The good old selfie; outside of photos of food, they’re the staple diet of every teenager/wannabe Instagram/Facebook photo feed around the globe. I’ve had a hankering to do a Shooting Challenge on this topic for some time, but wanted to do more than just the usual ‘take a photo of yourself without pulling a duckface’ or posing in front of the bathroom mirror.
Unable to think of something other than ‘Bathroom Duckface’, I put it out of my mind. It wasn’t until Santa delivered some photo books this crimbo past, that it popped into the old noggin once more. As one of my lovely relatives had raided my Amazon Wishlist (the best invention EVER) and got me American photographer Lee Friedlander’s book Self Portrait (ISBN: 0870703382).
Originally published back in 1970, Self Portrait, is a collection of seemingly random ‘selfies’ shot over a period of years that shows Friedlander in the form of shadows against people and objects, reflections in shop windows and only occasionally in full view in the world around him. Whether mimicking the silhouette of someone walking down the street, or casting his shadow against a chair to give the impression of an invisible man, Friedlander toys with his place within the images, using his shadow or reflection in an almost mischievous manner.
As with most of the Shooting Challenges, the brief this week is less ‘how to use your camera’ and more ‘how to see things differently’. Your mission, if you chose to accept it, is to shoot your own ‘selfie’ against a streetscape (ie. not in front of the bathroom mirror) in the style of Friedlander’s 1960s collection.
Take some time to study Friedlander’s images, you can do this via a Google image search (Lee Friedlander: Self Portrait) or by buying his book.
Take your camera with you wherever you go.
Don’t plan but wander and explore the world around you. Friedlander’s book was an accumulation of six years of casual snaps and wasn’t a planned project.
Have fun, be mischievous, but be legal – no weirdo shots please.
Give your photos titles – I’d like an insight into your thinking.
Back in 1979, Lee Friedlander shot a series of nude photographs with a young student; the student’s name? Madonna Louise Ciccone. She was paid £20 for the shoot; twenty years later, one of the images was sold at auction for £25,000. I’ll let you discover those images for yourself.
- Submissions MUST be your own work.
- Submit up to five images
- Photos must be taken after the challenge was published; so no existing shots please.
- Minimal image post-processing is allowed (global changes to levels, brightness, contrast and cropping are permitted)
- Explain, briefly in your submission email, the equipment, settings, technique used and more importantly for this challenge, the story behind the image. Please ensure EXIF info is intact (if image was taken digitally).
- Email submissions to gizshootingchallenge@gmail.com, not me.
- Please ensure your image is at least 600px wide and less than 3MB in size.
- Save your image as a JPG, and use the following naming convention FirstnameLastnameSelfie.jpg
- Don’t forget to include a shooting summary (see above).
- Send your best photos by Monday, 21st January 2013 at 6pm UK time with “Selfie” in the subject line.
- Anyone can enter, regardless of location.
- The most important rule — HAVE FUN
Martin Snelling is a Hampshire-based man about town who works in the videogame industry. A keen photographer, Martin shoots on film and digital; he blogs here, and tweets here.













Shooting Challenge #12 - The Winner Is...
Curiosity Snaps Its First Self-Portrait On Mars
Now this challenge is a bit more like it (better than the last two), I shall enjoy coming up with some weird images. The closest I’ve done to this was for the Stairs challenge with this image: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/30637678/2012-11-08%2012.00.10.png
Question: I know your breif states that minimal post processing should be used, but what if we want to get a bit more creative? Or should our creativity be constrained to what we can achieve with our cameras?
I’m determined to get in a film entry this time, and I think I know what I’m going to do.
Your creativity should definitely come from what you see through the viewfinder and not what you do in the proverbial darkroom
Excellent. Sounds good to me.
Do we get any example shots from your lovely self? Maybe you should enter the competition for once, or would you embarrass us
That’s my shadow at the top
He cant hardly enter a competition he sets now can he!!
He can enter, just as long as he doesn’t pick himself to win.
I have run I have run your proposal by the Board, and the general consensus is that, yes, you are in fact correct, he can enter as long as he doesn’t pick himself to win, well spotted, sorry i dropped the ball!
Sweet Hairy Jeebus Martin, why? Why would you want to do that to a guy huh?
I found that Madonna Shot and all i’ll say is that what is seen, cannot be unseen!
It’s art, dear boy!
Thats as maybe, but by that very definition i dont have to like it, and I dont!
Just as you are free to dislike anything that’s furry and growls at you!
You got me thinking of Loraine Kelly on Bo Selecta now!
I can’t decide if that’s better or worse than Madge….
Agreed, i cant honestly decide either.
Does it HAVE to be a shadow, or can it simply be a self-portrait (but still holding the camera that is taking the photo of yourself)
Hell no, shadows were only part of Friedlander’s photo set. He also shot reflections and full portraits of himself using his camera’s timer. Some good examples from the book can be seen here: http://reading-light.blogspot.co.uk/2009/04/lee-friedlander-self-portrait.html
I like this challenge. BEst one for a while. I have a question. If I set up a tripod and put the camer aon a timer are photos like this allowed?
http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000etsyyTvymJY/s/860/860/portrait-of-a-handsome-man-on-the-street-in-New-York-City.jpg
Also are you allowed to photoshop?
Whoops I just seen the bit about minimal processing.
Selfies shot on a tripod with a timer are acceptable; but the example image wouldn’t make the cut – it doesn’t fit the brief (in the style of Friedlander’s work).
Well, I’m in!