<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo UK &#187; science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/tag/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If Bees Die Out, This Is What Our Supermarket Shelves Will Look Like</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/if-bees-die-out-this-is-what-our-supermarket-shelves-will-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/if-bees-die-out-this-is-what-our-supermarket-shelves-will-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Gibbs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giz uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=174665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/No-Bees-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="No-Bees" title="No-Bees" />It&#8217;s really easy to dismiss the claims that a rapidly declining bee population is a bad thing. You&#8217;re not a fan of honey, so it&#8217;s not like they really do anything for you, right? Wrong. This barren foodscape is pretty much what we&#8217;ll be left with if bees go extinct. The trouble is that bees [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/if-bees-die-out-this-is-what-our-supermarket-shelves-will-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>These Beautiful Iridescent Clouds Are Actually Foreboding</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/these-beautiful-iridescent-clouds-are-actually-foreboding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/these-beautiful-iridescent-clouds-are-actually-foreboding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lily Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noctilucent clouds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=174528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18r0pk2wwnv0ejpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18r0pk2wwnv0ejpg" title="18r0pk2wwnv0ejpg" />It used to be that you could only see these shimmering cloud formations, called noctilucent clouds, if you were in the North or South Pole. But lately they&#8217;ve been on the move, and though they&#8217;re pretty to look at, their presence away from the Poles may be sign of climate change. The clouds are appearing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/these-beautiful-iridescent-clouds-are-actually-foreboding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Wants Scientists To Be More Open</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/mozilla-wants-scientists-to-be-more-open/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/mozilla-wants-scientists-to-be-more-open/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lily Newman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science lab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=174512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18r055rkqhslvjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18r055rkqhslvjpg" title="18r055rkqhslvjpg" />When researchers needed an easier way to share data and resources, and generally collaborate they invented the internet. And then they all went home and let the memes and brunch photos take over. Which is weird. Sure, initiatives like CERN are able to coordinate thousands of scientists toward common goals as a result of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/mozilla-wants-scientists-to-be-more-open/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Have Found the Ancient Secret of Indestructible Concrete</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/scientists-have-found-the-ancient-secret-of-indestructible-concrete/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/scientists-have-found-the-ancient-secret-of-indestructible-concrete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Limer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=174474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18qx6k8eq7pohjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18qx6k8eq7pohjpg" title="18qx6k8eq7pohjpg" />For the most part, we humans are better at things than we were thousands of years ago. But there are some things the ancients had down pat. Roman concrete, for instance, is just way better than anything we can whip up today. Finally, after some 2,000 years, modern-day scientists have figured it out. And it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/scientists-have-found-the-ancient-secret-of-indestructible-concrete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So What Would Happen if Superman Punched You?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/so-what-would-happen-if-superman-punched-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/so-what-would-happen-if-superman-punched-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[watch this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man of steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=174334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/superman-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="superman" title="superman" />Man of Steel is out and if you want to get your eyes pummelled with insane fight sequences, I suggest you watch it. But what if Superman actually wanted to pummel your face instead? What would a punch by Superman feel like? A lot worse than even getting punched by Mike Tyson. If Superman&#8217;s fist [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/so-what-would-happen-if-superman-punched-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Impossible History of  Perpetual Motion</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/the-impossible-history-of-perpetual-motion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/the-impossible-history-of-perpetual-motion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perpetual motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time crystals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=174207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18qq530c3v73njpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18qq530c3v73njpg" title="18qq530c3v73njpg" />On November 12th, 1717, clockmaker and mechanic Johann Bessler placed a 12-foot diameter, strange-looking wheel into a room. With a tender push, he started the contraption rotating, then confidently turned and strolled outside. Guards promptly secured and locked the door behind him. Nobody would be allowed to enter the room for two weeks, lest the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/the-impossible-history-of-perpetual-motion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Is There a Limit to Human Strength?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/why-is-there-a-limit-to-human-strength/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/why-is-there-a-limit-to-human-strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Horn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch this]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=173983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Screen-Shot-2013-06-14-at-07.34.51-140x80.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="Screen Shot 2013-06-14 at 07.34.51" title="Screen Shot 2013-06-14 at 07.34.51" />Want to be swole as hell? You can bulk up all you want, but once you get to a certain point, muscle growth is out of your hands. ASAP Science explains that our level of strength is basically pre-determined by our genetics. Our muscles are under the watchful eye of a protein called myostatin, which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/why-is-there-a-limit-to-human-strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Sunset Looks the Same on Mars as it Does in Beijing</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/why-the-sunset-looks-the-same-on-mars-as-it-does-in-beijing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/why-the-sunset-looks-the-same-on-mars-as-it-does-in-beijing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Horn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=174000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18qpuu7h1zdyppng.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18qpuu7h1zdyppng" title="18qpuu7h1zdyppng" />On the left is the sunset as seen from Mars. On the right is the same view from Beijing. Were it not for the latter&#8217;s urban setting, you might not be able to tell the difference. Crazy, right? Fortunately, science can explain why. Joe Hanson is Ph.D biologist brain behind PBS&#8217;s It&#8217;s Okay to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/why-the-sunset-looks-the-same-on-mars-as-it-does-in-beijing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ice Sheets Were Terrifyingly Thick 20,000 Years Ago</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/ice-sheets-were-terrifying-thick-20000-years-ago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/ice-sheets-were-terrifying-thick-20000-years-ago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xkcd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=174130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18qs4fgthc18wpng.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18qs4fgthc18wpng" title="18qs4fgthc18wpng" />Since our planet was born, it&#8217;s gone through periods of extreme cold known as ice ages—but you might not realise just how of the cold stuff came with them. Spoiler: a lot. This neat visualisation by Randall Monroe of XKCD fame shows just how thick the ice sheets covering our planet were 20,000 years ago. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/ice-sheets-were-terrifying-thick-20000-years-ago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Slow-Mo Test Tube Explosion Barks Like a Guard Dog of Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/this-slow-mo-test-tube-explosion-barks-like-a-guard-dog-of-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/this-slow-mo-test-tube-explosion-barks-like-a-guard-dog-of-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Limer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[watch this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barking dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow motion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=173964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Screen-shot-2013-06-13-at-5.44.20-PM-140x80.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="Screen shot 2013-06-13 at 5.44.20 PM" title="Screen shot 2013-06-13 at 5.44.20 PM" />It&#8217;s one thing when a dog barks; it&#8217;s another one entirely when a giant pipe full of fire does it. And it&#8217;s even better in slow motion. &#8220;The Barking Dog&#8221; is a pretty standard science experiement you might have seen in a chem class. All you do is light up a giant test tube full [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/this-slow-mo-test-tube-explosion-barks-like-a-guard-dog-of-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science Discovered a New Human Body Part</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/science-discovered-a-new-human-body-part/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/science-discovered-a-new-human-body-part/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Clark Estes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eyeballs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=173727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18qmh5j2mgbhdjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18qmh5j2mgbhdjpg" title="18qmh5j2mgbhdjpg" />A funny thing happened in the field of anatomy during the first half of this year. Researchers found a previously unknown human body part. It&#8217;s inside the eyeball, and it&#8217;s very small. At 15 microns thick, the newly discovered layer of material is so small that even calling it a new body part feels inappropriate. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/science-discovered-a-new-human-body-part/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planet Earth Can&#8217;t Afford Its New Gigantic Particle Accelerator</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/planet-earth-cant-afford-its-new-gigantic-particle-accelerator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/planet-earth-cant-afford-its-new-gigantic-particle-accelerator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Clark Estes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CERN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higgs boson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=173725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18qmatyuevmhrjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18qmatyuevmhrjpg" title="18qmatyuevmhrjpg" />A team of scientists unveiled the technical designs for the International Linear Collider (ILC), a proposed particle accelerator that could unravel the deepest mysteries of the universe. At just under 20-miles long, it&#8217;s about 30 per cent larger than the world&#8217;s biggest particle accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. Extra [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/planet-earth-cant-afford-its-new-gigantic-particle-accelerator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Make Instant Barrel-Aged Cocktails</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/how-to-make-instant-barrel-aged-cocktails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/how-to-make-instant-barrel-aged-cocktails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 19:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[happy hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barrel-aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[booze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cocktails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=172366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/k-xlarge1-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="k-xlarge" title="k-xlarge" />If you&#8217;ve been spending too much time in bars lately—and we certainly hope you have been—you&#8217;ve likely noticed the rise of barrel-aged cocktails. The technique takes some of your favourite mixed drinks, mellows them out, and adds some layers of complexity. There is, however, a barrier to entry for most at-home barkeeps: Patience. Unless you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/how-to-make-instant-barrel-aged-cocktails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Population Growth and Climate Change Explained Using Lego</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/population-growth-and-climate-change-explained-using-lego/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/population-growth-and-climate-change-explained-using-lego/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Condliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[watch this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poplulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=172191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Poulation-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="Population" title="Population" />There&#8217;s seemingly no limit to the power of Lego, and in this video Hans Rosling uses it with great panache to explain the problems of population growth and climate change. They&#8217;re two of the biggest, most complex subjects we currently face on this planet, but somehow Rosling manages to make it all seem extremely straightforward. