Last year Sony kept finding itself behind the curve with Android phones. The new Xperia Z and ZL are the company’s attempt to break that trend. These two phones basically check off every box a spec-hungry geek could want and then some.
It’s hard to say which of these phones is the flagship since their similarities vastly outweigh their differences. Both have 5-inch 1920×1080 (aka 1080p) screens built on the Mobile Bravia Engine 2. Both have 1.5GHz quad-core Snapdragon S4 Pro processors and 2GB of RAM. Both have 16GB of built-in storage with microSD card slots so you can expand at will. Both run Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) with Sony’s more scaled-back Experience Flow UI. And both have 13MP cameras that use Sony’s new Exmor RS image sensor, which is not only built for low-light, but it’s the first chip that can shoot 1080p HDR video. All drool-worthy specs.
Both also have NFC and will work with various Wi-Fi direct devices (they couldn’t say it’s Miracast yet because certification is pending, but that’s what it is). That means you’ll be able to push video and music to Wi-Fi enabled TVs, stereos, etc. They also both have a very slick feature called Battery Stamina Mode. Essentially, when your screen is off, it turns off the stream of data your phone pulls down. But say you still wanted to get data email, or Google Voice notifications, or Facebook. You can white-list those apps so data still comes through for them. It’s a really clever solution which Sony claims will extend standby time up to 400 per cent. Both are currently slated to come with a pair of Sony earbuds that feature improved drivers, but various carriers may elect to go a cheaper route.
Now let’s talk about the differences.
The Xperia Z (top image and above) is the thinner of the two phones at just 0.31 inches (versus 0.39 inches for the ZL). There are no curves to speak of. It’s a 3D rectangle with hard lines. There isn’t even a hump for the 13MP camera. Literally every side of it is covered in a glassy surface with a plastic coating for added strength. Yes, it’s a fingerprint magnet, but it has one very impressive trick: it’s waterproof to three feet for up to 30 minutes. That means you could drop it in the toilet, take a shower, blow-dry your hair, and brush your teeth before you realize it’s in there and it’d still be fine. And the touchscreen works when wet (but not while under water). The Xperia Z packs in a 2330 mAh battery, which, combined with the Stamina Mode, will probably do quite well by you.
The Xperia ZL may be 0.08 inches thicker than the Z, but despite having the same-sized screen, it actually has a smaller footprint (5.19 x 2.75 inches vs. 5.47 x 2.80 inches on the Z). That’s because there is virtually no bezel at all—the front is basically all screen. That gives it a really nice look. The back is a curved, matte plastic similar to the HTC One or Droid DNA. Unfortunately the XL is not waterproof, but it does gain two other features we love. 1. It has a physical camera button, which we wish every phone had, and 2. It has an IR blaster, so you can use your phone as a universal remote for your home entertainment center. It might sound weird, but there are some terrific apps that take advantage of that technology, and we wish more devices had it. The ZL also has a slightly larger battery at 2370mAh.
Playing with the two phones, the experience was essentially the same. They are fast. I didn’t see any lag or stutter at all. The overhauled camera app is terrific. Sony basically borrowed it from some of its touchscreen cameras, it was very intuitive and fluid. You can shoot 10fps bursts for as long as you want until you run out of memory then pick the best shot, and while there wasn’t enough backlighting to give it a good test, the HDR video looked good at first glance. Sony really scaled back the way their UI looks, letting Android Jelly Bean do the heavy-lifting, and that’s a good thing. At the same time they’ve added some nice features, like more intuitive homescreen customisation and the aforementioned Stamina Mode. The screens are extremely sharp (440 PPI) and colours looked good, though blacks did turn a bit grey when the brightness was cranked all the way up.
In short, these are the best phones Sony has ever made, by a huge margin, and they look like credible contenders for the “Best Smartphone” crown. They will both be launching globally in Q1 of 2013 (“Probably March,” we were told). No word yet on pricing or when exactly we’ll see these two drop.
