“Perhaps a Star Trek experience within our lifetime is not such a remote possibility.” Those were the words of Dr. Harold “Sonny” White, the Advanced Propulsion Theme Lead for the NASA Engineering Directorate. Dr. White and his colleagues don’t just believe a real life warp drive is theoretically possible; they’ve already started the work to create one.
Yes. A real warp drive, Scotty.
When it comes to space exploration, we are still cavemen. We got to the Moon and sent some badass robot to Mars. We also have those automatic doors that swoosh wide open when you get near them, but that’s about it. It’s cool, but we are far from being the space civilisation we’ll need to become to survive for millennia.
With our current propulsion technologies, interstellar flight is impossible. Even with experimental technology, like ion thrusters or a spaceship’s aft pooping freaking nuclear explosions, it would require staggering amounts of fuel and mass to get to any nearby star. And worse: it will require decades — centuries, even — to get there. The trip will be meaningless for those left behind. Only the ones going forward in search for a new star system would enjoy the result of the colossal effort. It’s just not practical.
So we need an alternative. One that would allow us to travel extremely fast without breaking the laws of physics. Or as Dr. White puts it: “we want to go, really fast, while observing the 11th commandment: Thou shall not exceed the speed of light.”
The answer lies precisely in those laws of physics. Dr. White and other physicists have found loopholes in some mathematical equations — loopholes that indicate that warping the space-time fabric is indeed possible.
Working at NASA Eagleworks — a skunkworks operation deep at NASA’s Johnson Space Center — Dr. White’s team is trying to find proof of those loopholes. They have “initiated an interferometer test bed that will try to generate and detect a microscopic instance of a little warp bubble” using an instrument called the White-Juday Warp Field Interferometer.
It may sound like a small thing now, but the implications of the research huge. In his own words:
Although this is just a tiny instance of the phenomena, it will be existence proof for the idea of perturbing space time-a “Chicago pile” moment, as it were. Recall that December of 1942 saw the first demonstration of a controlled nuclear reaction that generated a whopping half watt. This existence proof was followed by the activation of a ~ four megawatt reactor in November of 1943. Existence proof for the practical application of a scientific idea can be a tipping point for technology development.
By creating one of these warp bubbles, the spaceship’s engine will compress the space ahead and expand the space behind, moving it to another place without actually moving, and carrying none of the adverse effects of other travel methods. According to Dr. White, “by harnessing the physics of cosmic inflation, future spaceships crafted to satisfy the laws of these mathematical equations may actually be able to get somewhere unthinkably fast — and without adverse effects.”
He says that, if everything is confirmed in these practical experiments, we would be able to create an engine that will get us to Alpha Centauri “in two weeks as measured by clocks here on Earth.” The time will be the same in the spaceship and on Earth, he claims, and there will not be “tidal forces inside the bubble, no undue issues, and the proper acceleration is zero. When you turn the field on, everybody doesn’t go slamming against the bulkhead, which would be a very short and sad trip.”
There is only one problem with all this: where does the energy come from? While we knew that warp drives were theoretically possible, physicists have always argued that they would require a ball of exotic matter the size of Jupiter to power it. Clearly, that is not practical. But thankfully, Dr. White has found a solution that changes the game completely.
The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimise the warp bubble thickness and “oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time,” they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to “send a 10-metre bubble at an effective velocity of 10c.”
Ten c! That’s ten times the speed of light, people (remember, the ship itself would not go faster than the speed of light. But effectively it will seem like it does).
That means that we would be able to visit Gliese 581g — a planet similar to Earth 20 light years away from our planet — in two years. Two years is nothing. It took Magellan three years to circumnavigate around our home planet — from August 1519 to September 1522. A four year roundtrip to see a planet like Earth is completely doable. And there are even closer destinations where we can send robots or astronauts.
The important thing is that there is now a door open to a different kind of exploration. That, like Dr. White says, “perhaps a Star Trek experience within our lifetime is not such a remote possibility.” We may be witnessing the very beginning of a new age of space exploration, one that would finally take us from our pale blue dot back to where we belong.
I don’t know about you, but I’m more excited than when Captain Kirk got his first unobtonanium underpants.













Somebody Built the Star Trek Academy or a Jedi School or Something
Almost There -- 10 Star Trek Technologies Within Our Grasp
The New Star Trek Is Beaming In Some Serious Atmos(phere)
Finding a reactor that can control the matter-antimatter reaction would be a good place to start. Globally we produce a billionth of a gram or maybe more.
