There is a disturbing trend in the gadget world, and it’s that laptop, tablet and phone makers aren’t taking battery life seriously enough. Yes, having touch on a Windows 8 notebook is great, but not if the computer lasts an hour and a half less than one without that capability. And what good is a smartphone with an HD display and superfast processor if you have to plug it in around lunchtime?
We run our homemade battery test, which involves continuous Web surfing at 40 percent brightness, on every device we review. And if the endurance isn’t good enough, regardless of the gadget’s other features, we simply won’t recommend it.
Here are seven of my worst battery life offenders and how much you’ll pay per hour of juice versus more efficient competitors.
Staying on the cutting edge of gadget tech doesn’t come without a few sacrifices—both monetarily and in terms of battery life. And what good is an HD display if you can’t even use it? Laptop Mag’s Mark Spoonauer breaks down the worst drainers in detail.
Battery Life: 4:37
Cost Per Hour of Juice: £150 per hour
You know it’s a bad sign when the top tech story in Google News is that you might be offering an external battery for your product. Despite its Core i5 power and the ability to run both desktop and Windows Store apps, we don’t recommend the Surface Pro because its 4 hours and 37 minutes of battery life completely undermines its portability. The average ultraportable laptop lasts about an hour and a half longer. And while the iPad isn’t as versatile, it lasted 12 hours and 22 minutes on our battery test. That’s 2.5X the endurance.
Battery Life: 4:24
Cost Per Hour of Juice: £45 per hour
Lets take a look at two Chromebooks with around the same price: the Samsung Series 3 Chromebook (£229) and Acer C7 (£199). Both devices sport 11-inch displays, but the ARM-powered Chromebook lasted 7:34, while the C7 lagged more than 3 hours behind at 4:24. Granted, the C7 isn’t designed to be your primary PC, and maybe you will use it mostly around the house. But why would you pay £45 per hour of battery life for the Acer when, for just £30 more, you can get the much more efficient Samsung Chromebook? The Series 3 also happens to sport a sleeker design.
Battery Life: 4:37
Cost Per Hour of Juice: £220 per hour
One of the most innovative Windows 8 hybrids of the year is also one of the most disappointing. Almost everyone who sees the ASUS Taichi, which has a second screen on the back of its lid, can’t help but say, “Wow.” All you have to do to transform this 11.6-inch wonder from clamshell to tablet mode is shut the lid.
While we wish both displays offered touch capability (just the outside one does), my biggest complaint is the lack of staying power. In laptop mode, the device lasted 4 hours and 37 minutes, and with just the touchscreen active, we saw only 3:37. The average ultraportable laptop lasts 1.5 hours longer. While it’s bigger, the £879 twelve-inch Dell XPS Duo lasted 5:46, translating to a much better efficiency rating of £160 per hour.
Battery Life: 4:36
Cost Per Hour of Juice: £55
If you want a pure Google experience, the unlocked Nexus 4 is the smartphone to buy. You get the latest Android 4.2 Jelly Bean software, a nifty Photo Sphere camera and absolutely no ugly skins. Too bad the 2100 mAh battery inside this handset lasted only 4 hours and 36 minutes on our battery test. Even when you consider the bargain-basement price of £239, you’ll still have to deal with a device that lasts 1.5 hours less than the average Android phone.
Battery Life (Rated): Up to 4:15
Cost Per Hour of Juice: £70 per hour
We give HP credit for being transparent about the battery life it expects out of its Pavilion Chromebook. The company says “up to” 4 hours and 15 minutes via the 4-cell battery. Even if the system lives up to that not-so-lofty number, it will lag way behind the Samsung Chromebook’s score of 7:34. Granted, HP’s Chromebook has a much larger, 14-inch display, but it also costs £70 more for something you can’t use for very long away from an outlet.
Put another way, you’ll pay £70 per hour of endurance, versus £30 per hour for the Samsung. That’s nearly a 2.5x premium.
Battery Life: 3:37
Cost Per Hour of Juice: £37 per hour
You might have heard of the Kurio 7 tablet, because it’s targeted directly to families. This £130, Android-powered device lets you create multiple child profiles with ease, as well as restrict screen time and Web surfing. Parents can also choose to whitelist only the apps they want Junior to use. But what good is a kids’ tablet if it runs out of gas in just 3 hours and 37 minutes? That works out to £37 per hour. The £160 Amazon Kindle Fire HD lasted 7:34, and it has a parent-friendly FreeTime mode.
