The Samsung Galaxy S IV will be announced at an event on March 14th in New York. It’s so close we can almost feel it in our hands. And thanks to the leaky ship that is the internet, we’ve got a pretty good idea of what to expect once it’s real.
Last year’s Galaxy S III wasn’t just a great Android phone—it was a blockbuster. Ten months is enough for any device to lose some of its shine, but when it was released it was the most hotly anticipated Android phone ever made, and it’s since moved some 40 million units. The Galaxy S IV is going to need a monster overhaul both inside and out if it wants to play leapfrog again.
Samsung opted out of this week’s Mobile World Congress to make its Galaxy IV impression, opting instead to invite the entire known universe to a March 14th blowout announcement all its own. Mark your calendars in ink.
After the phone’s finally official, expect a UK on-sale date around two months later, which puts the street date in May or June.
We have no reason to think the new flagship won’t be called the Galaxy S IV (S 4?), though it might lead to a little confusion. The Qualcomm processor in the GSIII is called the Snapdragon S4, Apple’s flagship a few years ago was the iPhone 4s, and Google’s current Android envoy is the Nexus 4. All those similar names start to blend together, huh? No matter. If Apple can call every big tablet an iPad, Samsung can keep its numerical progression.
The Galaxy S III’s polycarbonate plastic body (below) has the distinct advantage that you can drop it a million times without destroying it. But man, no matter what colour you paint it, the hardware is intensely ugly compared to the iPhone or HTC’s shiny new One.
Last year, you could get away with functionality alone, but in 2013, the once-dopey Android market is full of handsome handsets. Notably, the HTC One just shed its plastic shell for a Jony Ive-style block of aluminium.
Information on the GS IV’s design is thin. The just-announced Galaxy Note 8.0 has the same plastic build as the GS III, so it may make sense that Samsung keeps consistent across the whole product line. Let’s hope not, though.
If you’re into highly unsubstantiated rumors based on photographs of printed pictures, here’s how one supposed leaked press image has it:
Here are another batch of supposed leaks shots that appears to have a 1920 x 1080 display and a physical home button.
And the same source that released the images was kind enough to put out a videoas well.
Then again, plenty of folks are confident that the Galaxy S IV will have a (here non-existent) home button. Safe to say the jury’s still out, but it will definitely be a rectangle that makes phone calls.
Everyone seems to think the GS IV is going to be bigger than its predecessor. Rumours originally pegged it for a 5-inch, 1920 x 1080 AMOLED, 440 PPI display, compared to the 4.7-inch touchscreen on the GSIII. More recent reports indicate, though, that Samsung has had to ditch the AMOLED in favor of Full-HD SoLux display.
Screen quality is a core selling point right now, and Samsung must be feeling the pressure to increase screen resolution and pixel density from its competitors. Apple has been unrelentingly touting its “retina” displays, and the new HTC One’s 4.7-inch, 1920 x 1080, 468 PPI display puts the 310 PPI screen on the GSIII to shame.
As for the bigger display, it’s in keeping with Samsung’s tendency towards industry-leading size, not to mention that the company has previously indicated plans for a 5-inch Full HD screen in the product roadmaps it flaunts at trade shows.
By now the Galaxy S III’s camera is unacceptably bad by flagship phone standards. Camera performance has become increasingly important, and companies like Nokia—with its excellent PureView processing technology—and HTC—home of the UltraPixel—stealing the limelight from previous leaders.
A few rumours and some supposedly leaked images over at Androsym say that Samsung will outfit the GS IV with a 13-megapixel camera. That also happens to be the same resolution as Sony’s latest 1/3-inch Exmor RS image sensor. If this is the case, the company will probably roll out some kind of visible (if not necessarily effective) new processing tech.
Even though Samsung doesn’t really have a reason to gamble on the S IV, the company been investing heavily in imaging technology over the last few years. And last fall that tech started landing in its mobile devices. The Android-enabled Galaxy Camera released last fall was run by the company’s mobile team—even though the 24x zoom lens and 16-megapixel 1/2.3-inch image sensor was ripped directly from an existing digital imaging product. Otherwise, from its screen to its guts, the Galaxy Camera was basically a GS III. In other words, Samsung already installed a larger 1/2.3-inch camera on a Galaxy S phone. There’s no reason it couldn’t ditch the 24x lens that made the Galaxy Camera bulky and put that larger sensor on GSIV.