Can Giz PLEASE get over this stupid animated gif phase. Its distracting.
MORE GIFS!!!
Gifs are coooool.
I don’t know if anyone follows or understands this stuff in a technical sense, but to put it in a non-technical sense, this article is a load of horse shlt….
The only way Dr White’s theories ‘might’ work is if the volume of the warp bubble being moved is absolutely microscopic. He imagines a technology in which we can compress the mass of the spaceship and the people and cargo it contains down to an incredible density (thus microscopic volume) and then reinflate them safely on the other side.
If you believe this could ever happen then you should be writing blogs about the first ‘innerspace’ armies that we’ll be be shrinking down and hiring to zoom around the human body fighting evil anti-bodies and keeping us healthy. Because we’d be there thousands of years before we could shrink things 1bln time smaller than that to make White’s theories ‘maybe’ work.
What a load of comic-con, stoned on the dirty dorm room couch crap….
Plus if we could shrink ourselves down 1bln times we wouldn’t NEED to explore space. The entire current population of the earth could live on the surface of a basketball and off of the energy of a single BigMac Value meal for the next billion years.
(I realize we’d be supermassive particles and crush the basketball, but let’s not let reality get in the way of a good rant!)
I think the theory is to compress and expand the space around the “craft” rather than the craft itself
Joss you are right. However the key to the energy problem is how much space you need to compress in front of you and stretch behind you. The smaller your volume the less space you are going to need to displace and pull along (this is not exactly right but does illustrate the energy problem).
Let’s say a sheet of paper is a 3d plane of space you want to travel across and you are starting from one edge and travelling to the opposite edge. In the math to this problem your warp engine would need to reach out and grab the opposite edge of the paper and pull it towards you. You’d need a strip exactly as wide as your ship to make a path. So the width of the strip you’d rip out of the paper represents the energy you’d need “compress” the space in front of you. You’d need an equal amount of energy to stretch the space behind you to the point across the ‘universe’ to which you are travelling. It should be easy to see that the wider (and taller) your ship is the bigger the path, and thus the more energy, you’ll need to pull/push to your desired destination. Another good analogy is using a drill to put a hole in a wooden ball. Smaller drill bit removes less wood, bigger hole requires moving more wood.
So you’re saying lets not let reality get in the way of a good rant thats ranting against the reality of a claim that the rant is stating that reality isn’t really reality but furthermore the reality of the reality, in reality, could be real if the reality of the reality was altered?
Sure, why not!
realityception!
Yep, you read it wrong, space is expanded and contracted, not the ship.
Nope – you misunderstand the math. Space is compressed and stretched. However the key to the energy problem is making the amount of space you need to compress/stretch as small as possible.
His theories only work if you are almost infinitely small. Even if you are the size of a pebble the amounts of energy needed to get you there are VAST…
The only way to solve his problem and the only way he (or anyone else) has ever been able to theorize getting around the problem is making the object being moved incredible dense – thus lowering the amount of space needed to be pulled/pushed…
“The Eagleworks team has discovered that the energy requirements are much lower than previously thought. If they optimise the warp bubble thickness and “oscillate its intensity to reduce the stiffness of space time,” they would be able to reduce the amount of fuel to manageable amount: instead of a Jupiter-sized ball of exotic matter, you will only need 500 kilograms to “send a 10-metre bubble at an effective velocity of 10c.””
I understand the theory (somewhat) and what this appears to be proposing is stutterwarp rather than full warp, which reduces the power issue greatly.
The volume of your bubble is still the massive driving force. To send a 10m bubble at 10c for how long exactly? I think you’ll find that number is so close to zero that it’s zero…
At c you could travel to the moon in a second at 10c for a tenth of a second you could do the same. The thing about stutterwarp is that you move smaller distances but you do it repeatedly in a rapid stuttering fashion. Obviously this guy thinks he has overcome the issue you have (rightly) focused on. He could well be wrong, but wouldn’t it be nice if he wasn’t.
I agree with your math and your logic. However his math still doesn’t work, because he can’t hold it for 1 millionth of a second. And when you are talking about potential power on a nuclear scale and 10kg goes to 1bln kg then at reasonable densities you start to have a volume problem. The volume of the vessel holding your fuel and also the volume of your reactor.
But of course, it would be great if he could crack it.
You obviously have a greater understanding of this then most (if not all) of the rest of us. Is this a profession with you or just an interest?
I’m just a nerd that loves this stuff….