Battery Life: 4:36
Cost Per Hour of Juice: £185 per hour
Here’s a twist on the Windows 8 convertible you should probably avoid. The 12.5-inch ThinkPad Twist combines a swiveling touchscre£en with one of the better keyboards you’ll find. We especially like the stand mode for giving presentations. Just make sure you’re near an outlet. On our battery test, the Twist died after 4 hours and 36 minutes. The average ultraportable notebook lasts 6:01. Although it has a slightly larger display, Lenovo’s own IdeaPad Yoga lasted a much longer 6:18. In efficiency terms, the £850 Twist would cost you £185 per hour of juice, compared to far less for a cheaper Yoga outfitted with a much faster 128GB SSD. That’s an easy call in my book.
Republished with permission from Laptop Mag. Laptopmag.combrings you in-depth reviews of the hottest mobile products, the latest tech news, helpful how-to advice, and expert analysis of the latest tech trends.




















The Google Nexus 7 Is the Worst Gadget To Unbox, Ever—Watch Why
3M's Silicon Anodes Could Boost Gadget Battery Life by 40 Per Cent
Is This the Worst Gadget of the Year So Far?
Suspicious absence of Apple products in this article.
Which would you suggest, out of interest?
iPhone 5, some of their other portables too? Just seems odd to see an article like this that’s entirely aimed at Windows and Android based products.
While their phones aren’t great for battery life, all the other products are, there was only one phone included and that, for obvious reasons has a worse battery life than the iPhone 5.
But isn’t this article about power to price ratio? Still suspicious by their absence.
You take these articles way too personally, just because they’re not bashing an Apple product you think they’re wrong? I’ve used Windows, Mac, Android and iOS, the battery life I’ve got from my iOS devices and my Mac massively outperforms my Nexus and expensive Sony laptop. This article may be right, I’m sure they would have considered iOS devices.
You missed the point. Don’t take it personally at all, just pointing out the elephant in the room. Chill.
Haha, I’m sorry I didn’t sound chilled, I am. I just think they would have tested Apple products too in their test as they use them and they’re quite popular along with the other devices tested.
iPhone 5. I love mine, but I’d happily have had a phone a few mm thicker if I could get a bit longer out of it…
any iPhone!
I noticed the macbook pro has been slashed (being the operative word) in price in anther Giz article.
So assume it has a (I must estimate here, because I can’t find a figure anywhere on t’internet) 5 hour life and the price of an mid line laptop is £1,249 (per fruit store) then you’re looking at £250/hr.
Ouch.
My Air and my old Pro both lasts comfortably beyond the 6hr mark, I’ve never timed it, but I have forgotten to plug them in on many occasions when I get to work and they’ve gone through most of the business day. My iPhone 5 is ok for battery, nothing amazing but certainly not bad. My Nexus 7 is poor whereas my ipad is pretty amazing tbh (in sleep mode it loses hardly any battery). I don’t think anyone is being biased, in my opinion Apple products have good battery life (apart from the odd bug *cough* 4S). But then there are loads of exceptional Windows and Android devices that are better for battery life than Apple products…just my opinion…
In fairness this isn’t a Giz article, it’s been reposted from Laptop Mag. I’d like to think that any half decent tech site / blog would give a more rounded and comparative view of the industry if they’re going to go out and bash any particular companies, especially considering the less techie readers may take these types of articles at face value and it may persuade buying choices. It isn’t just suspicious that there aren’t any Apple comparable figures shown, it’s just downright bad journalism, if you can call it that – rather than sensationalism. I’m kind of shocked that Giz have reposted this without some input and balancing it out. Shame on you.
I’ve taken the liberty to work out some of the other devices I feel should have been included to give a FULL and unbiased view of devices on the market today.
I’ve used companies own publicised ‘up to’ battery figures so obviously mileage may vary depending on personal usage and I’ve rounded to the nearest whole number(not even sure the article above contains any caveats but it should).
Apple iPad 32GB Wifi – £48 per hour
Microsoft Surface RT 32GB – £50 per hour
Google Nexus 4 16GB – £64 per hour
Apple iPhone 5 16GB – £66 per hour
Apple iPhone 5 32GB – £75 per hour (for comparison)
Nokia Lumia 920 32GB – £48 per hour
Blackberry Z10 16GB – £43 per hour
Google Nexus 7 16GB – £20 per hour
Google Nexus 7 32GB – £25 per hour
Apple iPad Mini 16GB – £27 per hour
Apple iPad Mini 32GB – £35 per hour (What?!)