In December, Samsung’s digital imaging team told Gizmodo that it was very serious about the potential of products like the Galaxy Camera—and that there would be news on that front “soon”. It’s reasonable to think that soon is now.
A larger battery—something in the 2600 mAh range—seems to be a no-brainer. The 2100 mAh battery on the GS III is painfully inconvenient. Indeed, every large, LTE Android phone is suffering growing pains because these phones just can’t make it through the day. A bigger, higher-resolution screen on the GSIV would only exacerbate the issue. Don’t expect anything massive like the monster 3300 mAh Motorola Droid Razr Maxx’s, but an upgrade to a 2300mAh battery—which serves the HTC One well—would be the minimum, and realistically, it’ll need something much larger to keep from frustrating the hell out of customers.
Wireless charging has also become more commonplace on new top-end phones; it would be somewhat disappointing if it the new GSIV didn’t have it.
It seems almost a lock that the GSIV will launch with Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean); other Samsung products are already up to speed with the latest and greatest, so the flagship will be as well. Key Lime Pie won’t be official until Google I/O in May, and it’s likely Google will reserve at launch for its next Nexus device.

It won’t be pure Android, though, because of course not. Samsung’s TouchWiz UI will return to the GSIV with an update and probably some nifty new features. There’s a rumour that Samsung is building an app called “Samsung Orb” to take 360-degree panoramas, which seems at this point like an obvious win.
The Samsung Galaxy S IV may also add touchless gestures. This rumor cropped up in early February and we’re only mentioning it because Samsung has already implemented the tech in other products. Samsung SmartTVs, for instance, already have motion cameras that let you control menus on board. Many Samsung cameras also support a few gestures already, including zoom and shutter release. It seems likely enough that you’ll see the same on the GSIV.
Another similar rumour that has been suggested by a number of sources including the New York Times is that the GSIV will have “touchless scrolling”. The idea is that the phone will gaze deeply into your eyes so it can tell when you’ve reached the end of a particular block of text or a part of the screen and automatically move down to the next. Bloomberg reports that the eye scrolling feature might not show up until later iterations of the GS-line, however, the GSIV may have some eye-tracking features like the ability to pause video when you look away. This video appears to show off that feature:
As with the GSIII, there will be two versions of the phone for LTE and non-LTE markets. In the UK, the 1.7 GHz, quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 used on the HTC ONE is a good bet because of its integrated LTE.
In international markets without LTE, the current wishful-thinking rumor is that the GSIV will run the crazy 8-core Exynos 5 Octa chipset that Samsung announced back at CES. That would be way, way more power than processors on other flagship currently on the market. Probably more than the GS IV needs. Because of that, we might see the less-ambitious Exynos 4 Quad instead.
As for other internals, Samsung probably doesn’t need to bump the GSIII’s existing specs much. You don’t need much more than 2GB of RAM these days. Besides the obvious 32GB and 64GB of storage, there could be 128 GB version as well.
There’s also a rumour that different regions will get versions with different internals — a supposedly benchmarked UK version of the GS IV confirms the above rumours, with a few local specialities.
The GS IV probably won’t evolve much in this area except for the possible addition of wireless charging. The phone will almost certainly launch on all the major networks, with support for EE’s 4G out of the box and other networks’ 4G further down the line. There should be Bluetooth and NFC onboard as well, potentially with some cheeky pairing and sync features. Wi-Fi, duh.
This article was originally published on the 1st of March 2013.
To get on-the-spot news, app tips and the full lowdown on Samsung’s latest mobile announcements check out Samsung’s Your Mobile Life over here.


















Amazon Kindle Rumour Roundup: Everything We Think We Know (Updated)
iPad Mini Rumour Roundup: Everything We Think We Know
Apple's Next iPhone: The Complete Rumour Roundup
Why not 5000 mAh instead?
