If you thought ‘having a case of the Mondays’ was bad, you should try dragging yourself out of bed at 4am to make it to work and into uniform for 6am after four days off. Our shift patterns have always been a bit nutty, but the pattern we are on at the moment is actually pretty decent — in theory, we’re six days on, four days off. In practice, we’re often six days on, one day on secondment or similar, and three days off. The upside is that we do, indeed, occasionally get four delicious days off on the trot.
“529, you’re on a section 18 today, full details available from the Borough Intelligence Unit”, I heard through my Tuesday morning haze after four delicious days off work.
“Huh?” I eloquently replied, to much laughter from my team mates.
“Matt! Section 18! Wake up!” the sergeant barked with a grin. I hang my head in mock shame, as the rest of the team settle back into their chairs for the rest of the briefing. Sometimes, a bit of light ribbing is all it takes to bring the whole team out of their first-shift-of-the-set funk; this was one of those times, and somehow, I could feel the whole team wake up around me.
The ‘Section 18′ the skipper had assigned me to refers to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984. A section 18 search is a constable’s power to ‘enter and search without a search warrant’. A s18 would most usually be done after someone has been arrested, and it appears that they may be hiding items or goods related to their arrest at their home. Basically, if someone is arrested for selling drugs, we usually end up searching their residence under s18, under the (usually accurate) assumption that if they have drugs for sale on them, they may also have additional drugs at home.
So, my assignment today would be to root through someone’s stuff to find something untoward.
Searching another person’s home is a really, really weird experience the first time you do it. And, come to think of it, it never really becomes un-weird (although, obviously, you do get used to it). For most drug searches, it’s a pretty easy job; people aren’t particularly good at hiding their drugs stash. For one thing, street-level dealers aren’t known for their intellect and insight (the higher-ups might be slightly more well-equipped in the intelligence quotient score card stakes, but then, they are unlikely to keep their own wares in their houses), but also, when it comes to drugs and money that’s actually in circulation, it needs to be easily accessible, which means that the hiding places tend to be relatively obvious.
Of course, we also have another arrow in our proverbial quivers: we have a large squad of furry canines that have no greater joy in life than sniffing out drugs. The first time you meet a drug dog, you might be surprised, too: When most people think ‘police dog’, they think the big, bitey kind of dog — German shepherds, for example, are a perennial favourite. However, drug dogs don’t actually have to do any of the running, biting, and scaring people, so the Met uses other clever dogs instead — cocker spaniels seem to be a favourite at the moment, which always seemed pretty hilarious to me — they aren’t the scariest of dogs, exactly. But then, they don’t need to be.
A well-trained drug dog will simply happily tromp around the house, and when they find drugs, they’ll mark the spot by…sitting down next to the drawer, cupboard, or floor board. No barking, no whining; they just sit down, look at their handler in expectation of pets and perhaps a cuddle. It’s absolutely astonishing to see them in action — and if we know we’re looking for drugs, it makes our job very easy indeed.
Today’s search was in a house I can only describe as positively filthy. Disgustingly squalid. It was the kind of place where I felt it necessary to start putting my search gloves on before we even knocked on the door. Of course nobody answered.
“Did we get his keys?” I asked Jeremy, who was standing right behind me.
“Nope”, Jeremy said. “He chucked them away as he was arrested apparently.”
“Seriously?”
“Yes. This was why the inspector decided we had better take a closer look at his house.”
“What a daft move”, I said, looking at the door in front of me. I knocked again.
“I don’t think anyone is in”, Jeremy said.
“No kidding.”
“So, shall we open the door?”
“Have you got a Big Red Key?” I asked, referring to the battering ram we keep in the arrest vans.
“Nah, but we can’t let that stop us,” Jeremy grinned, producing his baton. He gave the glass pane next to the door a sharp rap, and my shoes were suddenly covered in glass.
