<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aptly-Named Titan Takes Supercomputer Crown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/aptly-named-titan-takes-supercomputer-crown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/aptly-named-titan-takes-supercomputer-crown/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EddyCJ</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/aptly-named-titan-takes-supercomputer-crown/#comment-135253</link>
		<dc:creator>EddyCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=119601#comment-135253</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MENTAL1ST</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/aptly-named-titan-takes-supercomputer-crown/#comment-135234</link>
		<dc:creator>MENTAL1ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=119601#comment-135234</guid>
		<description>No, Sequoia is based on PowerPC cpus. However, buying in a load of Nvidia Tesla cards would somewhat defeat the purpose of IBM&#039;s supercomputing endeavours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Sequoia is based on PowerPC cpus. However, buying in a load of Nvidia Tesla cards would somewhat defeat the purpose of IBM&#8217;s supercomputing endeavours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EddyCJ</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/aptly-named-titan-takes-supercomputer-crown/#comment-135100</link>
		<dc:creator>EddyCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=119601#comment-135100</guid>
		<description>I think Sequoia is already a GPU-based supercomputer, although I haven&#039;t Googled this first, so I may be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Sequoia is already a GPU-based supercomputer, although I haven&#8217;t Googled this first, so I may be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeo</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/aptly-named-titan-takes-supercomputer-crown/#comment-135031</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=119601#comment-135031</guid>
		<description>Jaguar? Pfft. Isn&#039;t that OSX 10.2 or something? 

Not impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaguar? Pfft. Isn&#8217;t that OSX 10.2 or something? </p>
<p>Not impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/aptly-named-titan-takes-supercomputer-crown/#comment-135019</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=119601#comment-135019</guid>
		<description>So Titan is just an upgrade of Jaguar. All IBM have to do is the same kind of upgrade to Sequoia to get the crown back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Titan is just an upgrade of Jaguar. All IBM have to do is the same kind of upgrade to Sequoia to get the crown back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
