While there’s been no end of speculation about Google’s Project Glass, nobody’s actually had chance to try the technology out independently — until now. The Wall Street Journal’s Spencer Ante was lucky enough to try a pair of the glasses out for 10 minutes, and his verdict is mixed.
He explains that the glasses weigh just a few ounces, with an embedded camera and that all-important heads-up display we’ve long been hoping for, which projects data into the user’s field of vision on a small screen above the right eye. He explains what they’re like to use:
In all, the glasses are like a wearable smartphone, allowing the user to take pictures, send messages and perform other functions via voice-activated commands. For instance, say “OK, Glass” into one of the glasses’ two microphones and a menu pops off to the side of your vision showing icons that will let you take a picture, record a video, use Google Maps or make a phone call.
After 10 minutes of playing with the glasses-which the company prefers to call Google Glass, since they don’t have lenses-I could see their long-term potential. The device fit well. It was easy to snap a picture or video without taking my smartphone out of my pocket. It was cool to see the information there in front of my right eye, though a little disorienting. I kept closing my left eye, which was uncomfortable.
All told, it’s clearly too early to tell how good the glasses will be, because the software that will provide most of their functionality isn’t finished yet. Sergey Brin explained to Ante that the HUD mapping system wasn’t ready, nor was the phone functionality. With a £1,000-odd early-adopter launch coming up next year, the pressure’s on. [WSJ]













WSJ: Ping Is Dead
BT Trials Cable-Meltingly Fast Broadband
Free BBM Music Trial Extended by Six Months
“For instance, say “OK, Glass”…”
Please let this command be customisable to “Go, go Gadget Glass”.
Deceptive headline is deceptive. Deceptive headline relating to Google Glass in unsurprising.
Where did all the hate of Google Glass come from? Was there any particular incident?
Don’t think so, every so often they take a huge dislike to something, like the Galaxy Note. And it doesn’t matter if it’s brilliant, or a huge success they’ll keep hating on it.
I really don’t know. You would expect advances in wearable computing to make tech geeks excited, not inclined to overemphasise the negatives in every singe article. I suggest people read the sourch if they are interested in balance.
It’s strange how quickly they dislike a Google product, almost as if they realise all those Android fans will jump to its defence and produce more page clicks. Well I’m not falling for that one!
DOH!
So because the WSJ monkey isn’t used to using a monocular HUD he finds it disorienting after 10 mins and a little uncomfortable because he’s naturally closing his left eye to try to focus on the HUD. Not unsurprising, but hardly a damning review.
Less sensational click-baiting please.
Actually quite surprised that Jamie quoted the entire paragraph he mined the headline from.
Honestly, after that article from Scott Cleland (What Really Made Steve Jobs so Angry at Google?) the other day I don’t think I’ll ever be surprised by Gizmodo hating on Google and its products again.
wonder if steve jobs’ glasses were smart? the key to his “vision”.
but i mean really, why would anybody want to wear these. at least wait until they are geordi la forge – a – likes.
y’all could probably chill a little
agreed gizmodo go for the sensational headline to get you to read the same as most newspapers do but the article is fine and i sense no disturbance in the force here
perhaps the headline “WSJ, Through the Google glass” or something would have been better but its hardly hateful what they went with
I’m sure if they were white and had a little apple on the side these would work much better and be less disorientating to wear.
I bet if you stuck an apple logo on them, then people would “Love them” with all the hearts.
For me I like em anyway, as long as Google can pack tons of cool technology in em, Im sold.