I was also randomly in an introductory astrophysics class at Princeton in ’95 when this research was first published and my smoking hot preceptorial TA happened to be shagging a research assistant of a South American theorhetical mathematician named Alsubiere(sp) who came up with this stuff (probably while high on peyote).
Needless to say she was excited about it, and because she was so hot we were all excited to see her excited about it, and we spent several afternoons day dreaming about being seduced by her as she went over it in class.
And how do you know he hasn’t cracked it? (Unless obviously you’re sitting on some confidential NASA documents)
Because there are laws in the universe and he is basing his theory on the warp bubble theory. There aren’t that many moving parts and while he may have cracked something ob be doing something beautiful on an atomic level it does not scale within this theory to things that even remotely approach macroscopic size.
Like I said though, good luck to him…
He claims he has overcome the exact problem the you keep restating. I think the enthusiast should give the professional a chance.
He claims to have overcome it on an atomic scale…
What about where he says “you will only need 500 kilograms to “send a 10-metre bubble at an effective velocity of 10c.”
Not that I’m big on this subject, but having been taught by people who worked at NASA I know its best to assume they know what they are on about, or at least have put together enough of a proposal to get funding / lab time.
History has proven again and again that as knowledge is refined, earlier assumptions are usually incorrect and the real figures can be dramatically different. Such as the amount of material needed to build a nuclear bomb.
For a time/distance of what? The answer to that is a number so close to zero that it is effectively zero…
His theories only work when that 10 meter bubble becomes a 10 atom wide bubble…
I only said that by the time we get there we’d be shrinking armies and living on a basketball…
I really hope we get to see this in action in our lifetimes, would be a great achievement.
“With our current propulsion technologies, interstellar flight is impossible”
I thought it was possible, it would just take a VERY long time and a very accurate trajectory?
I think he meant the relevance of intersteller flight in the context of the human lifespan.
Or maybe he didn’t…..
To get to our closest system would take about twenty years onboard the ship assuming you could reach about 0.97c peak velocity, but lifetimes would pass for those on earth, damn you relativity!
I think I read somewhere that it would take decades (or maybe hundreds) of years to even get up to .9c or however fast we could go and then that long again to slow down at rates that wouldn’t instantly kill us…
Anyone know the actual answer? I think accellerating at a maximum rate for 30 yrs and then slowing at the same rate for the same amount of time and we wouldn’t make it 1/4 of the way to the next star system. I seem to remember hearing it in a science class somewhere in the past 30yrs…
I wonder if the ship will have free WiFi?
Finally, a relevant question!
They need to concentrate on holodecks, transporters and forcefields (I think their technologies are linked) and then life would be sweet
Holodecks and forcefields are linked however the transporter is a separate technology that has more links to replicator technology, The replicators and transporters are energy/mass converters the holodeck uses forcefields to simulate contact with matter.
I think currently technology is moving forward in terms of holography than site-to-site teleportation (which I would like first). Energy/mass converters are still a long way off I think. Probably passed our time.
Personally I think we will have a Lt. Commander DATA before a fully functional holodeck that you can physically interact with. AI research and robotics are coming along nicely.
Exactly, hopefully he won’t turn on us and act out genocide against the entire human race.
No way would Data go rogue (unless there was an evil plot he had to foil and appear to go evil)….going to meet Brent Spiner at Star Trek convention next month
His evil brother Lure did, look what happened there.
Lore was an earlier model and not available for general release.
In response to your ST Convention. I’m also going! I’m just sorting out who I am taking.
Is current teleportation tech really teleportation or just replication? I mean the thing you are sending doesn’t really go anywhere does it? A new one just appears at the other end. (I know that’s an awkward way to describe quantam states, but if you are answering this you know what I am getting at)…
I’m not entirely sure of today’s teleportation methods. I do know they are able to transfer data and/or information via light. That I believe is replication. Information sent on how to re-build what is on the other side. Almost information cloning. But that is still baby steps till a full human being can be disassembled and then reassembled.
I think Teleportation in terms of Star Trek’s universe is defined as matter rearrangement and subsequent transfer through a medium and then reassembly of the matter.
In ST they physically move the matter through space.
I ‘believe’ that replicator tech is also used within holodecks as you can eat, drink and get injured (if the safety protocols are disabled)….(unless we’re really pushing the limits of what is a forcefield / solid object.
For example the EMS (Doctor) on Voyager is a hologram that can be solid or not seemingly at ‘will’….
I suppose there may Bea replication element within it however the original holodeck before the upgrade was merely basic interactions with a fixed physical environment.