I didn’t know Aaron Swartz personally. We never spoke, not in person nor by email.
Yet, his suicide over the weekend has left a big hole in the world for me. I found my own sadness baffling. I didn’t know the guy. Why did I, deep down, feel such a void in the world? The reason was: I felt a rare connection to Aaron because of his thoughts and actions. An invisible connection that only existed at the intellectual level, not a social one, through his writing, technology, politics, and his willingness to show humanness.
Aaron Swartz’s tragic death didn’t only affect those who knew him personal, but also all of us familiar with his activist efforts and work at large. Mark Bao explores his own reaction to Swartz’s untimely departure.
His writing and thoughts connected with me, especially his Raw Nerve series on how to become better at being human. His writing showed me that other people were thinking about the same things I was, in terms of the “backstory” of being human, the inner. I felt like I was on the same wavelength with another human that was thinking and devoting time to these inner pursuits.
His code and contributions to software were inspiring, in Python, RSS, and elsewhere. Relentlessly making progress and thinking about the macro game of software and technology. Same wavelength.
His JSTOR incident? Not exactly the same wavelength. But fighting for progressive policies in government, liberating information in science and law, using the closer-to-democracy tool of the Internet to do that? Absolutely.
His writings on depression showed that, like all of us, he was human, and, like all of us, he suffered. But few of us show vulnerability and humanity. Many of us hide behind facades of “how are you?” “great!”, smiling photos, and upbeat Facebook statuses, preferring not to talk about what really goes on inside our heads.
Here’s a guy who I felt a deep connection to, because we were on the same wavelength – through openly showing humanity, a devotion to improving oneself, using technology for change, and changing the macro political environment. There aren’t a lot of people that I feel a multi-faceted intellectual connection with, but Aaron was one of them.
And despite not knowing him at all, his death left me feeling a void in the world. Because the world lost a brilliant person, but also because the world lost someone whose ideas I believed so much in, whose ability to put those thoughts into action was admirable, whose willingness to show vulnerability and humanness was something I feel like the world desperately needs more of.
But good often comes from bad. And the good, in this case, is the realisation that we should aim to connect with more people, on a deeper wavelength. We should all be working relentlessly to put our feelings into words and into action, and not be afraid to show that, yes, we are actually human, and yes, we do have things we really believe in but haven’t yet acted upon, and we do have moments where we feel on top of the world and also the moments where we feel absolutely hopeless.
And we should all be working to make the most of our time in the world, to make sure we don’t squander our most limited resource, and instead maximise it, to connect to and affect more lives in this world.
We might not all be socially connected, but the work that we do connects us as a community. And our collective work makes history.
Thanks, Aaron.
Image by Peretz Partensky/Flickr
Mark Bao is a 20-year-old startup founder, currently traveling the world and working on software that helps people build habits. He writes about life, behavioural science, philosophy, design, and other topics pertaining to technology, the brain, and humanity on his blog.













Academics Are Tweeting Out PDFs of Journal Articles in Memory of Aaron Swartz
Finally Someone Stepped Up and Designed A Way To Not Lose MagSafe Adapters
Memory Foam: Everything There Is to Know About NASA's Butt Protector
“A hero is born among a hundred, a wise man is found among a thousand, but an accomplished one might not be found even among a hundred thousand men.”
It’s always sad when someone thinks their only option is suicide but his death is no more meaningful or sad than anyone else I didn’t know and this ‘collective grief’ as seen when Princess Diana died (on a larger scale) is a weird phenomena that seems to be (to me) a reflection of modern society’s increased interest in celebrity.
And if he was just a homeless guy on the street you couldn’t care less
as i pointed out on the other post, I feel this is all pretentious bullshit.
woo bloody woo, all aboard the last train to hipsterville, have your tickets at the ready.
When a homeless guy dies on the street, we should take that as a sign that there is something is wrong in society. And guess what? Sometimes people do (google Totness and homeless death and you might see). When someone is hounded by law enforcement in suicide, that again is a call to action. And guess what? Some people are taking action. You may not care, but some people do. Unlike you (apparently) they are prepared to invest time in political action to try to make the world less bad. Maybe – maybe – you don’t have an obligation to join in, but pissing all over people who are trying to help is pretty low.
Biker has a point.
Its like clicking like on Facebook for what ever cause is big right now. You know the person feels good about them self.
But really its just lazy and not helpfull.
Remember that stupid kony campaign and the smelly hipster activists
I am not sure but I think you misinderstood his point.
Couple of points:
1) The news also widely reported that the homeless guy had been offered accommodation on several occasions but refused it, choosing instead to stay on the street. There are very few (if any) instances where someone ‘has’ to sleep on the street; choices are made, maybe poor choices because of mental health issues, alcoholism or some other ‘issues’ but short of locking people up against their will there are people who will be on the street.
2) It’s sad this guy died by his own hand but the authorities had a duty to investigate and prosecute and it’s not their fault if his mental well-being wasn’t able to cope. Are the law enforcement agencies supposed to decide whether to investigate and possibly prosecute on a “do we think the person will get sad, depressed, kill themselves if we take this further?”.
If I get a Dr’s note saying that I’ve stated several times that if I was ever locked up in prison I’d probably commit suicide then should that be considered a “Get out of Jail Free” card.
Society can not work like that. Like I say, I’m sad he took his life but there were other options.
They didn’t have to prosecutors, the copyright holders had dropped the charges but the US government decided to continue charging him.
