37 
Because every single person on the Internet decided to force induce viralness by not really doing the Harlem Shake while making those ridiculous Harlem Shake videos, it’s time to kill this meme with a “Harlem Shake” video that no one can ever top: Porn Stars doing a naked “Harlem Shake”. Yep, naked.
It was part of Woodrocket’s Memes I’d Like to F*ck series and if you want to see the uncensored NSFW version, it’s right here. The video stars Karmen Karma, Brandi Belle, Nina Dove, Peru, Alex Chance, Cameron Canada, Staci Silverstone, Ashli Orion, and WoodRocket’s own Seth’s Beard as the Pizza Delivery Guy.
Okay, Internet. No more Harlem Shake videos. It’s done. No one can top this. You’d be a fool to try. [Woodrocket via Animal NY]
Officially NSFW: YouTube's Naked Lady Problem (NSFW)
Google Is Blocking Porn (Duh, NSFW)
There Is Such Thing As a Flipboard for Porn and It's Called Faploid (NSFW)
WOW did not expect topless… yasssss
Naked slutty sluts….
The front of my jeans just tightened up.
I thought these posts were reserved for the likes of Fleshbot.com, clearly not!
Zzz
the fuck? Z- list p-stars? MINGING!
Porn Stars, hookers with teeth.
Oh lordy…
I’ve gone blind…
I remember when gizmodo used to update us with gadgets and technology. How about you leave these type of videos for porn websites ?
I remember those days too. But Gizmodo slipped into the depths of sleaze and trash a long time ago. It’s also written mainly by a bunch of illiterate kids.
So, why do you continue to come back here, open the articles and comment on them?
If it’s so terrible, there’s the X button in the top corner, just click it and leave.
Because bashing such wtf posts on giz unite us all into g+!
I’m sorry for you. You don’t seem to understand how progress works. When something we used to enjoy and appreciate starts to degrade, some of us comment on it in the hope that if enough people do so, the people responsible will improve it and turn it back into the thing we once loved. It’s called being proactive and giving a damn. You will never make much of your life if you simply take the “this isn’t very good anymore so
i’m going to leave” approach instead of thinking “how can I improve this?”
Hey Klinkenberg, like I said to another commenter on this thread, we’ve always covered internet memes, and have never been afraid to edge towards the smutty end. Since pretty much day one, so I’m slightly puzzled by your comment.
I know Giz has always dabbled in smut. But in recent years it has been on the rise. I’m not the only person here to think that Giz would be better with less porn, less foul language and more use of the spell check.
While I agree with you on the spell check (I’m pretty vigilant, but I can’t possibly read 40+ posts each day, plus do the rest of my workload), I’m actually pretty happy with what you call the rise in smut — evidently, so are other readers, as traffic indicates people are interested. We still only post what we view as being within the Gizmodo world, but evidently you don’t seem to think this site is living up to what it once was, so I’m not quite sure what to suggest, other than what you yourself decried.
Because things won’t change unless feedback is provided, genius.
Yup – I commented on this a week or two ago. Can anyone at Giz please explain why you are now directly linking to porn sites? I generally love visiting this site but it is becoming increasingly embarrasing opening what should be a tech website, when my wife and young children are in the room.
Hey Fuser, like I explained to another commenter, we’ve always posted about internet memes, and always been a more…risque site. Anyone familiar with Giz knows that if you work in a particularly conventional office, for example, it might be safer to browse the site at home / in privacy.
Grow the fuck up. We don’t live in America where we pussy foot around ‘sensitive’ issues to protect people’s delicate sensibilities. If it’s really so embarrassing, don’t click the link, it clearly states NSFW. There is no way to accidentally expose anyone, who doesn’t want to watch this, to it. You don’t have to like every post, that’s fine, but don’t impose your conservative ideas on the rest of us. I watched this video without getting the least bit aroused, there is no fucking and it’s clearly not meant to be sexual (for example, there is no foreplay or actual sex going on, fucktard). It’s a joke, grow up.
That was @ klinkenberg, sorry fuser.
Sort your life out, fucktard.
There, I stooped to your level. Happy now? Now go back to playing with yourself whilst you wish your life was better.
