Our big boy Windows Vista is turning six today, and like any proud, overbearing and slightly embarrassing parent, we want to give a little speech. Only, in this case, we want to remind you just why Vista was a godforsaken OS with more design flaws than the Leaning Tower of Pisa. Happy Birthday, buddy.
Look, we’re used to getting shafted by tech companies when it comes to UK pricing. Microsoft, though, really took the piss when it came to Vista pricing. For the privilege and honour of upgrading your system to the mighty Vista, UK customers were expected to fork over £100 — and that was just for the non-singing, non-dancing Basic version. Not toooooo bad, you might be thinking — but in the US, it cost just 100 dollars. Back in 2007, the exchange rate was basically 2:1, which means Microsoft was charging us double the real price of Vista. Grrrr.
Vista’s biggest change, for most people, was the supposedly-sexy new Aero interface. It was meant to add a touch of 21-century 3D desktop magic, but it ended up sucking the life-blood out of your computer’s hardware. This wasn’t helped by Microsoft lowering its ‘minimum’ hardware standards to help manufacturers; this left Vista running on cheapo laptops at the pace of an arthritic snail. In fact, a fair few computers were actually slower on Vista than on XP — that’s not how an upgrade’s meant to work.
This leads nicely into Vista’s next failing. For a supposedly new OS, it relied far too much on XP-era interfaces for anything slightly complicated. Once you delved past the nannying questions into something like Device Manager, it was straight back to XP-style window. Truth be told, Vista’s UI reminds me somewhat of manufacturer skins on Android — sure, they look nice, but often they slow down a perfectly good OS, and dig too far and you land back in the old UI.
The User Interface problem wasn’t helped by Media Centre. The idea was Media Centre gave a hub for all your media files, and also a control for TV tuners. That’s all well and good, but the overwhelming majority of people never connected their laptops to a big screen, or used a TV tuner. Nonetheless, Windows (in Premium and Ultimate editions, at least) slapped everyone with Media Centre.
It sucked as a ‘Media Centre’ for a laptop because it yanked you out of the desktop and into an irritating, slow, buggy interface that was basically just a souped-up skin for Windows Media Player. Fine, so anyone with common sense installed VLC and didn’t look back, but for far too many helpless victims, Vista meant a really terrible media experience.
With any big release, driver support is always going to be an issue; with Vista, Microsoft ballsed it up even more by failing to get key players like NVIDIA to provide stable drivers at launch. Sure, not being able to plug your webcam in is annoying, but having no driver for your graphics card is a real buzzkill.
One of the big things Vista integrated was User Account Control, which required users to click “OK” on a pop-up pretty much any time they did anything. It was meant to get in your face and force you to second-guess decisions — even Microsoft were quoted as saying “the reason we put UAC into the platform was to annoy users“. It went way too far, though, since the crazy stupid number of pop-ups meant that if you wanted to get anything done, you just mashed “OK” on anything that popped up, leading to situations like this:
“Want to install this program?”
“Yes, of course I do you dumb machine, that’s why I clicked run”
“Want to install this dodgy virus that’ll steal your identity and first-born child?”
“ANYTHING, JUST GET RID OF THE FREAKING POP-UP!”
Needless to say, Microsoft’s cunning security feature wasn’t exactly a big hit with users.
Initially, Microsoft was very eager to get the whole world and their doggies running Vista, so they stopped sale of XP. Considering that Vista was a buggy piece of crap, this upset many intelligent folk who wanted the comforting stability and security of XP. Eventually, Microsoft relented, but not until they’d pissed off a small horde of customers.
For whatever reason, Microsoft’s shiny new OS was generally a little bit worse at running games than XP, an OS six years older than it. That’s inexcusable. One of the awesome things about Windows 8 is that almost everything runs faster, giving you a solid reason to upgrade to it. Vista was pretty much the complete opposite to this.
For some reason, Microsoft felt the need to take things that had worked perfectly well before — like “add or remove programs” — and turn them into badly named, lopsided and just plain worse features like “uninstall or change a program or feature”. Not only that, but Microsoft also buried useful stuff in patronisingly-named holes under miles of crap, like the goddamn “Network and Sharing Centre”, which sounds more like a hippie meditation retreat than somewhere you go to sort out your Wi-Fi.
