<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s Samsung Apology Hits the UK Newspapers, But Doesn&#8217;t Seem Any More Heartfelt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131746</link>
		<dc:creator>JJarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131746</guid>
		<description>Mr Cutlack, you are a journalist. Whilst Giz UK isn&#039;t that well known, you still have a duty to not misinform people and spread falsities.

Apple were never ordered to apologise to Samsung; it was an order to publicly state that they lost the case and that Samsung&#039;s design did not infringe upon their patent. That&#039;s all.

Now, I order you to rewrite this article and link it for 6 months on your homepage with a link at least 100 pixels high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Cutlack, you are a journalist. Whilst Giz UK isn&#8217;t that well known, you still have a duty to not misinform people and spread falsities.</p>
<p>Apple were never ordered to apologise to Samsung; it was an order to publicly state that they lost the case and that Samsung&#8217;s design did not infringe upon their patent. That&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>Now, I order you to rewrite this article and link it for 6 months on your homepage with a link at least 100 pixels high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pduran</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131680</link>
		<dc:creator>pduran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131680</guid>
		<description>Wait, didn&#039;t Forestal get in hot water for not apologizing? I&#039;m so confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, didn&#8217;t Forestal get in hot water for not apologizing? I&#8217;m so confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131612</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131612</guid>
		<description>This silly situation would not have come about if Ghoul-gul and SamDung had not ripped-off and blatantly copied the designs of one fruit themed shiny gadget flogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This silly situation would not have come about if Ghoul-gul and SamDung had not ripped-off and blatantly copied the designs of one fruit themed shiny gadget flogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: how_many_bean_counters_does_it_take_to_count_5_beans</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131538</link>
		<dc:creator>how_many_bean_counters_does_it_take_to_count_5_beans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131538</guid>
		<description>Not possible in the UK: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/24/section/2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not possible in the UK: <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/24/section/2" rel="nofollow">http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/24/section/2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAL1966</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131528</link>
		<dc:creator>PAL1966</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131528</guid>
		<description>Oh come on, just say sorry :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on, just say sorry <img src='http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bikerlifestyle</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131525</link>
		<dc:creator>bikerlifestyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131525</guid>
		<description>if apple had done this in the first place there would have been the initial publicity but it would have died down quickly and no one would have cared, But they had to act like a spoiled brat, and really this does them no harm, Apple fans will still be apple fans, so really don&#039;t know why they messed about the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if apple had done this in the first place there would have been the initial publicity but it would have died down quickly and no one would have cared, But they had to act like a spoiled brat, and really this does them no harm, Apple fans will still be apple fans, so really don&#8217;t know why they messed about the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131510</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131510</guid>
		<description>This is a problem the media seem to be having. This is not an apology merely an acknowledgement. They only need to publish the rulling, not admit they were wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a problem the media seem to be having. This is not an apology merely an acknowledgement. They only need to publish the rulling, not admit they were wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Udimion</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131496</link>
		<dc:creator>Udimion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131496</guid>
		<description>They weren&#039;t actually ordered to write an apology, they were ordered to publicly acknowledge that Samsung didn&#039;t copy them which this does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weren&#8217;t actually ordered to write an apology, they were ordered to publicly acknowledge that Samsung didn&#8217;t copy them which this does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131483</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131483</guid>
		<description>Apple, the word apology means that you include the words &quot;apology&quot;, &quot;apologise&quot; or &quot;sorry&quot; somewhere in your title. This just looks like a piece of legalese, reporting on a court judgement.

May the high court find you in contempt and fine you big. Just suck it up like a big boy and don&#039;t moan like a spoiled brat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple, the word apology means that you include the words &#8220;apology&#8221;, &#8220;apologise&#8221; or &#8220;sorry&#8221; somewhere in your title. This just looks like a piece of legalese, reporting on a court judgement.</p>
<p>May the high court find you in contempt and fine you big. Just suck it up like a big boy and don&#8217;t moan like a spoiled brat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharky66</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131467</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharky66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131467</guid>
		<description>I imagine if there had been a fine they would have paid it in 1p pieces!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine if there had been a fine they would have paid it in 1p pieces!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131457</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131457</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t even expect an apology - Apple are not being required to say sorry, just to publish the ruling that Samsung did not copy Apple (without any snarky comments about wins in other countries). This they have done. I expect their website version will be identicle in wording to this and to go up about 1 second before the end of the 48 hours they were given to comply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t even expect an apology &#8211; Apple are not being required to say sorry, just to publish the ruling that Samsung did not copy Apple (without any snarky comments about wins in other countries). This they have done. I expect their website version will be identicle in wording to this and to go up about 1 second before the end of the 48 hours they were given to comply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoggleboggle</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131456</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoggleboggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131456</guid>
		<description>if they had just shown this on their website they could have gotten away with it. That will teach them to be so arrogant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if they had just shown this on their website they could have gotten away with it. That will teach them to be so arrogant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: resis</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131453</link>
		<dc:creator>resis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131453</guid>
		<description>Apple&#039;s answer to how long it&#039;ll take to post the proper repsonse online reminds me of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiKpEvUShtY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s answer to how long it&#8217;ll take to post the proper repsonse online reminds me of this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiKpEvUShtY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiKpEvUShtY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tc789</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131445</link>
		<dc:creator>tc789</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131445</guid>
		<description>Its a whole lot better then what they put on their website, and I don&#039;t think the idea was for them to apologise, just to set the record straight that buying a Samsung Tablet wasn&#039;t illegal. 

The website statement was not only childish, but unclear as to what it actually meant, this is pretty straight to the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a whole lot better then what they put on their website, and I don&#8217;t think the idea was for them to apologise, just to set the record straight that buying a Samsung Tablet wasn&#8217;t illegal. </p>
<p>The website statement was not only childish, but unclear as to what it actually meant, this is pretty straight to the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharky66</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131439</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharky66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131439</guid>
		<description>Did anyone really expect heartfelt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone really expect heartfelt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildgeeza</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131432</link>
		<dc:creator>wildgeeza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131432</guid>
		<description>And our survey says....

&quot;AGH-ERRRRRRRRRGGGH!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And our survey says&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;AGH-ERRRRRRRRRGGGH!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulianT</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131428</link>
		<dc:creator>JulianT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131428</guid>
		<description>worst apology ever....I mean really, nil points for effort</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>worst apology ever&#8230;.I mean really, nil points for effort</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleary</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/apples-samsung-apology-hits-the-uk-newspapers-but-doesnt-seem-any-more-heartfelt/#comment-131416</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=117039#comment-131416</guid>
		<description>GROUP HUG!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GROUP HUG!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