Jeremy stuck his head though the broken window pane and took a look at the lock inside. It was just a simple lock with a lever on the inside, so he stuck his arm in, turned the lock, and we were inside.
Jeremy pushed a door open and went inside. A fraction of a second later I heard a shout, and Jeremy came flying backwards out of the door he had just pushed open, stumbling around with blood pouring out of his arm.
“Fucking fucks!” he exclaimed, clutching his arm.
I dragged him out of the house so I could take a better look in the daylight. He had a large flap of skin — several inches worth — hanging loosely from the back of his left arm.
I heard the dog unit get on the radio to get an ambulance to us, and one of the other officers ran over.
“I’m an Army paramedic,” he shouted. I looked up, and I can’t say I recognised him — I later learned he was part of the drugs squad; they were just along to have a look at the place. The paramedic pushed me aside, reached into the bag he had on his shoulder and produced a bandage of some sort. He flipped the flap of loose skin back onto Jeremy’s arm with a sickening, juicy ‘thwap’ sound, before quickly wrapping the wound in bandages. I was standing back, still not completely sure what, exactly, had just happened.
The K9 guys came back out of the house a few moments later — as soon as they had called an ambulance, they ran inside to see whether they could arrest Jeremy’s assailant.
“Booby trap”, one of them said. “They had rigged ropes connected to the door, with a kitchen knife tied to two 2-litre plastic bottles filled with water for extra weight.”
“What the fuck?” I said. We are regularly briefed about the possibility of booby traps, but I’ve got to say that I’ve never actually experienced one in real life, and I always just sort of assumed they were Metropolitan Police propaganda to keep us on our toes.
“We do see them quite often, actually,” the Army Paramedic said grimly. “But I’ve never seen one that actually worked before.”
Jeremy slowly came out of his state of utter shock.
“Mother… Fucker…” he said. “It hurts so much!”
“Ambulance is on the way, buddy,” I said, and wondered if perhaps I should throw him into the police car and rush him to hospital myself. I looked over at the medic, but he didn’t seem to think there was much of a rush, so we decided to just wait around until LAS (London Ambulance Service) showed up.
“I just saw a huge fuck-off knife coming for me,” Jeremy said, “so I threw my arms up. If the damn thing had just hit my metvest, I’d probably have been all right!”
“Or not,” I said. “You never know, man. Much more importantly is that you’re all right now — you’re not going to die, and soon you get lots of busty nurses taking care of you. They love a man in uniform.”
“Dude, that’s gross,” he laughed, before wincing in pain. “The only reason the nurses in that hospital are busty, is that they are huge all ’round.”
“Whatever, man,” I said. “Take it where you can get it, I say,” and nudged Jeremy in the ribs.
“Why the booby-traps?” Jeremy asked, directing his question at the medic.
“No idea. I guess they might be targeted at rival gangs, perhaps” he mused. “Or aimed at us perhaps. No idea. We’ll leave it to the SOCO guys to find out who actually set that trap; I don’t think we’ll be going inside of there until we’ve had the house cleared, just in case there are additional traps.”
Jeremy grunted, just as I could hear the ambulance sirens turn the corner at the top of the road.
As the ambulance crew started doing their thing, I went into the house to have a look at the booby-trap. It was a pretty simple installation, but what I realised was particularly grisly, was that the knife was exactly at chest height on me. Which means that on an averagely tall person, the knife would be throat or face height…
Jeremy was going to be all right, I remember thinking, but I could feel a cold shiver running down my spine. Jeremy is about four inches shorter than me, and it doesn’t bear thinking about what might have happened if he hadn’t parried the knife with his arm
***
Matt Delito is a pseudonym for a policeman working for the Metropolitan Police. All Notes from the Frontline are not entirely “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,” due to the sensitive nature of the business, but are all based on actual events. These days, he’s on Facebook and Twitter as well.
Matt has a book based on his Notes from the Front Line column out now – you can get it from Amazon, in paperback or on Kindle.
If you missed his previous columns on Giz UK, check them out over here.
