Despite the general incompetence of Soviet long-range nuclear bombers, the US couldn’t allow a single such plane to reach American airspace. Its response—a new breed of fighter jet with an unprecedented wing design and handling.
The Convair F-102 “interceptor” was the first fighter to incorporate a tailless delta wing design anywhere in the world. It was designed exclusively to intercept Soviet bombers and as such was built with nothing but unbridled speed and agility in mind. Based on the work of renowned German engineer Alexander Lippisch, this single-seat supersonic fighter measured 68 feet in length with a 38-foot wingspan. A single Pratt & Whitney J57-P-25 afterburning turbojet propelled the F-102 Delta Dagger to Mach 1.25 with an operational ceiling of 53,400 feet. Its delta wing design allowed the F-102 harder cornering at higher speeds than anything a conventionally winged aircraft can accomplish. It entered active service in 1956 and over the course of its 20 year service, more than a 1,000 were built.
The Delta Dagger was outfitted with two dozen 70mm unguided rockets, 6 AIM-4 Falcon air-to-air missiles, and a single AIM-26 Falcon that could be loaded with a nuclear warhead—enough to lay low a fleet of Soviet bombers over the Pacific. But engaging aircraft at supersonic speeds is far easier said than done, so the Delta Dagger incorporated a cutting-edge (by 1950′s standards at least) computerized fire control systems (FCS) that would automatically track, target, and fire upon enemy aircraft—without pilot intervention.
The F-102 served as the backbone of American air defense for more than 20 years, seeing action in Vietnam. By 1976, however, the F-102 was retired from active service and replaced by the even faster F-106 Delta Dart, which could reach Mach 2.













The US Navy's Robot Jet Fighter Goes for Its First Cruise
How to Prevent Running Blisters
Disaster Prevention Building Is a Disaster Itself
Yeah, sure. The only reason the USSR didn’t “go termonuclear” on USA was the aforementioned fighter. After all, without this nothing would stop them from starting WW3. Except maybe the fact that USA would most certainly retaliate sending it’s own nuclear attack.
Whoever wrote this post should at least get some education about war/power games etc. Even I in my complete ignorance about military affairs can see that building a nuclear arsenal is much more related to deterrence and politic power than it is to attacking intentions.
True.
I see your F-102 and raise you an English Electric Lightning
Too right!
Author might be interested in looking up Avro 707 as well – (‘mini’ test aircraft for the Vulcan)
Tailless? That’s a bloody big tail on the photo….
Ah, just researched it – depends on the definition of tail. I still thinks that big vertical fin constitutes a tail, but never mind!