<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo UK &#187; processor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/tag/processor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supposed Galaxy S4 Spec List &#8220;Confirms&#8221; Eight-Core Processor</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/03/supposed-galaxy-s4-spec-list-confirms-eight-core-processor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/03/supposed-galaxy-s4-spec-list-confirms-eight-core-processor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Cutlack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy s4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giz uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=147388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/s4-specs-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="s4-specs" title="s4-specs" />Someone who appears to be in possession of a Galaxy S4 prototype decided it would be fun to stick a few benchmarking apps on it, giving us a look at how the phone performs and what might be inside Samsung&#8217;s next Android flagship. The Antutu benchmark test reports that the S4 is powered by Samsung&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/03/supposed-galaxy-s4-spec-list-confirms-eight-core-processor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World&#8217;s Smallest Arm Chip Is Going To Be Inside You</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/02/the-worlds-smallest-arm-chip-is-going-to-be-inside-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/02/the-worlds-smallest-arm-chip-is-going-to-be-inside-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=146374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/18fx15lwoi8khjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18fx15lwoi8khjpg" title="18fx15lwoi8khjpg" />Manufactured by Freescale, this chunk of silicon claims to be the world&#8217;s smallest ARM-powered chip. Measuring just 2 x 2 x 0.5 millimetres, it&#8217;s so small that it will likely end up inside&#8230; you. It packs a modest 48 MHz ARM Cortex-M0+ processor, paired with 32KB of flash memory and 4KB of RAM. That might [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/02/the-worlds-smallest-arm-chip-is-going-to-be-inside-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Launches Budget Ivy Bridge Processors</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/01/intel-launches-budget-ivy-bridge-processors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/01/intel-launches-budget-ivy-bridge-processors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celeron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=137237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/18c9l8q1mdzcsjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18c9l8q1mdzcsjpg" title="18c9l8q1mdzcsjpg" />Now that Intel has its efficient and expensive Ivy Bridge microarchitecture in tablets and computers everywhere, it&#8217;s decided to launch a budget-friendly line of processors which use the same 22nm manufacturing process. CPU World reports that Intel is launching three Celeron CPUs, four Pentiums and a new Core i3 processor, which should theoretically be available [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/01/intel-launches-budget-ivy-bridge-processors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Tells Apple To Take A (Price) Hike</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/samsung-tells-apple-to-take-a-price-hike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/samsung-tells-apple-to-take-a-price-hike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giz uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=119558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/shutterstock_824143211-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="shutterstock_82414321" title="shutterstock_82414321" />News from the front line of the Apple-Samsung war, and Samsung, fresh off the back of winning more money back from Apple in the UK, is sticking the knife in by jacking up processor prices for Apple by 20%. According to the WSJ, a person &#8220;familiar with negotiations&#8221; between the two behemoths suggested that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/11/samsung-tells-apple-to-take-a-price-hike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If These Benchmarks Are Genuine, the iPhone 5 Will Blow Literally Everything Out of the Water</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/09/if-these-benchmarks-are-genuine-the-iphone-5-will-blow-literally-everything-out-of-the-water/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/09/if-these-benchmarks-are-genuine-the-iphone-5-will-blow-literally-everything-out-of-the-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Gibbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iphone 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giz uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=103410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/iPhone-5-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="iPhone 5" title="iPhone 5" />The iPhone 5 is out in the wild, well, under NDA in the hands of reviewers at least, but it&#8217;s apparently made a quick appearance on Geekbench, just to test its mettle a little. It clocked up a score of 1,601, which totally annihilates the iPhone 4S with its puny 631 score, and even tops [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/09/if-these-benchmarks-are-genuine-the-iphone-5-will-blow-literally-everything-out-of-the-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>189</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s New A6 Chip Is Smaller, Lighter, and Mightier</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/09/apples-new-a6-chip-is-smaller-lighter-and-mightier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/09/apples-new-a6-chip-is-smaller-lighter-and-mightier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Wagner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=102237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/A6-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="A6" title="A6" />Apple announced it&#8217;s got a whole new chip for the iPhone 5. It&#8217;s called the A6, which is a semi-surprising upgrade to this year&#8217;s iPad&#8217;s A5X. No word on whether it&#8217;s quad core or not, but it&#8217;s 22 per cent smaller than the old A5 and has twice the GPU and graphics power. The A5 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/09/apples-new-a6-chip-is-smaller-lighter-and-mightier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung&#8217;s New Exynos Mobile Chip: USB 3.0 and 1080p Video at 60fps</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/08/samsungs-new-exynos-mobile-chip-usb-3-0-and-1080p-video-at-60fps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/08/samsungs-new-exynos-mobile-chip-usb-3-0-and-1080p-video-at-60fps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=93551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/17vikmarz42m1jpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17vikmarz42m1jpg" title="17vikmarz42m1jpg" />Samsung