Image credit: Police image from Shutterstock.
.













Notes From the Frontline: The Password
Notes From the Frontline: Knocking
Nasty! He wasn’t expecting to return home then, or at least he knew how to avoid/disable it.
Best wishes to Jeremy.
Hear hear. That’s just f’ing grim when you’ve got things like that to contend with.
“we have a large squad of furry canines that have no greater joy in life than sniffing out dogs.”
Must be very useful for the animal version of hide and seek at Battersea dogs home
Is a typo innit
Fixed, thank you hawkeye!
No trouble good sir, lovely to have you back with us!
Welcome back Mr.Delito! *Goes back to the top to start reading*
Grazie Mille!
Scary stuff – is there a standard procedure for if you suspect a house is booby trapped? Are there units trained for that sort of thing?
Yup, we’ve got people who are specialists at this sort of thing – I think the drugs and rapid-entry guys are further trained in it, too.
Another great article. Although it started off so nice with cocker spaniels then (to quote a certain Mr Burgundy) “escalated quickly”. Keep up the good work!
That is quite nasty. Is this a crime though? and what would it fall under considering that it is someones private home?
Yup, it’d be assault. Potentially attempted murder.
How is it assault? You entered his home without permission or asking him if it was dangerous?
How do those criteria somehow nullify the assault?
as far as i can remember is you set a trap or booby trap and it injurs a person whether they enter lawfully or not, then it is a criminal offence
for razor wire you have to have warning signs up. and has to be over a certain height without the sign it is illegal.
lets say for example if i put a piece of wood with nails sticking up through it at the bottom of my garden so if any burgler or tresspaser jumped over they would suffer, then i would be commitin an offence, however if i had a stack of wood there and one piece had a nail in it and it fell over, and a tresspaser jumped over and landed on it, i don believe this is a criminal offence (but probably negligent and knowing this country they could probably sue you).
the law is an ass,
and as much as i would like to booby trap my house for thieves and make them suffer and hurt because they are lowlife scum. the other side is that its possible to hurt innocent people.
what if you had a heart attack and the police or ambulance have to break in to save you, or what about a fire.
as for entering his home without permission, technically yes, but legally no, they had every right to, as would a fireman to put out a fire, or an ambulance medic saving someones life .
its just how it is, and rightly so (unless the persons house is the one being searched then obvioulsy they are going to be pissed, because its more evidence against them)
Grim.
On your earlier point about shift patterns a friend of mine works for Surrey Police and we’re amazed at the apparent stupidity of the shift patters she has to work.
Wouldn’t it make more sense if for a month (or 3) you did earlies, then a few days off followed by a month (or 3) of lates, etc, etc…rather than 6 days, break, change shift, etc…..
I’d go crazy after more than a couple of weeks of earlies, particularly if you’re trying to be social in any way, shape or form. I think a week of earlies, three days off, a week of evening, three days off and then a week of nights, week off is definitely the way forwards!
I know my friend finds it a nightmare constantly chopping and changing and my viewpoint was that at least doing it for longer would give some semblance of normality; after all, people work nightshifts for years in some jobs (factories, hospitals, etc..)
I have no idea how they manage that!
And yeah, stability and being able to plan around it is definitely a bonus!
I love being awake a night. It’s the day I cant stand. -_-
What, no obligatory sex toy found at a Section 18 search?
Can’t say I’ve seen or heard of a Section 18 that didn’t involve wiping your feet – on the way out.
Regards to “Jeremy” – always thought that was an Met myth as well.
Quite a grizzly one this week, hope he pulled through quickly, at least our favourite columnist wasn’t hurt. Would be hard to type with one arm out of action.
Not long enough! More! More!
(i.e. yet another enthralling read)
Welcome back sir! Feel your pain on the shift patterns – I’ve been in the office for 6am for 12 of the past 14 mornings.
FUN.