Whatever you do, Samsung, please remove that damn plastic!
Agree with every cell in my body.
am i the only one who prefers plastics to aluminium and metals that scratch dent peel etc..
I really do not care what a phone looks like, i just want it not to break, scratch, dent or peel when i drop it, and i will drop it (A Lot)
I much prefer the plastic – it’s by far the best material for such a device – malleable, non-conductive, cheap to manufacture and repair, and damage resistant. Fashionistas be damned – I’ll take practicality as long as it’s not obviously ugly (and there’s no reason plastic has to be ugly).
I prefer the plastic too. Lord knows how many times I have dropped mine and it is perfectly fine.
Also I have it in Amber-Brown and it looks gorgeous.
I totally agree with you. I don’t see steel as “premium” or “modern”. It actually makes me fell “what the hell? are we still on the 50′s?”. It is expensive and it has very little resilience against scratches. It looks shiny of course, but for me it also looks outdated.
Agree with regards to improving sales, and the device does look terrible.
Problem is, for personal use, I much prefer a device that doesn’t break.
It’s the same Catch-22 as batteries – I’d much prefer a huge battery, but it seems like mot people would rather have thin, sexy devices.
The plastic is fine if it means I can get the back off to replace the battery.
Aluminium bricks look better but replaceable batteries are de rigueur for me.
Having abused my S3 since June (when the blue one finally arrived!) the finish is exactly the same as when I got it. The same can’t be said for the metal-framed SII, which is paint-chipped, scratched, dented after a similar period.
As it’s also not textured plastic, it’s not worn down over time where it’s been regularly held, so the phone still feels the same as the day I got it.
I got an S3 a couple of weeks ago, to replace my BlackBerry Z10 which went back.
The phone is great, but the plastic back is not fit for purpose. It is extremely smooth and the phone can easily slip out of your hand. A very bad design.
I have been through 3 cases to find one which was not too bulky and had a rubberised / matte finish. Got a Seidio in the end.
I sometimes wonder about companies like Samsung, where they develop a £500 product and then just skimp on the quality of the materials for no good reason. Its probably a few pence to make a better back yet they choose to make one of such bad quality.
The Z10 has a rubberised back, the Google Nexus has rubberised sides.
+1 to plastic. I use a phone case (yeah I know, but I sell my gadgets to buy new ones) so metal does not do anything to me. It’s lighter, cheaper, and durable. I think they just have to design it better to make it look more premium and quit using white as a poster colour.
I got the grey 4G version and bought a drilled aluminium case from ebay, plastic no more. Worth pointing out it is polycarbonate not plastic.
Sure, plastic/polycarbonate (whatever it actually is), may be great, but the one on the S3 doesn’t feel as premium as the device. The phone feels like it could slip at any time. Couldn’t they use the space-plastic in the style that HTC used for the One X variants? Space-Plastic is cool.
I could not agree more ! There is noway i would but money down for a high end device thats made with cheap looking plastic. No matter how great the device is if it is high end then it should actually feel high end.
Skinz cost less than $1. A case, which most people seem to opt for is what $20? Polycarbonite is amazing stuff gives on impact. It saddens me that people worry about how others perceive them based on what their phone looks like. FFS grow up.
As for battery life on the S3, I cant fault mine. If it does get drained it takes me 5 seconds to replace the battery and I’m good for another 15/18 hours.
So you have no TV, monitor, dashboard, keyboard, cameras, …….I could go on all night.
Apple thought glass was a smart idea – that went well didn’t it?
LOL
Another plastic fan here! So much more practical and longer lasting compared to aluminium/glass. In regards to form factor and ugliness, I think it is pretty subjective, but I don’t think the SGS3 looks any worse than the iPhone 5, which both seem abnormal to me.
My personal favourite form factor/look has to be the SGS2.