Ultimately, Microsoft jumped the gun with Vista. They were so keen to get out an update to a perfectly good operating system that they put out a half-arsed, buggy beta release of 7, that just happened to be called Vista and cost you real money. XP wasn’t desperately broken in 2007; if Microsoft had held on for another year or two and skipped Vista altogether, they would’ve saved themselves a lot of face, and the rest of the world a whole tonne of dough.













XD – Great article, Chris.
Close call but Windows Millenium was just as shit as Vista
*Shudder*
damn you beat me to it, microsoft needs to wipe vista and M.E. from their history books
windows xp was and still is an excellent operating system
although windows 7 is a proper upgrade to xp and i really like 7
i can see 7 being the diehard os that XP is
Windows Vista was made after Windows 7, the 7 dev team said they need a few more years so Microsoft got a new team of devs to make Vista as a filler.
Not quite
And meanwhile, Longhorn was really glitzy and awesome – nothing like Vista ended up as.
LOL! Nice one Chris. Once I told my colleague that 98 was the best Windows so far and he thought I was exposed by radiation.
Hmm, errr… eh?
98 was based on the old consumer core that started with 95 and finished with ME. I got used to seeing blue screens a lot on those old horrors. 2000 was the first effort to bring the more stable NT core into the mainstream. That was such a revolution after 98 and NT4.
Totally agree. Windows 8 is another big change and even though the surface is in a little bit of mess, change was necessary.
Oh god, the USB support was HORRIBLE in 98…thank god for Win2000 and native driver support for things like USB memory sticks. No such luck in Win98. And by god was networking a dark art with win95/win98.
Sometimes it’s better to look forward than back.
Yep, I remember using floppy drives to format before backing up the best porns. Good old days.
Indeed sir I do, I remember it used to take forever to install as well 21 floppy disks in all it took me to install windows 95.
3 for DOS 6
5 for windows 3.1
13 for Windows 95 upgrade.
There must have been an easier way to do it, I hated when you baught the “Upgrade” version of windows and needed to format then had to put the older version back on first just so you could upgrade it as the upgrade would not let you install from blank.
See I used to feel very special about doing all the hard work (formatting HD, putting new RAM, downgrade to upgrade) while I was in my teens. Now I don’t even get time to put custom ROM on my Androids
same as you, i was forever sorting people problems out fixing their computers, upgrading etc.. but these days i just cant be arsed, i just want the damn things to work, and a lot of problems i can sort from sitting here using teamviewer
and people still don’t understand that the extra stick or 2 of ram will make their old computers usable again
You are the RDP whiz
damn right i just cant be arsed to go to peoples houses to fiddle with their bits
unless its late at night and i am wearing a balaclava
LOL!
Loved it when you got to disk 15 after an age of feeding the floppy and it said “corrupt disk” arggggggggh
floppies cant remember if windows 95 was on 23 or 25 floppies
but i do remember the reinstalls lol
and i remember when hq porn clips were about 400k lol
kb
Hahahahaha!
“One of the awesome things about Windows 8 is that almost everything runs faster…”
Except for games…
I find that, too. And battery life is worse.
Really? That’s interesting. I thought I remembered early benchmarks either showing identical or very slightly better performance compared with 7. I haven’t noticed it get worse myself at any rate. *googles*
User Account Control is still present in Win7 & 8 too. It’s something I’ve just learned to deal with.
I also seem to remember Vista had some completely weird way of handling sound drivers in particular that was totally different from how XP did it. Worth a mention ?
>>It’s something I’ve just learned to deal with.
Read: I found out where it lives and turned it off, then I turned off the notifications that warn you that you have turned it off.
F**KING HATE UAC
This article is one of the few situations where the response “well it’s better than vista.” doesn’t work.
Most people who moaned about Vista don’t have a clue what they are talking about.
- Firstly, lack of driver support at launch was unfortunate but fairly inevitable with a redesigned OS
- Many the BSOD’s were caused by faulty third-party drivers
- Vista was launched at around the same time nVidia cocked up and released a load of faulty GPU’s that caused all sorts of problems
- Due to the enhanced prefetching many people assumed the OS was using too much memory and thrashing the disk drive.