It always puzzles me how someone can set up booby traps with the intention of hurting others. I remember reading about a pair who had dug big holes in a park and filled them with wooden spikes and then covered them with a net and leaves.
I hope the dude who set up the knife got caught and put away.
I know it’s not entirely relevant to this case, but I’m suprised you didn’t go in to details of what a S32 search is as well, being as it is closely related to S18 searches.
For those wondering a S32 search is a search you carry out of the place you arrested someone. So say you arrested someone at their home for burglary, you can then search the home under S32 for the stolen goods. Or if you arrest someone at a friends house or shop, you can search that friends house or the shop.
Just a bit of trivia
I’ve just surprised that the arresting officer(s) didn’t decide to do a Sec 18(5) at the time of arrest.
Yeah that is a bit of an odd one.
Little tale:
Had a lovely Burglary suspect arrest enquiry the other week and we did a S32 once we nabbed him only to find a dozen little wraps of the big “C” in a DVD case! – I do love the S32 sometimes
It’s nice when little things like that pop up. S18s, 32s are some of the things I miss about not being on borough anymore.
Are you still working MET? got yourself a centralised CO have you?
hey Matt, great story! I was wondering if you had a spare moment or two, you could check these video’s out and see what you make of them, is he right in any way? Obviously he is being a massive ******* about it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmLqr2tr7jA
1) The guy in the car is an utter twat.
2) It was my understanding that under s136 and s185 of the RTA 1988 that the courts can more or less deem anything mechanically propelled (and intended for transportation) to be a motor vehicle, provided the reasonable man test is applied. So if the average bloke on the street would consider the car to be a motor vehicle, in the eyes of the law, the jury are entitled to find it as such for the purposes of the case in question.
Basically, not a leg to stand on. It smacks of a guy who read a Wikipedia entry on an act and decided that he could find a loophole which dozens of Govt lawyers and police officers couldn’t.
the guy is a complete dick, and deserves to be dragged out the car and beaten,
the copper is being polite,
i would tazer him in his face
people like this make their own problems
For someone to have a handle of “bikerlifestyle” to have a pop at someone following their own path is ironic but, let’s face it, 99% of bikers are just like most other uniform wearing subculture adherents/aficionados, the vast majority of whom are social inadequates who just happen to ride a bike/have tats/dye their hair/insert marker of individuality. SOME subculturists ride a bike because they like bikes, the vast majority do so because they think it confers upon them some sort of authority. Maz Harris called it BLJ Syndrome. Most of us think the L is superfluous.
Signed The 1%
Citation required
Following their own path is fine is all well and good and but this guy is not following a path he is being an obnoxious bar room lawyer who wants to give it to the man,
Which i don’t have a problem with, i am all for it.
His argument has no merit, his overall argument is that he does not agree with the system and laws with which this country runs on
Which again is fine.
But either you believe in your argument or you don’t, this person is either working or claiming benefits in which case he is paying taxes, he lives somewhere, he is paying rent, electric gas, he has a laptop and a phone which means he is paying for phone and broadband and probably has a bank account too. Making him part of the ‘commercial’ system of which he states he does not recognise
So this guy hates the system and wishes to remove himself from it and the laws on which it runs. Which again is fine
but the basis of his argument is the right to travel
which he is claiming is his legal right, however he has also stated he does not accept the legal system in this country.
So he wants to completely remove himself from the legal system which means he cannot rely on his legal defense of right to travel ergo making his point moot and hypocritical, as he is part of the system he fails to recognise.
OK lets pretend his argument has merit, then the logical step would be to go to court, prove his point, in which case he would be a hero to us all.
the only way to beat the system is to play the system.
Now to your opinions of bikers, I will happily agree with your statement, but then the same applies to everybody that follows well anything really so really not sure of the point you are trying to make,
Myself i rode custom bikes because i like them, I now ride a trike as i am in a wheelchair from as a result of doing what i love, i now photograph them.
but what this boils down to is that you have taken offence or distast to my previous comment.
