Remember when 3D television sets first hit the shops? They all cost about ten gasquilion quids and the glasses cost as much again and you had to get a permit from the council because of the carbon monoxide that they gave off and you could only switch them on for three hours a day? About two years ago wasn't it? Read More >>
Featured comment by hughes82:
"yeh i agree its only £200 but you will get a crappy 3d picture
whe comes to electrials what you get is what you pay for
pay cheap get cheap and..." More »
When it comes to glasses-free 3D TVs, we've had the bar set really quite high by the amazing Lumabox, and to be honest, Panasonic's latest offering is just pants compared to it. Read More >>
Featured comment by JulianT:
"Personally I'd rather that the whole 3D TV idea went away and they concentrated on large flat screen 'wall' TV's (think about the big screen in the ap..." More »
If you're lucky enough to get a pair of 3D glasses with your fancy new 3D TV, chances are good that they're hideous. So this year, I decided to scour CES for 3D specs that weren't embarrassingly awful. And I found them, in a place I never would have expected. Read More >>
Featured comment by Magic Robot:
"Wow - you have an Optoma 3D Projector AND a front garden? You must be a gazzilonaire.
I'm so skint, even my dreams are in 2 dimensions." More »
13 