I much prefer the plastic too. Doesn’t break when you drop it, and if it gets scratched up too bad, its cheap to replace.
well my round up
(ohh my god I may be lynched now)
it will have
phones
internets
screens
battery
and the ungodly overlay know as touchwiz
it wil also have
Mails
Maps
textingness
Porn
and the ability to automatically piss apple fanboys off
you won’t get lynched by me, i wanted a note 2 but hate touchqiz so much i couldnt do it
Note 2 + Apex launcher = bye bye TouchWiz!
i know what you mean but !!!!!
Stock
Phone App
People App
Messaging App
If I cannot have these beautiful beautiful things (which i cant unless I root and stick a rom on it) then I won’t play ball
I had it for 2 days and sent it back to amazon
Must say though battery life is superb compared to my nexus 4
Have a look on XDA you can install the stock apps without a new rom.
Am I the only person who likes touchwiz?
I find it much better than the stock android.
I don’t mind it at all apart from the icon design – I like the stock look.
Totally not buying until root is available. Oh, and when I stop being poor.
according to a poster here, i am too poor to play games
How often does an Android phone come out these days that has not been rooted before it his retail, especially a popular handset like this one.
Never. I don’t understand what your point is. I’ve said in numerous posts that I disagree with the way that Samsung started using proprietary drivers in the S3, so whereas with my HTC Desire and Desire Z, and LG Optimus One, I took the risk, and bought the phones before root, on the basis that there would be a root available, I’m not willing to take that risk with the S4, because my S3 has a severe lack of AOSP ROMs due to these proprietary drivers.
I’m running CM10 on my S3 4G – looks to be plenty of NexusROMs for the mainstream S3.
No, there aren’t. There are no official CM10 stable releases for the International S3. Only 2 stable AOSP ROMs have been released for the S3.
My point was you said “Totally not buying until root is available” so I was saying, basically that even if you bought on day one root would be available.
Oh, I’m with you – they had some real issues with the S3 AOSP ROMs, so I wouldn’t touch it until those ROMs came out for the S4. Sorry for getting lairy at you for the wrong thing all together!
IT’s OK, I’m getting quite used to people getting lairy at me for the wrong reasons. Hence I’m only returning here to respond to comments, rather than make new ones.
Actually, I didn’t even know you were Darrell when I made that comment! I don’t know why people seem to be cross with you all of a sudden, just that there seem to be many politiks going on.
Things are as they are. It appears my particular blend of wit, sarcasm, slapstick humour and wind up’s has fallen from grace. Best to just leave it a while methinks. Lot’s going on elsewhere so it might actually be a good thing.
I hope you’re well, then. Take care, mate.
Really? Who the hell doesn’t like your particular blend of wit, sarcasm, slapstick humour and wind up’s?
The emmc bug my SIII currently has? (dormantly lying in wait…)
The white SII echo issue that even T-Mobile ‘experts’ couldn’t sort out? (But I did – a piece of bloody cardboard… ‘experts’ spelt morons)
These two issues aside, I’d still buy another Samsung phone over a fruity phone any day. Hell, I’d go back to my old Nokia if fruit phones were my only option…
I just wish for once mobile makers would bite the bullet, make it a smidgen wider than usual and stick a bigger battery in there.
Honestly, for the sake of a couple of mm you could ramp up the battery life no end.
Or possibly make it thicker… But no wait, that would be an abysmal move because if its over 9mm its ugly and too thick..
I won’t be buying it, despite my current phone being the S3 – and that’s solely because the almighty Samsung still won’t release their damned source codes for the Exynos processor. Compare this to Sony, who actually released the code for the Xperia Z *before* the phone was released, thus opening up endless possibilities for the devs.
Fuck you, Samsung. I’m not buying your gear ever again.
Read my comment above – completely agree with you!
I agree with this philosophy. Also I’ve had a lot of software issues with my S3 which I’ve had to fix myself by rooting. Things that their software updates have fucked up.
So, I’m not keen at this moment (although ultimately I buy the best phone on the market regardless of brand or ROM when I decide it’s time, and that may well be Samsung)
“Notably, the HTC One just shed its plastic shell for a Jony Ive-style block of aluminium.”
Exactly which plastic shell is this guy talking about? My HTC one s doesn’t have a plastic shell. Nor does the one x. Does he just presume anything that isn’t an iPhone has a plastic shell?
