Michael Brutsch, who was outed as “jailbait” porn-obsessed Reddit mod Violentacrez last week and lost his job in the process, has spoken to US news network CNN about his Reddit use and whether he’s sorry about it or not.
Brutsch, who posted in and created the “Jailbait” photo section of the site along with numerous other porn-related sub-forums, offered a relatively humble apology for his actions, telling CNN’s reporter: “I’m sorry, I have made mistakes, I understand that, you know, Reddit encouraged and enabled this sort of behaviour and I shouldn’t have been a part of it.”
Here’s the interview:
He tries to justify himself a little, outlining how he’d fallen into the habit of posting stacks of porn to the site, breaking it down by category. Women with big tits went in the big tits section, black women went in the black women section and girls of legally dubious age went in the jailbait bit.
Brutsch also tries to separate himself from the “character” of Violentacrez, claiming he was playing to an audience of kids who appreciated his “gallows humour” mixture of dodgy porn and rape joke posts. It all sounds so perfectly reasonable when put like that. [CNN via Atlantic Wire]













He looks like a really annoyed beaver.
snigger
that didn’t even occur to me, but now you have pointed it out its all i can see
lol
I’m just gonna leave this here:
http://clinock.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/mid_beavers.jpg
I was thinking more: http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l7z04iuOa51qaa9rq.jpg
Did he have a category for ‘annoyed beaver’?
Can’t stand the sanctimonious approach to this story. Yes, he’s a pervert who’s thrown his life away. But at the same time the likes of TMZ and Daily Mail post pics of young girls in bikinis in suggestive photographs. It’s a god damned fallacy to think anyone at Reddit didn’t know about this.
The media have really grabbed onto the word ‘troll’, haven’t they? Seems like they’re using it to describe anyone who’s ever done anything bad online instead of someone just trying to piss people off through provocative messages. He’s not a troll. He’s a pervert.
I really wish I read this article before googling what Jailbait was.
I wish you would leave him alone now.
You’ve done your story that outed his name.
You got him fired.
You poked fun of his attempt to get a new job
and now you’ve poked fun of his interview.
All because someone decided they didn’t like what he was posting. As far as I know he didn’t break the law, it was just un tasteful.
I think it’s time to leave him alone and let him rebuild his life.
Couldn’t agree more. He hasn’t broken the law and for some reason, perhaps money from page views, he’s being unfairly targeted by Gawker. I would be surprised if there isn’t some sort of law against what they’ve done, it’s certainly no better than most of these other “trolls” we hear about.
But just in case you think Michael Brutsch has a sliver of a conscience about his behavior he pins all that bad stuff on the reddit community and its staff. Which may actually be right on the money as they tacitly allowed the troll to go about his business knowing full well he wasn’t getting paid (free labor is yummy, please Erik Martin hire Michael Brutsch he needs you more than ever now) and at the same time inciting followers and bringing truckloads of ad dollars to the site with his bruising truck driver tactics on a foggy speedy highway.
So much for freedom of speech….?
http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2012/10/reddits-violentacrez-goes-on-cnn-to-defend-why-he-acted-like-a-troll/