The Nikon 1 V2 is a total overhaul of its predecessor. The hope is that the higher-resolution sensor, bigger body, and amateur-friendly features will turn a legion of aspiring beginners into lens-swapping, accessory-toting photographers. We think? Otherwise this camera makes no sense.
When Nikon waded into the mirrorless, interchangeable-lens camera market last year with its first two Nikon 1 cameras, it gambled, to the chagrin of snooty Nikon fans everywhere, on a smaller sensor size. The system’s 13.2mm x 8.8mm CX format image sensors are tiny. The micro four thirds and APS-C sensors on the camera’s competitors are two and three times larger respectively. No matter what fancy tricks Nikon tries to pull with image processing, this huge sensor size disparity puts the Nikon 1 cameras at a huge disadvantage in terms of image quality. On specs these cameras are a lost cause.
The only possible explanation for these pathetic specs is that Nikon instead of maximising potential image quality, Nikon is out to maximise the experience of taking pictures. In short it wants to make people feel like pros even if they’re not.
Let’s start with the camera’s body, which has been redesigned to look and feel more like a DSLR. The Nikon 1 V2 has a big textured grip that gives the body a heftier, more professional feel than last year’s V1, which had a slim body like a point-and-shoot camera. The mode dial has also been moved from a weird position on the back to its conventional spot by the shutter release.
As for its guts, the most noticeable change is the V2′s new 14.2 megapixel sensor, compared to the 10.1-megapixel sensor on the V1. More pixels, means smaller pixels, and while this could hurt the sensor’s ability to capture light, Nikon claims that the sensor is even better than before: It’s good up to a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6400 (compared to 3200 before. But again, this camera’s image quality will be smoked by the competition.
But the V2 isn’t pixel nerds, it’s for people who don’t know one image sensor from the next, which is why it’s loaded with all sorts of feature shooting modes. Last year, we got a Motion Snapshot, which was actually a pretty cool feature that captures very short, super-slow motion clips. Not for the pros, maybe, but still neat. But the new “Best Moment Capture Mode” might as well be called an “I don’t know what the hell I’m doing mode.” The feature literally slows down what’s going on in front of you so that you can capture it better.
Now there’s nothing wrong with styling and designing a camera that’s designed for amateurs, and indeed, we find that some of our favorite mirrorless cameras can be a little tough to use owing to their small size. But clueless photographers with money to burn seems like a narrow set to build a camera for. Maybe an easy-to-use, unsophisticated feature camera is just what people want for £800 (bundled with a 10-30mm lens). If so, these folks will have it when the Nikon 1 V2 is available November 22nd. [Nikon]













Leica M: Is This the Craziest Full-Frame, HD Video, Interchangeable Lens Monster Ever Made?
Polaroid iM1836: This Interchangeable-Lens Android Camera Seems Too Good to Be True
Sony NEX-3N Hands-On: The Teeniest Tiniest Interchangeable Lens Camera
WOW someone hates nikon lol
i have a full size Nikon DSLR and i treated myself to the Nikon 1 V1
and i can heartily vouch for both, the big one is great when i am out and about with the intention of taking photographs.
the Nikon 1 is handier when on family trips due to it’s size
the colours are crisp and sharp, indoor shots are amazing and the video recording is top notch.
I agree with the fact that the above camera is now bulky which defeats the object of have a small compact interchangeable-lens camera, i wouldn’t want to upgrade to this (bad move nikon).
as for 10 megapixels well i am more than happy with 10, they are more than big enough to be featured full page in a magazine or printed out.
Agree about the styling, i think they’ve looked at the Olympus OM-D and decided to try to recreate their old F4, not sure it’s worked.
Unrelated question.
How good is the Pentax K30? Or is Canon better? I’m a beginner.
its the whole apple/android argument, best thing is to pop into jessops and have a play and see what you like the best.
Yeah, £800 is seriously pricey for people who don’t have a clue how to use a camera… or don’t intend to learn how to use one, either; looking at the wheel, it looks like they don’t seem to have included the usual options of aperture/shutter/manual modes… unless their buried in menus. Either way thats kind of a ‘kthanxbai’ for anyone who’s more into serious photography, who might be willing to pay that price for the camera.
Related: You can tell just how dumb the average camera owner ( not photographer… ) is by the fact that 99% keep their camera on Auto mode. Case in point; despite the fact the average flash range is 10-15 meters at best, everyone at the Olympics opening & closing ceremonies obviously didn’t bother to alter their camera settings and left flash mode to auto…
P is for Pro man.