<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo UK &#187; cartoon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/tag/cartoon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:12:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Memes Would Have Spread Across the Universe</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/05/how-memes-would-have-spread-across-the-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/05/how-memes-would-have-spread-across-the-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=165942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/18nq7rj9dtlnmjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18nq7rj9dtlnmjpg" title="18nq7rj9dtlnmjpg" />Information can only travel so fast—but even if it can travel at the speed of light, there would be a natural delay before memes could traverse the entire universe. So where across our neighbouring star systems might some of our favourite pop culture references have ended up by now? Fortunately, that&#8217;s exactly what today&#8217;s XKCD [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/05/how-memes-would-have-spread-across-the-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, You&#8217;re Not Random</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/05/no-youre-not-random/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/05/no-youre-not-random/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=164724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/18n86zyiwymw6jpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18n86zyiwymw6jpg" title="18n86zyiwymw6jpg" />Because actually, being genuinely random is incredibly difficult. You&#8217;re just talking crap, instead. [XKCD]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/05/no-youre-not-random/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Long Should You Spend on Making Tasks More Efficient?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/how-long-should-you-spend-on-making-tasks-more-efficient-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/how-long-should-you-spend-on-making-tasks-more-efficient-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifehacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time saving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=161715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/18m3t2mdaahfopng.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18m3t2mdaahfopng" title="18m3t2mdaahfopng" />These days everyone wants you to hack your life in order to make your day-to-day existence more efficient. But there are times when the effort&#8217;s not really worth it — and this chart should help you work out what to spend time on, and what to ignore. Put together by XKCD&#8217;s Randall Munroe, this chart [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/how-long-should-you-spend-on-making-tasks-more-efficient-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Instruction Manual For Your Shared Office Printer</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/the-real-instruction-manual-for-your-shared-office-printer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/the-real-instruction-manual-for-your-shared-office-printer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phd comics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=160984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/18lpw95ojpay6png.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18lpw95ojpay6png" title="18lpw95ojpay6png" />Working in an office with other people is fraught with all kinds of tensions and politics*, but there is nothing more divisive than the humble shared printer. Here&#8217;s the instruction manual they forgot to include in the box that behemoth of a color laser arrived in. [PHD Comics] * Or so I&#8217;m told. I work [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/the-real-instruction-manual-for-your-shared-office-printer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Time Travel Is Confusing</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/why-time-travel-is-confusing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/why-time-travel-is-confusing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=160632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/18llkf90x1d46png.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18llkf90x1d46png" title="18llkf90x1d46png" />Actually, time travel is confusing on many levels—what the hell did happen in Twelve Monkeys exactly?—but it&#8217;s the simple things that can cause the biggest headaches. Especially, as the mouse-over text in XKCD points out, the countdown: &#8220;T-minus 10&#8230; 11&#8230;&#8221;. [XKCD]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/04/why-time-travel-is-confusing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People Who Rescale Videos Without Thinking Need To Be Punished</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/03/people-who-rescale-videos-without-thinking-need-to-be-punished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/03/people-who-rescale-videos-without-thinking-need-to-be-punished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aspect ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[randall munroe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=151162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/18hund1z7mskcjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="I&#039;m always disappointed when &#039;Anamorphic Widescreen&#039; doesn&#039;t refer to a widescreen Animorphs movie." title="I&#039;m always disappointed when &#039;Anamorphic Widescreen&#039; doesn&#039;t refer to a widescreen Animorphs movie." />And, as Randall Munroe points out in today&#8217;s XKCD, this is how to do it. Maybe then they&#8217;ll understand why preserving aspect ratios is important. [XKCD]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/03/people-who-rescale-videos-without-thinking-need-to-be-punished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You&#8217;re Blaming Computer Problems on a Virus, You&#8217;re Probably Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/03/if-youre-blaming-computer-problems-on-a-virus-youre-probably-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/03/if-youre-blaming-computer-problems-on-a-virus-youre-probably-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=146985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/18g4kwd18wubajpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="Within five minutes of the Singularity appearing, somebody will suggest defragging it" title="Within five minutes of the Singularity appearing, somebody will suggest defragging it" />Next time a computer in your office is broken, chances are someone will blame it on a virus. But let&#8217;s face it, most computer problems don&#8217;t stem from viruses; they stem from dumb people. Of course, it&#8217;s easier to blame something than it is to understand a problem. That&#8217;s natural; we all look for scapegoats [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/03/if-youre-blaming-computer-problems-on-a-virus-youre-probably-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There Are Some Battles Bezos Can&#8217;t Win</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/01/there-are-some-battles-bezos-cant-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/01/there-are-some-battles-bezos-cant-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=138262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/18ckmgweq6g9xpng.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18ckmgweq6g9xpng" title="18ckmgweq6g9xpng" />Today&#8217;s XKCD puts the success of Amazon.com into some perspective. Because I can&#8217;t do any better than Randall Monroe&#8217;s hilarious alt text: &#8220;Amazon.com took a surprise early lead with &#8216;Time required to transport a package from Iquitos, Peru to Manaus, Brazil&#8217; but then lost it at &#8216;Minutes to skeletonize a cow&#8217;.&#8221; Time to pick up [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/01/there-are-some-battles-bezos-cant-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sometimes, Numbers Aren&#8217;t as Convincing as You&#8217;d Like</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/01/sometimes-numbers-arent-as-convincing-as-youd-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/01/sometimes-numbers-arent-as-convincing-as-youd-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=135726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/18bntwgtcol5ijpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18bntwgtcol5ijpg" title="18bntwgtcol5ijpg" />Turns out that a very small percentage of a very, very large number is still significant. Your hand sanitiser is only as good as the number of decimal points the nines stretch to. [XKCD]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/01/sometimes-numbers-arent-as-convincing-as-youd-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Is Ruining Our Real Life Conversations</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/social-media-is-ruining-our-real-life-conversations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/social-media-is-ruining-our-real-life-conversations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=122249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/1861nwjyvz1ezjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="1861nwjyvz1ezjpg" title="1861nwjyvz1ezjpg" />If you use Twitter or Facebook or Instagram, everybody already knows everything there is to know about you. That sailing trip you took? Liked. Breaking up with your girlfriend? Replied to on Twitter. All these over-sharing, always-on social networks create situations where there&#8217;s nothing left to talk about! [Shoebox Blog via Neatorama]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/social-media-is-ruining-our-real-life-conversations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Describing Saturn 5 in Simple English Is Difficult But Hilarious</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/describing-saturn-5-in-simple-english-is-difficult-but-hilarious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/describing-saturn-5-in-simple-english-is-difficult-but-hilarious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=119507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/1852dquhzlp9dpng.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="1852dquhzlp9dpng" title="1852dquhzlp9dpng" />Describing any form of technology in simple English can sometimes be tricky. But try describing a space craft, and suddenly things get much, much harder. Today&#8217;s XKCD attempts to describe the construction of Saturn 5 using only the thousand most commonly used words in the English language. Take a read by clicking on the image [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/describing-saturn-5-in-simple-english-is-difficult-but-hilarious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What People in 1899 Thought the Year 2000 Would Look Like</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/09/what-people-in-1899-thought-the-year-2000-would-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/09/what-people-in-1899-thought-the-year-2000-would-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 06:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[past perfect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=99693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/17xpn1dc3xmkojpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17xpn1dc3xmkojpg" title="17xpn1dc3xmkojpg" />If you asked me back in the year 2000, what 2012 was going to be like, I&#8217;m not sure I could have gave you a good answer. So you could imagine how wrong people back in 1899 were about the year 2000. They thought there were going to be flying firemen! It&#8217;s funny to see [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/09/what-people-in-1899-thought-the-year-2000-would-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Internet and Modern Medicine Really Cost Us</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/08/what-the-internet-and-modern-medicine-really-cost-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/08/what-the-internet-and-modern-medicine-really-cost-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 21:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Liszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=91858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/17uu2kyo0jacojpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17uu2kyo0jacojpg" title="17uu2kyo0jacojpg" />So we may not have gotten the future we wanted with flying cars, robot butlers, and vacations on the moon. But we did end up with fantastic advances in science and modern medicine, and the internet. However, there was a catch. A very costly addition to the fine print that proves you don&#8217;t get something [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/08/what-the-internet-and-modern-medicine-really-cost-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Theatres Should Be Like This</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/movie-theatres-should-be-like-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/movie-theatres-should-be-like-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=82421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/17r6rjeoozl6ajpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17r6rjeoozl6ajpg" title="17r6rjeoozl6ajpg" />I love this movie theatre layout. It would be my favourite cinema ever. Wait, no. My favourite movie theatre would have seats that would open into a pit full of hungry Great White sharks in the case people talked out loud, texted or ate making annoying noises. Ooooooh yes, indeed. And then show footage of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/movie-theatres-should-be-like-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fascinating Quantum Theory of Pixels</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2011/12/the-fascinating-quantum-theory-of-pixels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2011/12/the-fascinating-quantum-theory-of-pixels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bouletcorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=27459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/medium_104f451ac2fdc7c7c0a7b222d0b04558.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="medium_104f451ac2fdc7c7c0a7b222d0b04558" title="medium_104f451ac2fdc7c7c0a7b222d0b04558" />Did you think that quantum physics is complicated? Try the <em>quantum theory of pixels</em>, as explained by 8-bit Professor Hawking.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2011/12/the-fascinating-quantum-theory-of-pixels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Behind the Next Apple iPhone 5 Event</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2011/10/whats-behind-the-next-apple-iphone-5-event/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2011/10/whats-behind-the-next-apple-iphone-5-event/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim cook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=5233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tim-cook-event1-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="tim-cook-event" title="tim-cook-event" />Although you can't clearly see Scott Forstall's deranged face on this drawing, everything in this graphic showing the mechanics of Apple's next iPhone event—starring Tim Cook as master of ceremonies—is true. [<a href="http://www.joyoftech.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1598.html">Joy of Tech</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2011/10/whats-behind-the-next-apple-iphone-5-event/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
