in the quote from the Guardian sums up my feelings about the smartphone landscape pretty succinctly.
Disagree with that view of the Smartphone landscape. I also generally disagree with everything The Guardian says on tech (they suck at tech)!
I think it’s a myth that the iPhone is more intuitive to use than an Android phone. I’ve seen no real explanation for this statement that has been floating around for years, other than “Apple is better at UX design”.
OK, in 2007 or whatever, this was probably true. Everything else was a bit messier. It was Symbian or WinMo, both of which were a lot less intuitive. But it stopped being true in no later than 2009 when Android 2.0 hit the market. (I haven’t used Android pre 2.0 much so I don’t know how intuitive it was).
From my experience with using my brothers S3 I’d say with Android you spend more time on housekeeping and general faffing about. Some people like that though and consider it to be part of having complete control over their device. It’s horses for courses really, go with what you like.
I’d tend to disagree, although I know what you’re saying.
I witnessed a colleague of mine switching from iOS to a GS3 this week, and admittedly for the first hour or two he was setting up accounts, customising layouts, installing apps etc; but once that initial setup period is done, you don’t ever have to go into Settings again if you don’t want to. However you always have the choice to tinker, should you wish to; that’s why I prefer Android over iOS.
There is a built in automated task-killer in the S3, tell him any extra housekeeping he is doing is extraneous and is more likely to be slow the thing down than speed it up.
Or if by faffing about you meant rooting and such like, well, that is his choice.
Anybody who reads the Guardian knows not to bother with its tech articles, they are particularly shameless.
“but sometimes fewer choices mean faster decisions”
= for some reason made me think of China…
I thought of that comment like this; Rather than having 15 choices, 5 being good and 10 being not so good, you still take time evaluating each option. Wouldn’t be be better to have 5 good choices and a couple not so good? There has to come a point where having too many options to choose from becomes stifling to productivity. It’s all relative of course.
The problem lies when somebody else has the power to decide what is good for you, and you don’t even have the option of experiencing the alternative.
You absolutely do. Buy another device. Invest in another ecosystem. Life is full of choices and compromises just like that.
I hate the languid phrase, but you forget to note “the cult of Apple”, where people just assume what is told to them is what is best, and are prepared to pay above their market value for such.
It also doesn’t help when usually accurate media sources such as Giz actively lie about performance in order to feed off them.
“Benchmarking with the Geekbench app has shown that the iPhone 5 is not just faster than the iPhone 4S but it also outperforms Samsung’s Galaxy S3.”
AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHH
*headdesk*
Sounds legit…
The Telegraph have written a lot of shit lately.
They used words like “indisputably”, in the context of the iPhone being “indisputably” the best smartphone, and “unrivalled”.
The Telegraph, like the Guardian, suck at tech.
I think both broadsheets review tech from the perspective of someone who doesn’t live and breath tech specs and tech forums. Either way, it’s good to have a set of reviews aimed at a broader demography.
I don’t think the media does cover the broader demography though.
non-Apple tech is hugely in the majority in terms of what people actually want and buy, yet the tech media don’t reflect this at all.
Look at the Macbook. The tech media CONSTANTLY talk about this as laptop number one, top dog. But most people buy Windows laptops because that’s what they’re after.
I just think that’s a case of media types all using macs and non media types generally not using macs. Certainly the case with people I know. And that’s not to say PC’s aren’t good creative tools, they are. Unfair? Probably, it’s just how things have developed.
It’s all about the quality really. To be honest, PCs are the worst things for quality.
That’s reflected by the fact that every creative and even some engineering education providers on the planet use Macs. I’ve yet to come across a media or creative degree, post-grad qualification or short course which is taught using anything other than an Apple product. You could argue it’s because they think they an attract more students with shiny Apple products, but I genuinely believe they go with the most tried and tested and reliable system that works best for them and their students.
I really don’t understand the point you are making here?
I have only ever had PCs and windows laptops, and as long as you look after them, they are as good as anything else that has been looked after
I have never had one break on me, be it the case, the screen, the keyboard they have all been reliable so although a macbook may be nice n shiny and bling, it really does not improve the the way it works, and if anything, its over engineered.
if you drop it, it will still get damaged, if you stand on the screen it will still break, its no tougher, just maybe shinier and more of a status symbol
and not bashing just apple, expensive windows ultrabooks are in the same category
it boils down to vanity and the presumption of wealth
Kippers and curtains sums this up as far as I am concerned
Most people do buy PCs but those PCs are made by several different entities (the rest of the world). As opposed to a Mac made by a single entity, Apple. To have the nerve to take on the whole world, is quite admirable. I would like to reiterate the MacBook Air is infact the best ultrabook on the planet.
For you, maybe the Macbook Air is the best ultrabook on the planet.
For me, it’s not, because it’s running the wrong operating system. There are other good ultrabooks out there, they’re just not marketed or selling as well.
It’s not just marketing, it’s build quality. Apple’s MacBook Air was the first of it’s kind and it’s guts were sensational at the time. The other ultrabooks aren’t so good on quality. And it basically comes down to trust. I would trust a company that make cheap plastic alternatives for a low end market, to buy my high end gadgets.
But I totally agree with you on the OS point. Apple seriously needs to concentrate more on the OS, cause it’s a bit shite at the moment.
This is the kind of language that seems to get used around Apple products. It’s one of the things that bother me, like calling gadgets sexy.
“it’s guts were sensational at the time”.
Really? Sensational? No other manufacturer would be adorned with those words. But also the Macbook Air was pretty rubbish when it first came out. We’re talking 2008 here. Everyone was pretty impressed with how thin it was, but also talked about how poor the specs were (rubbish CPU and rubbish GPU)
It wasn’t until late 2010 that the Macbook Air become decent – with the inclusion of an SSD and general spec bumb.
Also, are you really personally admiring the “nerve” of a corporate entity?
Apple is not a person, it’s not being brave or valiant by “taking on the world”.
Apples ENTIRE selling point is being different, so it’s hardly a surprise that they “fly in the face of everyone else”.
If they competed directly, they’d have gone a long time ago.
To be fair, Apple does push other companies to do better and innovate. If these companies didn’t face imminent extinction at the blink of an eye, they would just sit on their arses all year and not innovate at all (and would probably just make money off of incremental upgrades).
And frankly, If you want to dominate, you should be the best at the game. Since Jobs left, I’ve seen all of Apple’s shine fade away. The 4S and the 5 were silly. But I agree, that if atleast the next iPhone they release isn’t ground breaking, their dominance will not be justified.
Accepting the truth is difficult for droids… Tut tut
What truth? Please, enlighten us.
Could somebody who actually gives a shit confirm that these things at least when quoted in Gizmodo articles are usually an unending stream of praise?
The sad thing is Darrell, they usually are an unending stream of praise.
Or in the case of the telegraph, it points out a number of issues but goes on to conclude the iPhone five is “indisputably” “unrivalled”. Right.
My point was, these aren’t. Many of them point out the deficiencies the iPhone has compared to Android/WP phones. Thus it is possible that the media (or some parts of it) are no longer heaping blind adulation on it simply because it’s an iPhone. I have no problem with people liking the iPhone, I honestly, seriously never have, but I hate the blind acceptance of marketing bullshit I see on articles about it and other Apple products.
I would rather go with the telegraphs opinion rather than the tabloids, however when everyone is speaking well about it then how can it not be good…
It is good. It’s just not “indisputably” “unrivalled”.
If they priced it at £200 I think you could say fairly easily that it’s “the best” and nobody could argue, because the value for money would negate any other perceived benefits of any other option.
tl;dr never talk in absolutes.
I do think the iPhone is a great smartphone, with few rivals (except when you put the price on the equation).
But about “everyone is speaking well” it doesn’t mean much to me, as virtually every media channel in the world also believes Osama was captured, killed and thrown in the ocean…
Unending stream of piss is more like it.
I couldn’t give less of a shit if I stopped eating fibre for a month.
Maybe the phone’s actually decent.It doesn’t sound like it’s a revolution, but it does sound like a good quality standard phone. One thing is for sure though, the gap between the iPhone and all other phones is now closed. I am certain they will experience a fall in market share, after a month or two.
Maybe the only way to reduce the number of iPhone stories is not to comment on them…? Articles that drive people to keep coming back to read the comments (good or bad) generates footfall and therefore advertising revenue. If the audience don’t respond, readers don’t have any reasons to come back multiple times to load the page and read the updates. If we all stay quite (or the first person just comments ‘meh’) on every iPhone 5 piece the quantity should reduce.
Your suggestion is reasonable and logical but has nothing to do with what I was talking about.
You are right, what I said has very little to do with your comment!! I have read so many comments on the site about “too much iPhone {this}”, “too much Apple {that}” that I have actually become blind to it. I read your comment but my brain took it as something completely different. Maybe that shows that there is too much iPhone stuff on here and I expected it to be the same old stuff.
Anyway what am I doing? Pointlessly commenting on an iPhone article
Well thank you for considering my posts to be “the same old stuff”
I think Kat was saying that the repeat visitors (i.e. the people commenting) only accounts for a very small % of the page views and therefore ad revenues.. Although I may be making this up?
Can someone answer the “and is it for you?” part?
This entire article felt redundant because it wasn’t answered. Not mentioning the countless other shitty quotations of things that are common sense or a given. A phone surrounded by aluminium and glass gets hot when in use?
Can someone direct me to somewhere that actually properly reviews Apple products? And doesn’t run over the features list and ignore everything wrong, calling it a review. If not someone make this site with me, I need a way to be sarcastically irritated.
I haven’t seen anything like that for a few years I’m afraid. Genuine reviews from people who actually use these things seem to be very rare; most of them are written by ‘professional’ tech journalists who seem to have a love affair with Apple or Android and wear blinkers accordingly.
I don’t think there can be anything new said about the bad aspects of it. Well, not yet atleast. It’s just as shit as the iPhone 4S was. So that said, what else is left to say that doesn’t run the risk of repetition and tedium.
The build quality is good and it’s got a good processor and a bigger screen.Camera is slightly better. The question “is it for you?” can only be answered if they knew you and your situation.
It sounds like what you are looking for is an opinion piece. Reviews all generally tend to run over what the features are and what is on offer, pointing out either issues, or exceptional areas of an item in critical detail.
Whether it’s for you or not is based on your own situation, rather a decent review will not have heavy bias, and not draw too many like-for-like comparisons, but leave you with a great knowledge of the device itself.
Kat, GizUK editor does really good reviews but we haven’t seen one from her since the S3. Looking forward to more in the future!
Read it and weep droid rage ppl, the new king of Smart Phones has arrived.
Droid fans are truely devastated, if only they had free will to buy whatever device they liked ):
Cool !