..
“the guy is a complete dick, and deserves to be dragged out the car and beaten”
Ok i used a bit of artistic license there, well dont we all.
and yes the guy is a complete dick for the reason mentioned above AND the fact that to get his car back he needs a license, insurance and mot so rather than sticking it to the man, his actions have actually turned the tables on him and the man stuck it to him real good.
…
“the copper is being polite”
well yes he was, and very patient, i am not sure i could have put up with that crap if i was a cop.
…
“i would tazer him in his face”
maybe this is what you find offensive, the guy would not shut the hell up regarding his as shown above, hypocritical nonsense (to put it politely) and to be honest a taser to the face was my first idea before the 1st video finished (by the third i would happily have tased him 3 times) and again artistic license is to be infered (well this is the internet do you expect seriousness all the time)
….
“People like this make their own problems”
no idea what offense this could cause, but i will explain it anyway, what did this man achieve?
support for his cause? no did you read the comments on youtube?
he managed to prove he was right? well the video was upload 3rd feb, so he would have been through the courts by now, and i haven’t heard any headlines about people not needing a license.
He managed to keep out of the system he hates? again no, as he would have had to get insurance tax, and mot at the least, as well as pay his court fines so if anything he has put himself further into the system he hates and disowns.
he has achieved nothing, nadda ziltch nowt.
again i am all for sticking it to the man. but this man was peddantic, arrogant, self righteous and a complete waste of his and others time and the whole thing was probably so he could get famous on youtube.
however if the comments above were meant to be derogatory then am afraid i really couldn’t care less its all just words, and i don’t argue or pick fights on the internet, it as pointless as that blokes argument there are more important things in life.
However if you wish to have a reasoned discussion on the merits of this video or the pros and cons of societies cultures and subcultures i am happy to oblige
I watched that video and was quite surprised (based on the usual YouTube mentality) that the majority of viewers also thought he was a plank.
I’m guessing that the video was stopped after 22 mins when his car was seized for no insurance and he had to walk home. He was probably shown as wanted somewhere for unpaid fines, so perhaps he didn’t walk home.
People (not the likes that comment on here I hasten to add) often comment on why we’re not out catching murderers and rapists. Well, the ‘star’ of this clip helps to explain it a bit
There are 3 parts to the video, all 20 mins long he refused to give his name as anything but Dave as he did not have a surname because he didn’t recognise the system which gave him his name, and even though he had a birth certificate that document was just hearsay as he wasn’t there or was too young to remember to confirm the details.
They arrested him because he refused to acknowledge the legal system or give his name so they had to put him before a magistrate, seize his car, and told him to get his car back it had to have insurance mot and tax and someone with a valid license to collect it
Have you seen the rest of his youtube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/dmurphy25 it pretty much confirms he is a spanner.
According to his handle he is Dave Murphy and he is 25, If he is 25 then he has a hard life as he looks a little rough for 25.
25 wow he has had a hard life, maybe it’s all that living outside of the system off the grid that has aged him.:)
I will go and watch more when I have the chance (I still have a taser at the ready lol)
You might enjoy a chuckle reading this thread on pistonheads and the linked article
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=10&t=1156681
3 videos 20 mins each? Wow. Very patient officers!! I couldn’t watch more than 10 mins as I was getting frustrated at this guys arrogance and I couldn’t remember my YouTube login details to comment, lol
I’ve not seen the video as I’m a) at work with no sound and b) I’ll end up punching the screen (slight HR issue there).
But from what I’ve read on Pistonheads, I’ve come across these “Freemen” before. They say that they “opt out” of being governed and the laws, jibbering about Magna Carta and right to rebel, bla bla bla… (aka right to be a complete dick)
Frankly as far as I’m concerned, if these people opt out of our laws, then they can also opt out of our Human Rights laws and right to legal processes (which they so frequently hide behind!)
Great read Matt, and welcome back!