Your language says it all. Filthy people love filth. I bet you watch porn almost every day and have a boring (or more likely entirely lacking) sex life.
Side note: I love how your definition of “anything sexual” has to include foreplay and/or actual intercourse. So Playboy magazine is not remotely sexual? Not the brightest little star in the sky, are we. Aww bless.
I don’t really see how your retort actually addresses any of the points I made in my comment. As far as I can see, rather than refute the statements I’ve made, the only response you’ve actually made is to draw an irrelevant comparison between the video above with photographs in a pornographic magazine that is sold for the purpose of their customers arousal. The video above, while showing naked women, is not designed to sexually excite but rather to entertain. Your inability to distinguish between the two is exactly what has caused your excessive and inappropriate emotional response.
Furthermore, judging somebody as a ‘filthy’ person because they’ve decided to use ‘filthy’ language as an intensifier only further proves your close-minded thinking. Somebody intelligent (yes, gasp, I am actually not a mental reprobate) is allowed to say the word ‘fucktard’ as an insult, fucktard. You know why they’re allowed? Because this a free world, where people are entitled to freedom of speech. And no, don’t go off on a pseudo-intellectual rant about encroaching on YOUR freedom of speech, because your initial comment was designed to impose your own lack of liberalism on the rest of us. This is called a logical fallacy.
Aww bless. You tried so hard to impress. Sadly, you appear to be trapped inside the belief that if you sit by a thesaurus for long enough, and try ever so hard to sound intelligent, you might win a pointless argument with a stranger on the internet. It’s ok, we all feel the need to prove to ourselves, from time to time, that we’re special. You’re special too, Theory. Hugs.
Unfortunately for you it will take one hell of an effort to prove that when a group of professional porn stars dance naked, in a video, and release it to the public, it is not intended as anything remotely sexual, whatsoever. Best of luck with that.
PS – I loved this part “Somebody intelligent is allowed to say the word fucktard as an insult, fucktard”
Allowed by what, the governing body responsible for regulating the use of the word fucktard?
Poor, sad little man. Hugs. xox.
Clearly we just have different view points about the world. I apologies for getting so worked up about it, I shouldn’t have had such a strong emotional reaction. I think issues pertaining to sexuality, particularly those about gender divides, are inevitably going to cause emotionally charged discussions. I accept your point that this video does depict images of a sexual nature, I just disagree that it’s intent was to cause arousal. I don’t see this as a harmful video.
We live in a world now where access to information, of any nature, is considerably easier. Rather than try and reduce our societies exposure to these ‘harmful’ mediums, we should encourage a less restrictive and reductive approach towards building society. These are just women, like any others, and they’ve been paid extremely handsomely for their job. Just because they’re selling flesh, not loans, it doesn’t make them any less moral. We do not need a taboo to surround nakedness.
For the record I have never used a thesaurus. My point, really, was that you shouldn’t cast aspersions about others peoples’ intellects when you actually have no idea how intelligent they are, or what background they come from. I would like to stop this needless, patronising back and forth we’ve got going now. We have both made our points, I think, not everyone will agree with each other.
Sorry, typo – that should say apologise
We’ve always covered internet memes. And we’ve never been a straight-laced tech site.
Out of all harlem shake videos, must this one stand out and be posted here ?
From the first paragraph: “Because every single person on the Internet decided to force induce viralness by not really doing the Harlem Shake while making those ridiculous Harlem Shake videos, it’s time to kill this meme with a “Harlem Shake” video that no one can ever top: Porn Stars doing a naked “Harlem Shake”.”
how/why is this tech? I’m confused gizmodo why you’re posting this.
Its been stated many times before – Giz is a tech based site but comments on anything it finds interesting.
Its all in their mission statement somewhere.
touché
Internet memes; we blog a lot of ‘em.
Made my day
thanks Giz 
Their parents must be so proud.
wow, gangnam style has changed A LOT. I definitely prefer this version
A like the small blondie. She looks so slutty and sexy when the other girl slaps her ass with the pizza box…
Oh look, I’m pitching a tent.
I know you say this is the definitive version. But the memes not dead until someone makes a star trek version.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37p7X8Y7GBY&feature=youtu.be
Okay, meme over now.