Here’s a possible explanation as to how Apple became so successful: Steve Jobs might’ve been from the future. That’s not true, of course, but to hear him nail so many predictions about modern technology back in 1983, it begins to feel like the only explanation.
Just listen to the speech Steve Jobs gave to the International Design Conference in Aspen in 1983. It’s like Jobs knew that Apple was going to make the iPad; that mobile was the future; that the App Store was necessary; that everything was going to be networked wirelessly, and that things like Google Street View and Siri would start to take over our lives. It seems easy to predict this now but Steve Jobs made this speech in 1983. For context, the Macintosh hadn’t even been released yet. The best selling computer was the Apple II and the second most popular PC was made by IBM. Michael Jackson just moonwalked for the very first time and Ronald Reagan started talking about Star Wars missiles. This was a long, long, long time ago.
Here are a few noteworthy excerpts from Jobs vision of the future, as put together by Marcel Brown, who digitised the cassette tape that the ‘lost’ speech was on. Just listen to Jobs talk about something that sounds very much like the iPad we use today:
“Apple’s strategy is really simple. What we want to do is we want to put an incredibly great computer in a book that you can carry around with you and learn how to use in 20 minutes. That’s what we want to do and we want to do it this decade. And we really want to do it with a radio link in it so you don’t have to hook up to anything and you’re in communication with all of these larger databases and other computers.”
Jobs was off by more than a few decades but book-sized computer that’s easy to use? Yep. According to Brown, here is some other future predicting stuff that Jobs said in his speech:
- He confidently talks about the personal computer being a new medium of communication. Again, this is before networking was commonplace or there was any inkling of the Internet going mainstream. Yet he specifically talks about early e-mail systems and how it is re-shaping communication. He matter-of-factly states that when we have portable computers with radio links, people could be walking around anywhere and pick up their e-mail. Again, this is 1983, at least 20 years before the era of mobile computing.
- He mentions an experiment done by MIT that sounds very much like a Google Street View application.
- He compares the nascent software development industry to the record industry. He says that most people didn’t necessarily know what computer they wanted to buy. In contrast, when walking into a record store they definitely knew what music they liked. This was because they got free samples of songs by listening to the radio. He thought that the software industry needed something like a radio station so that people could sample software before they buy it. He believed that software distribution through traditional brick-and-mortar was archaic since software is digital and can be transferred electronically through phone lines. He foresees paying for software in an automated fashion over the phone lines with credit cards. I don’t know about you, but I think this sounds incredibly similar to the concept of the Apple App Store. Plus his comparison to the music industry just might be foreshadowing the iTunes store. You need to listen to the speech to hear the entirety of this passage for yourself.
Head over to Life, Liberty and Tech to hear the entire Steve Jobs speech and see more excerpts that Brown was able to jot down. In all, there’s 20 minutes of never-before-heard footage. You should check it out. [Life, Liberty and Tech via TNW]













Has Steve Ballmer Lost The Support Of Microsoft Employees?
Emails From the Command-Line: The Lost USB Stick
The Lost Samsung Galaxy S III Advert, From 1985
I like the image with a bite out of the Apple. A lot of people think that the name for Apple and the logo with the bite in it is in honour of Alan Turing; the father of modern computing.
Stephen Fry said on his BBC TV show QI that he’d asked Jobs about the Apple logo and Turing. Jobs replied “It isn’t true, but God we wish it were!”
A lovely creation myth that isn’t going to go away anytime soon. I personally want the Apple logo to refer to Turing. It’s rainbow-coloured alternate is more extraordinary because it could also imply a reference to Turing’s homosexuality.
So what you’re saying is ‘Rainbows are gay’..
http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/25509252.jpg
Rainbow colours are gay, bisexual, lesbian and transgender.
aren’t the rainbow colours a general symbol of egalitarianism that has been taken up a by those mentioned above? i may be wrong
Yes, you are right that the colours reference Egalitarianism. But I was referring to more sexuality.
Why should a corporate logo be a reference to any individual’s sexuality?
It’s a personal preference. Not a fact.
Fair enough. Would you be happy, therefore, for other companies’ logos to reference the heterosexuality of their relevant luminaries?
I think you are misinterpreting what I am saying. I never said that they should nor that companies ARE using their logos to incorporate personal luminaries. I was simply stating how cool it was that a logo could consist of so much symbolism to one particular individual and his life’ work. Any how that is the current prevailing, albeit false, opinion of the coloured-apple/apple logo.
Coincidental is all it remains to be. And in future, if a company decide they wish to use a logo that references an individual it should be done without predilection to any sexuality.
Actually, there is some question about Turing’s “suicide”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18561092
- it may have been a tragic accident. I don’t believe he killed himself, given the evidence…..
I read that article weeks ago. I’m aware of his experiments with cyanide.
“Apple’s strategy is really simple. What we want to do is we want to put an incredibly great computer in a book that you can carry around with you and learn how to use in 20 minutes. That’s what we want to do and we want to do it this decade. And we really want to do it with a radio link in it so you don’t have to hook up to anything and you’re in communication with all of these larger databases and other computers.”
sounds like a laptop, im sure they were around in ’83 werent they?
to me it sounds like he watched sci-fi as stuff from the 60s and 70s predicted wireless stuff too.
and the app store thing is nothing like the actual app store. i remember demos of stuff in the 80s too. on those huge 5.25″ floppies and cassette.
sure, he pushed a few things along but it wasnt rocket science to suggest 1 day that we wouldnt need wires. how old is the ‘wireless’ radio.
That is one awful photoshop…
no teeth marks on the apple confirms to me that Jobs was some form of reptilian overlord.
So, predict something will happen this decade and when it doesn’t happen for 30 years you to can be called a “visionary” and a “genius”. I predict that the worldwide economy will be back on it’s feet and flourishing within 5 years.
I predict that the next winner of the X-Factor won’t go on to become a successful artist
I predict Gizmodo will publish a pointless article about the Iphone in the next 2 days
But will you be at the forefront of bringing that prediction into reailty?
In 30 years time I’m planning to be dead. Mind you, I said that 30 years ago.
I had, what I thought was a good reply. But it was too harsh.
So I’ll just say this. Steve predicted it, acted upon it and made what the current tablet world is today.
That is something not many people could do.
I Agree that he was a very clever man and probably deservers to be considered one of the great facilitators of innovation in his field. My argument was with mister Chan’s comment about how amazing his predictions were. These were common idea’s that had been shown in science fiction and futurologists prediction for ages and as I said making a prediction that something will happen this decade doesn’t make you a genius when it happens 3 decades later, If someone predicted in 1967 that Manchester united would win the league again in the 60′s would you think they deserved plaudits when they finally did so in 1993?
Or rather, they perceive that they could not do it.
I am going to help bring my prediction into reality by not watching the X Factor or listening to any of their music. Who’s with me?!
What is X Factor?
Good afternoon Hindsight Bias, glad to see you’re alive and well. I was afraid that smart journalism might have killed you off.