We also got to see a cool little accessory, which is currently known as the SBH 20. It’s a little square with play/pause, volume up/down, track search buttons, a headphone slot, and a clip. At first glace you’d think that it’s a cheap MP3 player, but it’s actually a tiny Bluetooth receiver. It has an NFC chip in it that pairs it to your phone with a quick tap. You can then have your phone in a bag or pocket and stream music to it, listening via the SBH’s headphone jack. Why is that cool? Because most headphones with volume up/down and track forward/back are designed to work with iOS, not Android. If you’re out for a run with these, it gives you a quick way to adjust your music (or answer calls) without having to pull out your phone. They’ll also be out in Q1 and will probably sell for around £30.
So a very solid showing from Sony Mobile. It seems like the company learned from past mistakes and has redoubled its efforts. We’re really looking forward to giving all of these items a full review in the months to come. More photos below. [Sony Mobile]
























Why Sony's Xperia Z is a Hard Nut to Crack
Finally, a Quad Core Innovation That's Worth Getting Excited About
Simply Share Video on the Big Screen With the Xperia Z Magic
Looks great! I’d go for the Z safe in the knowledge I could text while having a wee
Not being able to make comments on sponsored posts is annoying me so I’m going to have to post here instead.
The phone looks awful and the camera interface looks exactly like the iPhone one. But Sony never could design a phone so this really isn’t news to anyone.
Really? I was just thinking the Z looked like an Android phone that would actually tempt me away from the iPhone. Decent battery life (allegedly anyway) and a lot more robust. Just a bit large.
Android people, seriously, could you please do a 4 – 4.5″ phone with kick arse specs otherwise!?! Some of us want an Android choice which is a good phone but don’t want it to be massive.
looking at the video this phone did look fairly massive maybe the guy holding it just had tiny hands. However I can’t understand why there aren’t more people like you. Those who want the open lovely android without having to wall mount the device to use it.
I blame Giz UK commenters for moaning about the sponsored articles, now we can’t comment on them. I thought it was great that the Giz UK staff gave us that liberty before but I suppose it was abused.
You’re right on both counts.
Looks promising, maybe Google could look to Sony for the next Nexus – If they offered these phones with similar subsidies to the Nexus 4 that would be something special especially the waterproof model.
Deal breakers:
* On screen buttons – they use up screen estate (plus the status bar on top) which makes the usable screen less than 5 inches
* Non removable battery – with today’s standard of android games and 1080p video streaming, 2370 mah will not suffice even with ‘stamina mode’
Almost there Sony, but not quite.
Thinking about it, these are exactly the same problems the I phone has.
On-screen buttons aren’t a deal breaker. If the phone didn’t have on screen buttons then the screen would have been shrunk to accommodate the buttons. They give consistency in Android phones since they’re all in the same place, and they hide whenever you watch a video. Also if you decide to go for a custom ROM like CM or AOKP then you can customise that bar and hide them whenever you want. If anything they’re more of a benefit.
The way HTC do buttons is just wrong. They have back, home and recent apps as capacitive buttons, then if an app needs the menu button, the bar will appear at the bottom of the screen with just the “3 dots” menu button. It just looks horrible.
‘If the phone didn’t have on screen buttons then the screen would have been shrunk to accommodate the buttons.’
Looking at my Samsung Galaxy Note and other Samsung Galaxy phones, the buttons are below the screen. The Sony phone has on screen buttons plus bezel below it that could be used for capacitive buttons.
‘They give consistency in Android phones since they’re all in the same place, and they hide whenever you watch a video.’
Capacitive buttons below the screen IS consistent. Based on my experience, on screen buttons don’t always hide. Instead they turn into dots which still use up the screen and makes the video/app smaller than what it could be without the on screen buttons.
Looking at the pictures of the phones there’s no way you could keep the same size screen and bezel of the phone and also add in capacitive buttons, it just wouldn’t fit!
They’re not consistent because different manufacturers use different icons for their buttons and put them in different places. Based on my 5 months experience with my Galaxy Nexus, if the buttons can be hidden, they will hide. Some apps won’t hide the buttons because to show the buttons again you tap the screen, and if the app you’re using requires you to be constantly tapping the screen, there’s no point in hiding the buttons.