If I were Pluto, I would be really pissed off with the astronomers that just announced the tiniest planet ever discovered. It’s a new planetary system called Kepler-37, which is centred around a star similar to our sun about 210 light-years from Earth, in the constellation Lyra.
The planet, according to the observations of the Kepler telescope, “is slightly larger than our moon, measuring about one-third the size of Earth. It is smaller than Mercury.” Pluto, however, it’s smaller than our moon, prompting its expulsion from the list of planets in our solar system in August 24, 2006.
The discovery has been a big challenge, according to NASA’s Kepler mission scientists. The detection of this tiny planet shows that they are capable of much more than they initially thought. Initially, the first exo-planets discovered were giants but, as they refined the technology and research process, they have been able to detect smaller and smaller planets. Kepler-37b — as this tiny planet is named — is now the pinnacle of this quest to detect tiny planets.
According to the astronomers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, “while the star in Kepler-37 may be similar to our sun, the system appears quite unlike the solar system in which we live.”
Astronomers think Kepler-37b does not have an atmosphere and cannot support life as we know it. The tiny planet almost certainly is rocky in composition. Kepler-37c, the closer neighboring planet, is slightly smaller than Venus, measuring almost three-quarters the size of Earth. Kepler-37d, the farther planet, is twice the size of Earth.
But there’s more to this discovery than just a quest to search smaller planetary bodies. Jack Lissauer — planetary scientist at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California — say that Kepler-37d “suggests such little planets are common, and more planetary wonders await as we continue to gather and analyze additional data.” Thomas Barclay — lead author of the study and Kepler scientist at the Bay Area Environmental Research Institute in Sonoma, California — agrees:
We uncovered a planet smaller than any in our solar system orbiting one of the few stars that is both bright and quiet, where signal detection was possible. This discovery shows close-in planets can be smaller, as well as much larger, than planets orbiting our sun.
Great news, people. But Pluto is still crying in a corner. [NASA via Popular Science]













Is Pluto a Planet or Not?
Astronomers Discover a Planet Made Of Water
Astronomers Discover Habitable Earth-Like Planet Very Near Us
While I like to think I understand a decent amount of the science involved in this it still boggles my mind that this can be detected over the distance involved.
There must be a star map some where *scratches his head*
I thought part of the problem with pluton planet status (or lack of) was its orbit not just its size?
Pluto’s dammit, pluto’s. not pluton.
I prefer Pluton…. ! lets go there!
Spot on.
If we call Pluto a planet then we’re going to run into a lot of problems later on as we discover more and more Kuiper belt objects. A conservative estimate puts them in excess of 100,000. Bugger for future schoolkids; “How many planets in out solar system?…and name them.”
It took long enough to get Pluto properly classified, it’s not a planet within the strict definition that makes sense.
Our propensity to neatly “package” items will cause a similar problem with Saturn’s rings. We like to label them as A-G with approx a dozen clear gaps. Cassini probe is already showing many of the the edges merge together. Perhaps they’ll be re-classified as ‘regions’ rather than rings?
No, it’s because they descovered Eris and so had to reclasify what Pluto was.
http://youtu.be/Z_2gbGXzFbs