- Lastly, Vista has had several service packs and these days it’s fairly bug free.
There were however some pretty awful bugs early on. File system performance was poor, and unzipping files would take literally hours when 7Zip could do the same in seconds.
It was, and remained throughout its life, disproportionately heavy on system requirements, however. Windows7 was considerably faster in general use from the outset.
Vista was also the first to highlight the 32- and 64-bit version difference, which was a mistake. They should just have killed the 32-bit version and gone wholly 64-bit from the off.
Due to the enhanced prefetching many people assumed the OS was using too much memory and thrashing the disk drive.
that above was partly True, the to much ram part was false (unless you had 1GB of ram then it was True as you needed 2GB of ram to run Vista Not 512MB as they stated as the min requrement was utter stupid even 1gb of ram was bad once an antivirus was installed)
Now Superfetch was an partly an issue in vista as it did not (and still does not) have any I/O Disk priority built in so it would fill up the ram cache up but keep on accessing the disk even if other stuff was accessing the disk as well so disk trashing would happen (windows 7 superfetch has I/O Priority so if some thing els access the disk superfetch stops until disk is free)
second disk trashing thing was Trusted installer/ System shaddow service/system restore, they at times can tie the disk up for up to 10 mins doing servicing tasks even when shutting the pc down as well it can sit there hammering the disk for about 10 mins
Vista for the most part is now ok (still it works better when the HDD is in RAID0 with 3-4 disks as i had setup at the time now 1 SSD is like having 10 HDDs in RAID0)
at least now windows 8 is out i can start selling loads more windows 7 refurb pcs as no one wants 8 pcs (as its very hard to find an XP pc now as most customers will not touch Vista pcs)
Huh, that’s weird. I could have sworn when Vista was released that Windows Zealots said it was better than anything else on the planet ever and they were very happy with it etc. etc.
Funny how the fog clears in time.
You must remember it differently to everyone else on the planet – everyone I know hated it from the second it came out.
Vista wasn’t that bad once you turned off UAC. I quite liked it myself, until win 7. I also heard that XP was shit on release, although didn’t get it myself that soon.
Wow, takes me back!!!
Logging on every day to a certain website waiting for the ‘hack’ that made Vista, well…
Ahem…
“In fact, a fair few computers were actually slower on Vista than on XP — that’s not how an upgrade’s meant to work.”
I have to argue with this point a little bit – most upgrades of any piece of software, especially significant ones, typically add some bloat (read: features) and therefore have higher system requirements. Also, upgrades (especially when it’s an OS) are usually built to take advantage of newer hardware specs & features.
Having used all OS since XP, agree Vista was uber crap to be mildly. Windows 7 is what should have been the replacement for XP. I have just installed Windows 8 on my other laptop, but struggling to accept it like I did Vista. Still using W7 as default OS and Laptop for everyday use.
Not sure you’re quite right on item 4.
First up, I’m pretty sure WMC isn’t a skin for Media Player in any shape or form.
You’re right that very few people used it (yet another example of Microsoft announcing a brand new ecosystem technology and then utterly failing to support it – PlaysForSure being another example) but it’s still the only really unified media solution around that does video, music, DVD/CD support, TV and PVR functions AND has a UI designed to be operated from your couch with a remote control.
VLC is clearly mouse-driven, and it doesn’t have live TV support or DVR, let alone multi-room operation (and I mean things like the ability to pause a live TV show in one room and resume on a different TV in another).
I used Vista Media Center to drive three or four TVs around my house for many years, and it worked very well (wife and three-year old could both use it without needing technical support).
Yes, Vista was a pig in many ways, but it could be made to work reliably.
You missed #11 – The fabled Windows Vista Ultimate Extras! The promise that if you bought the “Ultimate” edition you would get some amazing new features for free that no one else would ever get… I ran Vista from release until Windows 7 arrived, what extras did I get?
Animated fricking wallpaper.
When Windows 7 arrived I convinced myself that Microsoft would take pity on us Ultimate users and give us a discount on our upgrades… Like hell they did!