Yesterday an appeals court helped the RIAA extort some £140,000-odd from Jammie Thomas-Rasset for distributing just 24 songs on the internet. The original verdict called for a preposterous penalty of £1.2 million. Sure, this new amount of just under £6,000 a song is lower, but ugh, it's still absurd and horrible.
It's been just a few weeks since an appeals court judge denied the appeal of regular dude Joel Tenenbaum, effectively forcing him to pay £426,000-odd for distributing 31 songs on Kazaa. But the RIAA's latest trampling of an ordinary citizen is a larger symbolic victory. This lawsuit, in particular, made headlines when it was launched in 2007 because Thomas-Rasset is a mother of four, who would never be able to repay the huge quantities of money the recording industry's lawyers demanded in court. The case isn't over, and Thomas-Rasset's lawyers will surely examine their options going forward, but this is definitely a major setback for her case.
After a series of appeals in which the final penalty has fluctuated from £33,550 to over £1 million nobody's ever been able to get the case thrown out as the heinous injustice it is. We've said it before: At most these file-sharing incidents should end in a slap on the wrist. Nobody's saying piracy is right, but ruining people's lives in an effort to make an example is dishonorable and disingenuous. If the RIAA insists on continuing to sue their customers, they shouldn't be surprised if in the end they have no customers left at all. [CNET]