Yes it does. The HTC One X is made of polycarbonate, aka plastic.
Which just goes to show how great plastic is.
Are you retarded? So what is your One S made of?
Aluminum, you stupid fuck.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_One_S
They are going to have to do better than this to make me upgrade my S3. CM10.1 runs well, it has QI charging and I don’t have to look at the plastic with a Rock case.
Rock cases are polycarbonate – So is the S3.
Yes, but it looks nice
Saying it’s intensely ugly compared to the iphone is subjective. I remember people saying the Iphone 4 design was ugly before it came out.
In my opinion, the S3 and Iphone are “intensely ugly” compared to Sony phones.
Sony phones? LOL
Indeed.
I find it quite interesting that with 2 weeks to go to launch, we are pretty much in the dark about this phone, whereas at the same time at iPhone launch we had a full photo leak of pretty much every part of it! The Samsung Security Militia are clearly a more potent force than the wee security guard at the Foxconn building.
I got my star! Woohooooo!
Pardon my noob-ness, oh great host of the star; but how do I change my picture on here?
I have no idea. When you find out can you let me know?
Just found out. You need to sign up for Gravatar with the email you used to create your account, add an image and as if by magic it shall appear.
Thanks for that info! Just signed up and uploaded a pic. And now the wait begins…
WOOHOO IT HAS BEEN LINKED!!!
Sounds more and more like iPhone, minor improvements from here on in, nothing revolutionary. Luminia and BB10 will be making inroads if this is the case.
It’s difficult to say when all this article is is rumours and maybes.
Sales figures still completely disagree with you…
I think the S3 is better looking than the iPhone4/5. I don’t like the iPhone ‘square slab’ look, whereas the taper on the S3 to a millimetre all round is just beautiful. Makes it look much thinner than it is. And the iPhone seems to be more bezel than screen on the front, whereas the S3 doesn’t (I know it’s not, I just don’t like the way it looks).
I’d personally ditch the 4G version for a DCHSPA+ version if it had the Exynos 5 in it. Not bothered about 4G, it wont be widespread for years anyways and currently it’s no faster in download speed to DCHSPA+ and whocares about upload speed.
The guy who wrote this should seriously revisit engadgets’ own original SIII review. Here’s some selected point and counterpoint from it
(http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/25/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-review/)
“But man, no matter what colour you paint it, the hardware is intensely ugly compared to the iPhone or HTC’s shiny new One.”
vs.
“In any case, once you get past that “oh, it’s another Samsung” vibe, you realize that the GS III’s design tradition is — in many respects — no bad thing. Minimal bulk with no frills is what Galaxy phones are all about, and seeing as this particular model lugs a 4.8-inch panel it’s only right that Samsung’s designers used all their old tricks to keep the weight and dimensions to a minimum.”
“The 2100 mAh battery on the GS III is painfully inconvenient.”
vs.
“The GS III is also just 8.6mm (0.34 inches) thick, which is only marginally fatter than its predecessor and still well below the average smartphone belt buckle, despite the inclusion of a hefty 2,100mAh interchangeable battery…..We can’t move without acknowledging that performance has a flip-side: battery drain. We had high hopes for the GS III in this regard, after we saw it had an unusually high-capacity 2,100mAh battery, and after GSMArena found in their own tests that the handset can go for almost as a long as a tablet. Fortunately, we can corroborate those results. ”
Some teensy bouts of, er, totally overhyped hypocrisy in there, I think. Did Samsung marketing commission that piece, by any chance ?
No it’s just that the tech world are retarded when it comes to these things.
The S3 still has great battery life, one year on. All reviews originally praised battery life.
ITT, Samsung fanboys doing everything to back their boring ugly phone up..
It’s impossible for the A15 chip to be put in the GS4 sadly, it draws too much power…
Alright spec, but I hope to god they get some style in the case and its not as plastic as a Tupperware Box
Poor effort in terms of design, looks pretty much the same as the much prefer the design of the new Sony handsets, even the new blackberry cool. Samsung never were good at designing, same old plastic tat.
Galaxy S IV? More like Galaxy S IIIs amirite?