Amazon Kindle HD 16GB – £15 per hour
Amazon Kindle HD 32GB – £19 per hour
Google Nexus 10 16GB – £36 per hour
Apple iPad 16GB – £40 per hour
Apple Macbook Air 128GB – £186 per hour (!)
I’d like to have included the Samsung Galaxy S3 and Tab but a quick look on Samsung’s site has revealed no battery usage guide that I can see. But there are many other devices I haven’t included, I just went for the obvious ones that came to mind. I’ve used sim free prices and like I said, ‘up to’ figures which tend to mean very little in real life.
Looking at the results I can make several observations.
First of all – Apple are ripping everyone off on flash storage markup.
Secondly – It’s apparent that battery technology needs to advance and quickly. Our devices are becoming more powerful and we are demanding longer run times between charges. Unless that issue is addressed it looks like battery capacity will be the Achilles heel in tech advancement.
Thirdly – Dividing a devices battery life into cost per hour is absolutely ridiculous and serves no purpose whatsoever and should never have been posted on Gizmodo unless someone was going to fill in the blanks and do some reporting.
Fourthly – You can’t just compare devices by battery life alone. The Surface Pro has writing support, proper gaming capability, full USB for instance. That’s why it’s direct competitor is the Macbook Air as opposed to the iPad. Also the Google Nexus 10 has an INSANE screen resolution which requires way more power to drive than any other mainstream tablet. A side-by-side comparison of an iPad seemed to show the Nexus 10 being slightly brighter as well so you could dial that down and save more juice that way.
Fifthly – Battery life is highly subjective. I DO NOT get anywhere near the 8 hours Apple claims on my iPhone. Unless it’s in my pocket for those 8 hours or I switch off a ton of features that I bought the phone for in the first place. In contrast, my iPad 2 lasts way more than 10 hours of just solid browsing (with GPS and 3G switched off).
Sixthly – This has been a complete waste of time. There are a bazillion places to charge your phone and dozens of battery cases, portable battery packs and other sources of power if you need to top your device up and you aren’t at home/work/friends/Starbucks.
Nothing I’ve seen here would dissuade me from purchasing any one of these products. They are all at the top of their respective categories and each have their own appeal.
Battery capacity sucks. It doesn’t matter which company you buy it from.
Try my solution for Nexus 4, while at work switch MOBILE network on only while using, rest of the time just keep mobile connection switched off, sorted.
Kinda defeats the object of having a phone if you have to switch it off to make sure the battery lasts!
No, because I still can get text and voice calls
I did mention at work didn’t I.
Yeah, you can use automation apps to switch wifi and mobile data on or off at certain locations and that does help battery life. However, I can’t say that I’ve ever had a battery problem with my Nexus 4. I charge it every night and around 30% usually remains by the next night.
Still waiting on that wireless charger, though.
Yes same here, I keep it connected to charge all day at work and at home some days I use it from 7 till midnight non-stop. It does go from from 100 to 5% though, I play games a lot on it.
Rooting and sticking CM10.1 seems to have masively helped my battery life, if you’re willing to give it a go.
Just to play devils advocate for a moment, it DESTROYED my battery. Down to about 3-4 hours of screen on use.
Really?
My train journey home is about 35-40 minutes. I regularly use up to 40% of my battery during it! Its on constantly, web, IM, occasionally media etc so it’s heavy use but still…
Having said that, I wouldn’t go back to stock! But then I’m not using a Nexus 4 so this is all almost totally irrelevant anyway.
Custom ROMs let you control the CPU clock speed and there are some CPU profile optimisers out there, bet you can find them easily. I use out my battery from 100 to 5% between 5 hours of constant use, mainly G+ Twitter HD Games etc.
According to my battery monitor, the drain comes almost entirely from the screen, rather than the CPU. But hey, every little helps, maybe I’ll give it a go.
True, display takes the biggest chunk out. CPU reduced speed and wifi/mobile network off only comes handy when phone screen is locked.
Aye, I’ve heard the same but not brave enough to do it yet. May be after a year when I’m emotionally a bit less attached to it
Now you’re just teasing me
https://twitter.com/GizmodoUK/status/301746072127164416
Ah, if only I tweeted
I’ll look forward to Fridays
Try turning off the NFC. And the data automatically shuts off when connected to wifi anyway.