has released the specs of its new Exynos 5 Dual mobile chip, and it looks set to be an absolute powerhouse. An ARM-based 1.7 GHz mobile CPU, it seems set be a massive leap forward from the Exynos 4 Quad which currently powers the Galaxy S III . So, what can you expect to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/08/samsungs-new-exynos-mobile-chip-usb-3-0-and-1080p-video-at-60fps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Artificial Brain Loves to Watch Cat Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/googles-artificial-brain-loves-to-watch-cat-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/googles-artificial-brain-loves-to-watch-cat-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neural network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutterstock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=81300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/17qxvlvly4j05jpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17qxvlvly4j05jpg" title="17qxvlvly4j05jpg" />Hidden away within Google&#8217;s X laboratory, where all kinds of secret projects are underway, its engineers have been working on creating an artificial brain. With 16,000 computer processors and freedom to learn whatever it chooses from the internet, though, it turns out that the brain does just what you do online: watch cat videos. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/googles-artificial-brain-loves-to-watch-cat-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Intel Turbo Boost?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/what-is-intel-turbo-boost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/what-is-intel-turbo-boost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Biddle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[what is]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel turbo boost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivy-bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turbo boost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=76345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/IvyBridge-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="Ivy Bridge" title="Ivy Bridge" />Lots of exciting new computers! And no matter what, we still get jazzed about processor speeds. But what&#8217;s this Turbo Boost business Apple mentioned? Why do CPUs have two different speeds? It&#8217;s actually pretty simple. &#160; Turbo Boost makes your computer faster when it needs it&#8230; As the name implies, Turbo Boost is&#8230; turbo. Let&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/what-is-intel-turbo-boost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Multi-Core Processors a Waste of Time for Android?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/are-multi-core-processors-a-waste-of-time-for-android/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/are-multi-core-processors-a-waste-of-time-for-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=75796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/17pf7sdxzkxldjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17pf7sdxzkxldjpg" title="17pf7sdxzkxldjpg" />Many Android handsets feature incredible processing power these days, with multiple cores and high clock speeds seeming to offer incredibly smooth performance. According to Mike Bell, from Intel&#8217;s Mobile and Communications Group, though, the specs might not be as impressive as they first appear. Speaking with The Inquirer, Bell explains that Android software just isn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/06/are-multi-core-processors-a-waste-of-time-for-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Imperfect Processor Is 15 Times More Efficient Than Yours</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/05/this-imperfect-processor-is-15-times-more-efficient-than-yours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/05/this-imperfect-processor-is-15-times-more-efficient-than-yours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=70172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/17n0bc0962z2wjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17n0bc0962z2wjpg" title="17n0bc0962z2wjpg" />While it might sound like a dumb idea, designing a computer processor that can make mistakes could be a good thing—especially where energy use is a concern. Researchers from Rice University and Berkeley, along with collaborators in Europe and Singapore, have developed a new type of processor that is allowed to make occasional errors. That [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/05/this-imperfect-processor-is-15-times-more-efficient-than-yours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel: Windows 8 on ARM Is an Uphill Fight</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/05/intel-windows-8-on-arm-is-an-uphill-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/05/intel-windows-8-on-arm-is-an-uphill-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=68074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/17ma0rn4dfj9mjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17ma0rn4dfj9mjpg" title="17ma0rn4dfj9mjpg" />Windows 8 is stirring up a fair deal of controversy for Microsoft. Now, Intel has come out as saying that it thinks that running the new OS on ARM hardware is going to prove difficult. During an investor meeting, Intel&#8217;s CEO Paul Otellini pointed out that the heritage of x86 hardware will make support for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/05/intel-windows-8-on-arm-is-an-uphill-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel&#8217;s Ivy Bridge: The Maximum PC Review</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/04/intels-ivy-bridge-the-maximum-pc-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/04/intels-ivy-bridge-the-maximum-pc-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maximum PC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=63634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/17kp5d0oi1jmrjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17kp5d0oi1jmrjpg" title="17kp5d0oi1jmrjpg" />You are, no doubt, quite familiar with Intel&#8217;s CPU-release &#8220;cadence&#8221; of tick-tock by now. If not, the short story is that every tock brings a major breakthrough, while ticks are decent upgrades but nothing to Twitter home about. hat&#8217;s not necessarily the case with Intel&#8217;s latest tick, the Ivy Bridge CPU. Sure, the performance enhancements [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/04/intels-ivy-bridge-the-maximum-pc-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm Warns of International Snapdragon Chip