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/population-growth-and-climate-change-explained-using-lego/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slo-Mo Lightning Footage Is Why High Speed Cameras Were Invented</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/slo-mo-lightning-footage-is-why-high-speed-cameras-were-invented/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/slo-mo-lightning-footage-is-why-high-speed-cameras-were-invented/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Liszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[watch this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slo-mo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slomo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=172248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Lightning-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="Lightning" title="Lightning" />The odds of capturing a lightning bolt on a high-speed camera in the wild are probably pretty similar to getting hit yourself — slim to nil. So to vastly improve their chances, the slo-mo team at BBC Earth Productions visited the Morgan-Botti Lightning Lab in England where the electrifying bolts are produced every day. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/slo-mo-lightning-footage-is-why-high-speed-cameras-were-invented/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s a 120,000 Year Old Tumour Found Inside a Neanderthal</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/heres-a-120000-year-old-tumour-found-inside-a-neanderthal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/heres-a-120000-year-old-tumour-found-inside-a-neanderthal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neanderthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=172003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18q1gndc8csahjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18q1gndc8csahjpg" title="18q1gndc8csahjpg" />Neanderthals weren&#8217;t smoking cigarettes. They weren&#8217;t breathing in pollution. They weren&#8217;t eating processed foods. They weren&#8217;t dealing with pesticides. Nope. But apparently, Neanderthals still got cancer. This 120,000-year-old bone fragment reveals a cancerous tumour: Neanderthals, they&#8217;re just like us. The case of fibrous dysplasia in this Neanderthal bone is believed to be the oldest tumour [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/heres-a-120000-year-old-tumour-found-inside-a-neanderthal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Time Cloak Made from Lasers Can Erase Data from History</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/a-time-cloak-made-from-lasers-can-erase-data-from-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/a-time-cloak-made-from-lasers-can-erase-data-from-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invisibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time cloak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=171696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18pxoa4jvrrcojpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18pxoa4jvrrcojpg" title="18pxoa4jvrrcojpg" />Time cloaks are so much cooler than invisibility cloaks because they use freaking time to hide things, not silly dumb vision tricks. This new method of using a time cloak is the first that can cloak data at rapid rates. It might change security altogether. The idea behind a time cloak is sort of simple [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/a-time-cloak-made-from-lasers-can-erase-data-from-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Science of Hangovers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/the-science-of-hangovers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/the-science-of-hangovers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[booze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hangovers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch this]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=171702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="140" height="80" src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Science-of-hangovers-140x80.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="Science-of-hangovers" title="Science-of-hangovers" />Hangovers only exist because they keep us from partying and drinking and going nuts every single night. It&#8217;s a fail-safe for humans so we don&#8217;t all devolve into permanently-drunk wrecks. It&#8217;s payment for fun. It sucks. But what&#8217;s the real science behind it? It all boils down to three things. Dehydration. Acetaldehyde. Congener. Damn those [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/the-science-of-hangovers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Have Found the Oldest Primate Skeleton Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/scientists-have-found-the-oldest-primate-skeleton-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/scientists-have-found-the-oldest-primate-skeleton-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Feinberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=171677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18px1oc8v4xdhpng.png" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18px1oc8v4xdhpng" title="18px1oc8v4xdhpng" />Today&#8217;s smallest primate, the pygmy mouse lemur, can reach up to about 5 inches in height — and that&#8217;s even on the larger side. But the primate skeleton that researchers just uncovered, the oldest ever found on record, stood even smaller than our pygmy friend as it scampered around the earth — a whole 55 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/scientists-have-found-the-oldest-primate-skeleton-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awesome Window Skins Let Sun Keep You Warm in Winter, Cool in Summer</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/awesome-window-skins-let-sun-keep-you-warm-in-winter-cool-in-summer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/awesome-window-skins-let-sun-keep-you-warm-in-winter-cool-in-summer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 07:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Liszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/?p=171654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/18pwqgil8lqxqjpg.jpg" class="attachment-frontpage-smallthumb wp-post-image" alt="18pwqgil8lqxqjpg" title="18pwqgil8lqxqjpg" />In the cold winter months you&#8217;ll do everything you can to maximise your exposure to the sun. In the scorching summer, though, it&#8217;s just the opposite. So what if there were a way to harness/banish the sun&#8217;s rays without a constant battle with curtains or venetian blinds? Researchers at Japan&#8217;s National Institute of Advanced Industrial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/06/awesome-window-skins-let-sun-keep-you-warm-in-winter-cool-in-summer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
