Despite carrying user-generated content, Wikipedia has often been criticised for being tough to edit - even by its co-founder Jimmy Wales. But researchers have found another way in which the Web 2.0 wonder might leave people gnashing their teeth: it's much harder to read than that old favourite of doorstep salesmen, Encyclopedia Britannica. Read More >>
Featured comment by otaviokz:
"I don't thing dumbing down is a good option for a knowledge repository. Maybe offering multiple versions of the articles on complex matters could be a..." More »
Wikipedia is a wonderful resource, the kind of website that makes you marvel at what the internet can achieve. But it's only as good as its contributors and, while some are extremely committed, the sad truth is that the project is running out of editors and new admins. Read More >>
Featured comment by yeoldgreat1:
"My friends managed to get Chimbledon (Children's Wimbledon) to stick in Wikipedia. I think they've had a bit of fortune that it's managed to go for s..." More »
37 