JT, travel a bit: you’ll find that people sleep on the street much more in this country than in some others. So don’t tell me that there’s nothing we can do about it. Yes, people make choices, but they make them in circumstances they don’t choose. Sometimes, there are no good options to choose, because of those circumstances (one reason people sleep on the street is that the homeless shelters are often bad options. Bedbugs and lice are the least of the problems. The risk that your stuff will be stolen is a bigger one. The knowledge that the guy in the next bed may be an unmedicated paranoid shizophrenic who will set the place on fire is bigger still).
As to AS, you appear not to know the facts of the case. Why do the authorities have a duty to prosecute? A circuit court ruled on just this question: the justices said that in these cases, remedy was best left to civil suit, not criminal action. And guess what? The ‘victim’ did not press suit; rather JSTOR said that the prosecution violated proportionality. AS was threatened with 30 years imprisonment, for an offense that merited, at most, a $5000 fine.
There is no way to make society perfect, but that’s not an excuse for making it better. Don’t tell me that the US can’t be improved!
I’ve travelled extensively and lived in various countries including the US, Russia, Africa and around Europe and I can say that are ‘homeless’ have (by my understanding) the most options (both through charities and state) than almost anywhere else in the world.
Of course there could be improvements but you could say that about anything.
As to AS, I’m not as well versed in the details of the case but if there was already legal wrangling over the validity of prosecution etc then even less reason really to commit suicide. There’s been many cases of people locked up for decades for crimes they didn’t commit, only to be released under DNA review or a deathbed confession by someone else and the innocent party didn’t kill themselves, which leads me back to my original point about mental stability etc.
JT, it is true that some other people wouldn’t have cracked under the pressure. Not seeing how that makes applying the pressure okay. In actual fact, there is a legal principle here: you take your vicim as you find them. If I punch you and you die, it is no excuse that my punch wouldn’t have killed a more robust person (google the eggshell skull case for references).
I agree to a point but a more valid legal point is that you can’t not prosecute (criminal or civil) just because you don’t think the person can’t handle it either….it’s upto a court, jury or whatever is relevant to decide the outcome upon the evidence provided.
its not the action they are taking, and the loss of any life is sad. its the self centred pretentious bullshit which people spout and feed off, that results in the death of anyone in the public spotlight that bites me.
all the people who feed and leech off the sad death of another person, and i bet the majority of the people are not doing it out of some personal emotional need to fight for whatever the person who has died was fighting for, but peer pressure and expected reactions is what is behind this.
if not, then were was everyone one before?
the only difference is his death (but then his death is no more important than anyone else’s)
the above topic reads exactly how all the other article are written when someone who has been in the public spotlight dies.
the person writing has no connection whatsoever with the person
the person writing now has a hole in their life (which will be gone when its no longer a popular subject)
the person writing has a ‘Unique’ connection with the person, which obviously no other person could have
the person writing conveys all brightness and light about the dead peson (whether they were a complete asshole or not)
the person writing has a call to arms, we must fight this blah blah blah.
now don’t get me wrong people fighting to help make the world a better place is a good thing. its the hypocrisy of fighting for a cause you suddenly believe enough in to do something about it, only comes about because a person has died.
and its not like the people who truly support this can say, well we didn’t know it was happening, because if his cause is that dear to those people, then they would have already fighting for the injustices as they would have been well aware of what was going on.
i am not saying everyone falls into this as i bet there were people already taking action to help him, and kudos to those that were. its the fake social outrage (or grief) i cant stand.
“(but then his death is no more important than anyone else’s)”
Incorrect he was a clever person who contributed a lot towards society, his death is more important then some other deaths due to the fact that his life was more valuable then some other peoples.
have to disagree with you there, so he is clever, so what, why should that make his life more important than anyone else’s, and if you want to see it like that, he certainly wasn’t clever enough to end up in the position he found himself prior to his death
You’re treading a very thin line when you start ranking a persons life. Value is relative and for me Aaron life would probably rank low on the scale however my friends would rank high but in world terms they probably wouldn’t rank particularly high.
Maybe we can agree on some things. I might be reading different people to you. The people I’m reading – on blogs concerned with making information more widely available – were talking about this case long before AS took his life. Many of the writers knew him personally. They are people who have been supporting legal action, and academic boycotts, aimed at changing the rapacious publishers. So maybe you’re excluding these people, And maybe the people you’re worried about really exist.
its the knee jerk reaction people i am on about, not those already fighting for his cause
I agree in some ways with you but in other ways I completely disagree, sometimes a death can be a catalyst for change and different perspective. Should I be chastised for discovering his cause after his death, it doesn’t make my fight any less valid.
the fight no,
but the whole its a sad loss, he was a great man blah blah blah, when they didn’t know him
the point i am making is that those who do it because of peer pressure and fake sentiment then yes
“Nobody panics when things go “according to plan.” Even if the plan is horrifying”
I feel this is one of those cases where this quote applies
i couldn’t remember where that was from, so had to google it, then kicked myself hard, as i should have known
I had to look it up (after your comment) imagining it was from Patton or Churchill.
I now want to kick you because you kicked yourself for not knowing a quote from a Batman movie….I had thought you were higher up the Jeremy Kyle scale than that… honestly
Not just any batman film, the best batman film lol
You’re only making it worse!
tum tee tum tee tum
I’m kinda surprised more people don’t end up committing suicide when facing prison. Life seems shit enough without having to be locked up for a long time