Yep, NFC is always off, I don’t use it, not yet.
My Nexus 4 got about 20 – 30% of its battery back each day once I completely switched off Google Now.
Also keep a power toggle app on the main screen, I don’t need mobile data at home, I have wifi, and I don’t need wifi at work I don’t have access to a connection. It now means I have around 20% of battery left at the end of my day, rather than ARGHHHH WHERE’S MY CABLE at 3pm at work.
Yep, I’m doing the same manual override. This one is quite handy
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.j4velin.notificationToggle&hl=en
I’ve got a Nexus 4 never considered the battery to be an issue, I charge it every day and a half (sometimes at work, sometimes at home) and use the WIFI whilst at work, I don’t run it ragged but I rarely find my battery life to be an issue compared to other phones
Yes I’m also pretty much on WiFi zone most of the time and a total control freak when it comes down to mobile data usage, have both reminder and cap on
How about the Sony Vaio Series E laptops? Aren’t they notorious for their battery life? Around 3.5 hours for a £800+ device. I think that should make it on to the list.
I just bought this device
You might be being a bit harsh on the N4 there. Mine easily lasts a day which is ok by me. Phones work without the screen being on, ie they can recieve calls etc. But laptops are useless without a screen. They are kind 2 different catagories.
Why are you marking down Hybrid laptops (the surface pro included) for having 4 hours of battery life? That’s a perfectly respectable time for a laptop. The phone and the true tablet yeah thats pretty bad but they cant run anywhere near as many programs as the hybrids can
Why are you marking down Hybrid laptops (the surface pro included) for having 4 hours of battery life? That’s a perfectly respectable time for a laptop. The phone and the true tablet yeah thats pretty bad but they cant run anywhere near as many programs as the hybrids can
sorry put that in the wrong place
If the device has a removable battery I let it off, sadly they’re all ditching that.
True. I miss the replaceable batteries. Almost like changing mag in a gun. Well that’s how I like to remember them anyway.
It seems that I am the only person with a good nexus 4 battery life. Mine has been off charge for over 30 hours with use and its still above 40%
Do you just put it on the desk and stare at the glorious pitch black screen like?
Comparing the cost per hour could be relevant when comparing similar devices however comparing phones, tables and laptops using this method, I find bonkers.
A little bit of generalisation, I agree but they all are portable and battery powered fond slabs too. Make sense to me because we pay more for laptops so they should last longer with the bigger battery. It’s finding mean average by cost which tells us if they are worth it. Good idea in my view
The battery life on my Nexus 4 seems good to me. It rarely goes below 60% battery if I’ve been using it to listen to music all days at work and just generally using it as a phone.
If I play games it does dip towards 20% towards the end of the day, but I’ve only had to charge it during the day once.
Try Indestructible
4-PLAYER REAL-TIME MULTIPLAYER ACTION!
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.glu.indestructible&hl=en
Are you saying that Indestructible hammers the battery? It looks like a pretty good game though! Is it a bit like Mashed, and is there a single player offline mode too?
I’ve been playing Dead Trigger, Temple Run 2 and using N64oid a lot. They all hammer the battery to a fair extent, but not as much as I thought they would.
Indestructible is one of the best games out there, multiplayer is awesome and only game size is only 100 mb
Installing now
I wish they had the option to colour vehicles and better matchmaking.
Only had a few quick battles last night, but it seemed unfair that I was pitched against guys in massive tanks with lasers, while I had no option but to use the default car with gattling gun.
The menu UI is also a bit confusing, as I didn’t find it obvious how to upgrade your weapons, for example, or how you go about acquiring weapons upgrades – Nothing is explained at all. It all looks very pretty though.
Aye, they need a lot of work and revamp for this game. If they made a paid version with all those fixed I would had gone for it and bought it!
Actually battle keep reminding me of Halo Wars!
Yes the battle rank is unfair but it fun too, I use to park on high grounds and wait for them to show up to fire and if they come close then start driving off to the repair drop zone lol
Weapons can be upgraded from the menu where you will see mini gun appearing at the garage. Take a bit time because they are not straight forward.
I play on Nexus 4 but if you’re playing it on a tablet that would be HOLY MOLY!
Found the best game on Android three days ago!!!!!!!
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.madfingergames.deadzone&hl=en