Shortage</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/04/qualcomm-warns-of-international-snapdragon-chip-shortage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/04/qualcomm-warns-of-international-snapdragon-chip-shortage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapdragon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=61857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/17k59jxd6zuyrjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17k59jxd6zuyrjpg" title="17k59jxd6zuyrjpg" />Chip maker Qualcomm has announced that it can&#8217;t meet demand for some of its mobile phone processors — which means that Android and Windows-based phone manufacturers will have to seek an alternative in the coming months. Specifically, it turns out that Qualcomm has underestimated how widely used its S4 Snapdragon chips would be, which means [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/04/qualcomm-warns-of-international-snapdragon-chip-shortage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teardown Reveals the Apple TV&#8217;s New Guts</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/teardown-reveals-the-apple-tvs-new-guts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/teardown-reveals-the-apple-tvs-new-guts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teardown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=53137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/17gwe41y96raujpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17gwe41y96raujpg" title="17gwe41y96raujpg" />Though it's not Apple's most exciting announcement of recent time, the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/apple-tv-meta-review-1080p-and-a-whole-lot-of-convenience/">Apple TV received a big a boost</a> in specs last week. Now a teardown <a href="http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=125840">by a forum member at XBMC.org</a> shows exactly what's changed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/teardown-reveals-the-apple-tvs-new-guts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM’s Holey Optochip Pumps 1 Trillion Bits Per Second</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/ibm%e2%80%99s-holey-optochip-pumps-1-trillion-bits-per-second/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/ibm%e2%80%99s-holey-optochip-pumps-1-trillion-bits-per-second/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wired</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=50335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/17fscivn4ajjdjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="17fscivn4ajjdjpg" title="17fscivn4ajjdjpg" />IBM Researchers have built an optical chip that can transfer more data per second than pretty much anything else on the planet.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/ibm%e2%80%99s-holey-optochip-pumps-1-trillion-bits-per-second/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside Apple&#8217;s A5X Chipset: Dual-Core CPU, Quad-Core GPU</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/inside-apples-a5x-processor-dual-core-cpu-quad-core-graphics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/inside-apples-a5x-processor-dual-core-cpu-quad-core-graphics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Covert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=50068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/gdgta5x-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="gdgta5x" title="gdgta5x" />With the announcement of the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/new-ipad-hd-the-third-generation/">iPad 3</a>, came the announcement of a new processor: the A5x chipset with (presumably) a dual-core CPU and quad-core GPU. The A5x is more powerful to be sure, but should we think of it as a next-generation chip, or merely a spec bump?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/03/inside-apples-a5x-processor-dual-core-cpu-quad-core-graphics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Confirms That Ivy Bridge Is Definitely Delayed</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/02/intel-confirms-that-ivy-bridge-is-definitely-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/02/intel-confirms-that-ivy-bridge-is-definitely-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=47137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/intelivy-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="intelivy" title="intelivy" />There have been suggestions floating around that Intel's new Ivy Bridge processors would arrive later than anticipated on the market. Now, those rumours have been confirmed as true by a senior Intel employee, so we won't see the processors in April as previously expected.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/02/intel-confirms-that-ivy-bridge-is-definitely-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Single-Atom Transistor That Could Break Moore&#8217;s Law</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/02/the-single-atom-transistor-that-could-break-moores-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/02/the-single-atom-transistor-that-could-break-moores-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transistor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=44860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/medium_a8296372d45ae1a748cdfeef7d340004.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="medium_a8296372d45ae1a748cdfeef7d340004" title="medium_a8296372d45ae1a748cdfeef7d340004" />In the ongoing quest to push processor performance, the key is being able to effectively shrink their component parts. A new transistor, based on a single atom, may go further than helping speed things up: it could shatter Moore's Law.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/02/the-single-atom-transistor-that-could-break-moores-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Launching New Atom-Based Processors With Digital Wi-Fi</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/02/intel-launching-new-atom-based-processors-with-digital-wi-fi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/02/intel-launching-new-atom-based-processors-with-digital-wi-fi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosepoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=44761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/medium_b2dae3ba597b8043ad01f197216eab90.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="medium_b2dae3ba597b8043ad01f197216eab90" title="medium_b2dae3ba597b8043ad01f197216eab90" />If you thought Intel's Atom processor line was dead, think again: the company is launching a new version of the silicon, code named Rosepoint. Don't be too quick to dismiss it, either, because it sounds like the new mobile processor could mean business.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2012/02/intel-launching-new-atom-based-processors-with-digital-wi-fi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
