Looks like Playboy's been a naughty bunny. Ofcom's fined the smut-peddlers for doing what they do best, all while not protecting the kids well enough. Apparently anyone could gob an eyeful of hardcore with a just few clicks, no credit card required. Read More >>
Nine months on from the Wall Street Journal spotting a massive Google privacy issue—namely, that it was circumventing cookie privacy settings in Safari—the search giant's fate is now sealed. A judge has approved the US FTC's largest ever fine, in the process rejecting appeals from a consumer-rights group that the sum should be higher, which means Google is set to pony up a cool $22.5 million -- around £14m. Read More >>
Featured comment by chootastic:
"Surely a more effective way of fining theses companies should be: Minimum fine + a % of gross income. That might actually have some impact." More »
Featured comment by Darrell Jones:
"Mformation had better hope the inevitable appeals don't take too long or they might end up with nothing. Also this seriously cuts the value of RIM to ..." More »
Every once in a blue moon, a story like this comes along and scares the bejesus out of every tube traveller, as we put our blind faith and safety into the hands of a group of select, almost-invisible individuals responsible for our travel. In this case, London Underground is set to get a massive fine for endangering lives after a driverless train ran through several stations and narrowly missed hitting a passenger train back in 2010. Read More >>
After hard drives containing sensitive patient data were sold-off on eBay, the NHS has a rather massive fine coming its way from the Information Commissioner's Office. Thing is, it wasn’t exactly the NHS’s fault. Read More >>
Featured comment by ThisIsNotAUsername:
"A fine is a little pointless as it won't modify their behaviour. Someone in management should have got sacked to reduce the chances of it happening ag..." More »
64 
