Brutal Fungal Disease Could Threaten Snakes on a Global Scale

By George Dvorsky on at

It starts with a single lesion. And then another. Soon, the snake’s entire body is covered in the unsightly sores. If the snake is lucky, its skin will start moulting, expunging the reptile of the infection. Less fortunate snakes will die. And in some cases, desperate snakes will spend more time in the sun to expedite the molting process—a risky move that makes them vulnerable to predators.

This awful fungal infection is caused by a pathogen called Ophidiomyces ophidiodiicola, and it’s starting to make scientists quite nervous. As a new study published in Scientific Advances points out, this infectious disease, which is known to afflict a handful of snake species in the United States and Europe, could soon reach global, pandemic proportions.

A team of scientists from the American Museum of Natural History, the US Geological Survey, and the University of Maryland, College Park, say snake fungal disease (SFD) can infect many species of snake regardless of genetic predispositions, physical characteristics, or habitat (this fungus doesn’t harm humans, in case you’re wondering). Disturbingly, virtually every snake on the planet is at risk—and the call is now out for scientists to be on the look-out for this emerging threat.

A milk snake showing signs of SFD. (Image: USGS National Wildlife Health Center/D.E. Green)

Frank Burbrink, an associate curator in the AMNH’s Department of Herpetology and the lead author of the new study, didn’t mince words in a published statement.

“This really is the worst-case scenario,” he exclaimed. “Our study suggests that first responders shouldn’t just be looking for certain types of snakes that have this disease, but at the whole community. All snakes could become infected, or already are infected.”

O. ophidiodiicola only infects snakes, and it causes skin swelling, crusts, and nodules of the skin. It’s often fatal. Scientists aren’t sure how it’s transmitted, but it may spread from snake-to-snake after they rub against each other, or when they slither through a contaminated environment. In the United States, this disease is known to afflict 23 different species in the wild, most especially rat snakes, milk snakes, and garter snakes. The disease is most prominent in the eastern parts of the US, where it’s already causing population declines. As the new study points out, the disease has now spread to Europe, where it’s affecting three different species.

This eastern racer with SFD is exhibiting several abnormalities, including an opaque infected eye, roughened crusty scales on the chin, and several discoloured roughened scales on the side of neck. (Image: USGS National Wildlife Health Center/D.E. Green)

It’s very difficult at the moment to predict the scope and spread of SFD, so the research team turned to a neural network for help. The artificially intelligent system was fed genetic data about the snakes, information about each snake’s physical characteristics, and other measures. As the authors write in their study, results showed that “SFD hosts are both phylogenetically and ecologically randomly dispersed,” meaning the disease affects snakes regardless of their ancestry or location. This suggests that all 98 species of snakes in the US are potentially at risk, and that the epidemic could go global. The model is not perfect—it’s only as good as the data that’s put into it—but the result is alarming nonetheless, and a sure sign that more work needs to be done in this area.

Indeed, this finding is particularly upsetting given how bad fungal infections are known to be. For example, there’s white-nose syndrome in bats and chytridiomycosis in amphibians. In the case of bats, white-nose syndrome has spread from coast-to-coast in the US. At least four species have suffered massive population declines, including one that may eventually become extinct. Part of the reason why fungal diseases are so nasty is that they’re capable of infecting multiple species, as is the case with O. ophidiodiicola and snakes.

“We need to know more about the extent of the disease,” Burbrink told Gizmodo. “How many species has it infected? Is mortality as a high across all infected species and populations? And where globally is this occurring? Also, we need to know more about disease transmission and if humans are exacerbating the spread and effects. So, lots more people monitoring this in the field and in research collections and laboratories.”

Because losing lots of snakes would be bad for the whole environment. Sure, they can make us squeamish, but they fill an important ecological role.

“As midlevel predators, snakes may be an integral part of food webs consuming a large number of rodents and other animals and they themselves being consumed by larger mammalian and avian predators,” said Burbrink. “Losing them in any population will certainly be to the detriment of a healthy ecosystem for other organisms and humans.” [Scientific Advances]

More Science Posts: